Search results

For the backhand, there are a lot of cheaper Tenergy 05 substitutes but it all depends on your preferences. M1, Rasant, MX-P, Omega V Tour, Joola Maxx, Rakza 9/X - all those rubbers play aggressively enough with their extra booster to be used as aggressively as T05. You may not like the way...

They both look pretty good for kill shots on relatively high and easy balls.

Here is a review by tt89player which captures my sentiments exactly. I will post the google translation. http://www.tt-spin.de/tibhar-genius-vs-donic-baracuda-vs-andro-hexer/ Tibhar Genius vs. Donic Baracuda vs. andro Hexer October 13, 2014 of tt89player They were the answer to Butterfly's...

Luck of the draw will have some influence. So that will be important to see as well.

Luck of the draw will have some influence. So that will be important to see as well.

Let's just say there are tricks which you can use. That said, most people who are not familiar with the basic serve misread it as backspin quite a few times. But you can serve backspin with it. It's all about the swing size and contact point.

Hexer blocks better than T05 and I know at least one player (not me) who will tell you that his technique is more effective with Hexer than with T05. Simon Gerada was also using Hexer when he was initially sponsored by Andro (don't know whether he has changed recently). The thing about Tenergy...

Exactly.

Clearly, the green floor is ZJK's kryptonite. Look at how he is playing on it.

Yes. When Jim Butler and Kanal Chodri played two years ago, people made a lot of fun of American TT. It would be interesting to hear the take of same people on this match.

It is made in Japan after all...

Practiced a lot yesterday. Probably a little too much practice. I posted some of the videos publicly. I really need to fix my banana flick.

All that work for a biased review... j/k. Interested in the rubber and will hit when we next meet.

So does the topsheet have grip or not? Is this better than MX-P or not? Tenergy 05? Can you find an objective 3rd party to review? (NL in harsh anti-biased reviewer and journalist mode)

Let me give an example. There are people who do not know the exact rules for selecting Olympic players. There are people who do not know that the rules in 2008 were different from the rules in 2012 and that the rules in 2016 were different from both 2012 and 2008. Now if Weikert spoke about...

I think sometimes, it is better to ask for clarification of what someone is writing than to misinterpret it to get a chuckle. What I meant was that there was nothing that Weikert said that one could not know if one read Larry Hodges blog or followed ITTF discussions that were done on ooakforum...

Yes, maybe they were too high. But why does that mean I need meds? Could you explain in more detail? IF you read the main podcast thread, Tornado16 expressed the same sentiments that I did. Does he need meds too?

I think it is better to ask questions about what you don't understand or explain why you are acting like Weikert is your daddy. What did he say in the podcast that impressed you?

Lisening to the podcast so far, I could be ITTF president... I know as much as he does - I just don''t know the people.

And you were chewing popcorn idly on the sidelines as I tried to get Tony's Table Tennis to see this perspective?