Search results

85 mm for the Nittaku acoustic inner carbon g revision, my Butterfly Petr Korbel blade is 82mm (the handle is a bit thin for me), my sons Butterfly Primoric is 85mm

The g revision model is great for medium size to large hands. The small handle versions some put tape on it, also found smaller handle meant the blade can be a touch head heavy too, so less balanced. But it also depends on weight of the blade , in my experience they can range from 82g to 95g. My...

Hi all, Wondering if people have tried both these rubbers what did you prefer out of these on your Forehand ? How would compare the speed, spin and control between the two blades? Thanks

Hi, I have been testing some forehand rubbers in the last 6 weeks to see what works the best on my two inner carbon blades. This is what I think I have found so far; this is my subjective opinion and I am only on the lower intermediate scale as a player. Moved from Petr Korbel (Japan) blade...

I think I was lucky to get one that thick though I think they are normally 5.5mm. Don't think they have a 5.8mm in g revision version yet though.

Mine was 94/95g blade, it works well with Razka x rubbers

Is a controllable blade in both the short game and also off the table. Plenty of feedback in blade ? Thanks

Hi, I just found out their is a new thicker version (5.5 to 5.8 mm) of the Nittaku acoustic Inner carbon blade? Link: https://www.tabletennis11.com/other_eng/nittaku-acoustic-carbon-inner-5-8 Its meant to be faster etc Has anyone used it? I have a Nittaku g-revision version (94g) and its close...

An innercarbon blade could be an option, nittaku inner carbon, dhs 301 or butterfly innerforce

Primorac can be reasonably fast with the right rubbers. Son uses butterfly Rozena on both sides. Started with sriver then moved up to Rozena

Primorac is thicker handle than the korbel. I put butterfly grip tape on the korbel to thicken it up, also made it less head heavy. The new nittaku acoustic g revision is a good size handle.

The petr korbel is pretty close to the nittaku acoustic for deep hold according to that graph. I love the feeling of the korbel when you hit the ball.

Okay, thanks for the clarification, that makes sense😊

Sorry I was meant to reply to lazer, I put it with the wrong quote. Sorry ☹️

I don't think butterfly is a waste of money, just more expensive than some other brands. Many top players use butterfly.

Was Rozena on your forehand or backhand?

totally agree 😊

I add something else, I think rubbers also depends on the blade you use. For example, the dhs 301 been a firmer blade it was less catapult with Rozena, however with my nittaku acoustic inner, been a softer wood it was to catapulty , so not linear in play. So far less control. Lot less gears...

Hi , I am using a sriver on backhand on dhs 301. Want something that has heaps of control and does not catapult on back hand . Find sriver okay but if mishit it goes flying . Want something softer more dwell time less catapult. Think in Razka 7. Soft of dhs hurricane 3 . What do you recommend...

In what way did you find glayzer better?