I think a better way to test a bare blade may be the "knock on head" test. To do this you have to hold the side of blade face with your tumb and middle finger, than you knock the handle on your head and pay atention on the sound it makes.
From what I've read, that way you can hear the pitch and sound lenght. The pitch is suposed to indicate speed and hardness (higher = faster/harder), while sound duration indicates the amount of vibration and flex (longer sound = more vibration/flex).
I don't know how precise is this method but from the little I tested it kinda worked, I think... I tested Virtuoso Off-, Virtuoso+, Ovtcharov True Carbon and Nittaku Miyabi. The result was as follow if I remember correctly:
Pitch (higher to low, or faster/harder to slower/softer): NM > OTC > V+ > V-
Sound duration (higher to low, or flexier/more vibration to stiff/less vibration): V- > V+ > OTC > NM
The only strange thing is that NM is rated faster than OTC according to this test. I haven't played with NM so I can't confirm, but I suspect it is wrong. Maybe one ply hinoki blades work different, it seems to be a kind of unique type of wood. The other results sounds right (though I haven't played with V+ either, it is a well known fact that V+ is faster and harder than V-).
This test probably works better when comparing blades of same type (allwood vs allwood, composite vs composite, alc vs alc, etc). Has anyone compared more blades with this kind of test? It would be very interesting to know how reliable is this, it is not always that you have a chance to do a proper test with blade + rubbers you know + ball you know when you go to buy a new blade, and this is an easy method to compare with your current blade.
Edit: just to add some info, it is easier to notice difference in sound by this method then bouncing the ball on blade. I couldn't differenciate the sound of V- and V+ on ball bouncing test, but knocking then on the head produces a different sound: the sounds are similar, but there is clearly some difference!