It has been shown that Nakamura has beaten Carlsen in blitz many times, and that refutes your opinion.
You don't think the same in either standard or Blitz game, Blitz is more in the "autopilot" area, you should look at some funny faces in online blitz games with Etienne Bacrot when he facepalms after doing a terrible move he would have never done with more time and in a different mood.
That's why it's possible to see some HUGE surprises in that 11 pts format in TT that you would have never seen in the old format.
I think the right move would be to transition to the Volley-Ball system: 25 pts per set, and then at 2 sets a 15 pts tie break, shorter enough and long enough to see some come backs...
The 21 pts regular game, 1 game all and then 11pts tie break would have been awesome to me, or 2/2 with 21 pts each game and then tie break 11 pts in the 5 th game for the SF and F matches, the 5 or 6 pts they do sometimes is stupid, it's way too short. It's like playing bullet in chess (1 mn/1 mn).
You don't think the same in either standard or Blitz game, Blitz is more in the "autopilot" area, you should look at some funny faces in online blitz games with Etienne Bacrot when he facepalms after doing a terrible move he would have never done with more time and in a different mood.
That's why it's possible to see some HUGE surprises in that 11 pts format in TT that you would have never seen in the old format.
I think the right move would be to transition to the Volley-Ball system: 25 pts per set, and then at 2 sets a 15 pts tie break, shorter enough and long enough to see some come backs...
The 21 pts regular game, 1 game all and then 11pts tie break would have been awesome to me, or 2/2 with 21 pts each game and then tie break 11 pts in the 5 th game for the SF and F matches, the 5 or 6 pts they do sometimes is stupid, it's way too short. It's like playing bullet in chess (1 mn/1 mn).