Search results

  1. Need new FH rubber to my Stiga Cybershape Carbon

    OK, I have a similar problem with the softer (boosted...) H3 37 on my BH. Much easier to block such shots with the harder H3 39 on my FH. Could be that the R7 Soft bottoms out when you return these shots and/or the R7 Soft has a too strong "catapult" effect. A harder rubber could solve that...
  2. Hurricane H3 with curly tail

    Got the first Seamoons from AliExpress/Chinese PingPong and the one I'm using now just recently from TT11. The printing on the one from TT11 says 2021 but worked as expected ;) Can the booster get off? Good question, I think Pong Professor aka Patrick Hrdlicka could answer that. He should also...
  3. Need new FH rubber to my Stiga Cybershape Carbon

    Might be a bit too extreme change from Rakza 7/X Soft but definitely allows a more open bat angle ;) Xiom Vega Asia DF (bit harder than R7Soft) has a low throw angle but I don't know if this fixes the problem. Do speedy rallies mean lower power shots and close to the table or higher power...
  4. Hurricane H3 with curly tail

    I've seen slight reverse doming and shrinking but not nearly as extreme. Maybe a bad batch of Seamoon? Will watch my recently bought and boosted H3s and H3N if that happens.
  5. Alternative to Hurricane 3 Neo

    Both DHS and 729 should update their websites a bit more regularly ;) H8-80 or H9? Not on website. Dragon-F and L not on website... If the 47° Bloom Power has the same sponge hardness as my Dragon-Fs (definitely harder than 47° ESN or H3N 37) than this could be an alternative.
  6. Alternative to Hurricane 3 Neo

    That's the problem with TT equipment. Much personal preference and no (widely) available ways to measure differences objectively. B2P boosted or not: both. Throw angle got better but still less than H3. Bloom Power (sponge) hardness: felt softer than 38° or 39° Shore A which both 729 and DHS...
  7. Alternative to Hurricane 3 Neo

    Bloom Power and B2 Provincial are not that similar to H3/H3N ;) Bloom Power is much softer (afaik only 45 °ESN and 47 °ESN available, can't remember which version I got) than my usual H3s. Has lower throw but more tackiness and lacks power (and spin) on high power shots due to the softer sponge...
  8. I saw a thread about the weight of impact. It should be force of impact.

    Let's spice the pop-corn up, Tony :) Rinaldi and Manin are also coauthors of the newer paper "Dynamical buckling of a table-tennis ball impinging normally on a rigid target: experimental and numerical studies", Rémond et al., 2022 https://hal.science/hal-03718994 Now we only need to do some...
  9. I saw a thread about the weight of impact. It should be force of impact.

    Assuming a coefficient of restitution of 90% (blade with rubbers) and a 4 ms contact time. For the velocity of the ball after impact we get: cor = 90%, m_racket = 0.18 kg, m_ball = 0.0027 kg, v_racket_0 = 0 m/s, v_ball_0 = 10 m/s, m_total = 0.1827 kg v_ball_1 = (m_ball * v_ball_0 + m_racket *...
  10. Stiga Offensive Classic vs. Avalox P500

    I would say this is the right way but I'm also used to these kind of setups so I might be a bit biased ;) Technique and also footwork matters more than equipment and this it what such a setup helps or forces one to improve but only if one is willing to. If you plan to continue using tacky...
  11. DHS W968 review

    Depending on where one buys the Nittaku H3Neo NR-8701 could be cheaper...
  12. Stiga Offensive Classic vs. Avalox P500

    You can thank Stiga for that ;) They changed the composition quite a lot. From walnut, limba, ayous then walnut, paduk, ayous to walnut, spruce, ayous to koto, spruce, ayous and todays limba, spruce, ayous... http://mytabletennis.net/forum/stiga-offensive-wood-plies_topic59587.html
  13. Stiga Offensive Classic vs. Avalox P500

    Thickness plays an important role: 5.7 mm to 5.8 mm for the P500 vs. <= 5.4 mm for the OC. Outer ply also plays a role: koto for the P500 vs. depending on the selection (slightly) softer limba on the OC. Very old OCs had koto outer plies too but not todays OCs. The type of glue can make a...
  14. Neottec Mark Carbon

    I'm impressed. Setup weights: 179 g for the Mark Carbon with Nittaku H3Neo 39 on FH and H3Neo 37 on BH (quite heavy H3s...), main blade YEO with the same rubbers except that the FH H3(Neo) has no Nittaku label 178g. First difference: the Mark Carbon setup is balanced differently. Feels less head...
  15. www.spinfactory.de

    Very legit. https://www.youtube.com/@spinfactory All the review videos were shot in their store in Cologne. There's also a TT club named after/sponsored by Spinfactory https://www.djk-spinfactory-koeln.de/verein/ueber-uns/ where some of the employees/owners play.
  16. Welcome to TableTennisDaily 3.0 - Bug Report

    Great to see TTD up and running again :)
  17. Share your Racket's Photo

    Nittaku H3 Neo 39 FH, H3 37 BH on a Neottec Mark Carbon. Weight 179g, given that the blade only weighs 79g I got some heavier H3s but the setup does not feel head heavy.
  18. Not again about boosting please

    Yasaka tried https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dibutyl_sebacate for boosting https://patents.google.com/patent/JP2008049094A/en "The present invention relates to a swelling agent for table tennis rubber used for swelling and softening table tennis rubber and maintaining a function of imparting...
  19. Neottec Mark Carbon

    Persson Powerplay was my weapon of choice in the 38 mm era... If I try to bend these blades they show (as far as I can "measure" this with my hands) similar flex and bouncing a ball on the bare blade feels quite similar (the Mark Carbon provides more feedback at the index finger). Will see how...
  20. Neottec Mark Carbon

    Good quality. Same level as Yasaka, Yinhe, Donic or Stiga. Limba surface is quite smooth. Not much sanding required compared to other blades (e.g. Victas Swat, Persson Powerplay). Composition: limba outer, ayous(?), some sort of carbon, kiri (at least it has less resistance to my fingernail...
Top