This user has no status.
It was way too quick on my Viscaria and Timo Boll Alc. It was even not possible to sweat during matches in compared to the matches I play with normal setups. I found it boring to do winner on one shot, the three misses. At my level, table tennis rallies are rarely at that tempo. So when opponent pushes, scoops back with weird technique, super old rubber, weird pips etc., ball comes back with million different variations, at those circumstances you are going to beg for slower setup.So what is the current verdict on 2.5 vs 2.7 sponge thickness for non-pro players? 2.7 best for FH and 2.5 better for BH or 2.5 better for both BH/FH?
I have only tried Zyre 2.5 on FH(on a Visc SALC) for a couple of minutes and it definitely felt quite different to any other butterfly rubber I have tried. Closest comparable rubber for me would probably be D05 but since I only tried it on FH for a couple of minutes, mainly looping, I am not sure how correct my observations were.
I believe this rubber on outer carbon is just for bang-bang game.
It is less springy with short balls on outer carbon than on inner carbon blade. I guess, the best inner carbon experience with this rubber I had was on Innerforce ALC.S. I had enough dwell time to play difficult shots where I had to react fast.
Andro Treiber FI felt too soft and springy with less spin.
Hurricane Long 5 was too springy and quick with less spin.
Virtuoso+ was safest I found. It requires using more force to activate rubber, maybe because of softer structure than carbon blades. The annoying part was high arc. After learning using sponge more, it became less problem, but still exists. Because it requires to close the racket angle too much, I felt way less need for power-from-the-ground. Which was kinda annoying, after playing many years with tacky rubbers.