This user has no status.
Member
Thanks for the detailed breakdown and the tests with different rubbers.The D09C I had was only slightly ‘tacky’ / ‘sticky’, it could only lift the ball for a fraction of a second, like many ‘modern’ hybrid rubbers. DHS H3 now has reduced tack or stickiness, bringing it more in line with ‘modern’ hybrids.
’grippy’ rubbers ( non tacky / sticky ) don’t lift a ball at all.
Maybe -
‘tacky’ rubbers lift the ball for a fraction of a second.
’sticky’ rubbers lift and hold the ball for at least a second.
There is definitely some confusion regarding Tacky v Sticky !!
I just did a ball lift test with 3 bats, So maybe …….
Bat 1 - Zyre 03 both sides = GRIPPY - not able to lift the ball.
Bat 2 - Xiom O8H and O8C -
O8H barely lifted the ball = TACKY
O8C lifted the ball for maybe 1/4 of a second = TACKY
Bat 3 - Xiom Tau 2 both sides (old sheets) lifted the ball for maybe 1 second + = STICKY.
To apply your classification to my case: all my previous D09C sheets were indeed 'Tacky' (lifting the ball briefly).
However, this specific defective sheet behaves exactly like your Bat 1. It is strictly 'Grippy' and cannot lift the ball at all. It feels closer to a standard Dignics 05 than an 09C. This complete lack of tackiness is exactly why I am certain it is a manufacturing defect