Search results

Yes, could be. And why would the colours still stay as is? Is it not that the colours of rubber and sponge don't change even after months of repeatedly boosting?

Correct, but it still evaporates. If you manage to measure a difference between before and after, you still don't know what has caused the difference.

And how exactly would you factor in natural evaporation of the booster?

Plus, chemical reactions always go hand in hand with decomposition of the impacted materials.

No, sorry. Really not. Please explain why the colours stay when a rubber is boosted and a chemical reaction occurs. We turn in circles so I let you stay with your misbelief. But, if you are stating things like these, you should look at the whole picture and be able to explain observations or at...

Yep

Well, you may believe it, I surely not. This is no evidence of gas creation. The rapid expansion can also be explained by fast absorption. This not evidence of a change of the chemical structure. Change of initial characteristics can be caused by physical changes, e.g. liquid water/solid ice...

Correct. But you say it: not all chemical reactions build gases. Typically, gases are built with strong oxidising or reducing agents like acids or bases. Booster oil and rubbers are chemically very stable and are not such agents. If a rubber gets stiff over time, then it is because over time...

With boostering a rubber to me there is no chemical reactions at all - no formation of gas, no nothing. Everything can be explained by changes of physical properties. Just assume there was a chemical reaction with formation of gases ... Then either the rubber or the top sheet or the booster...

Still, I disagree. I am a Chemist and in all modesty I don't see how a thick oil in a chemical reaction should form gases. There is nothing in both the booster and the rubber that would give substance to the formation of gases. Still, I might be wrong as well but I just don't see it. Do you...

Are you sure about the formation of gases?

Yes, okay

If you get a chance, watch the video I posted. What Gan does for the Asian region, Dario does for the European. His reviews are excellent.

Correct. Here is a great summary of the TDE.

1. High, depending on the technique comparable to H3 2. H3 > TDE 3. Flat shots are difficult, better to do speedy spin smashes; blocks are more challenging than H3, if done actively then better. i.e. not hitting the net. The weight is quite high, higher than H3. Also, TDE needs more body...

I can confirm Victas Triple Double Extra is tacky like hell.

Maybe DHS put something else in there which in its chemical structure is different than the Haifus and the like. Tibhar's MX-P also has a non-natural smell.

Sorry, I am new to this topic. I also thought the sponge of the Neos is boosted. But if it's not true, where does the stinky smell come from?

Maybe let's give credit to the creator of those two graphs above. TTGEARLAB provides excellent reviews of blades only. https://ttgearlab.com/2023/10/30/andro-gauzy-sl-off-full-review/