I've played with the Harimoto Tomokazu Super ALC for like 4 sessions now and a little with robot (~8-10 hours total). My first impressions of this blade fit with the conventional wisdom of inner vs outer carbon blades (increased dwell time, more gears, better spin generation), as well as the idea of Super ALC (more catapult on big shots). I've been playing Viscaria for two years now so that is the baseline for my comparison. I've been hovering around 1700 USATT but enough about me, now onto the Harimoto Blade...
Something noticeable to me and everyone who tries it... it's a little head heavy, particularly in comparison to my Viscaria-FL. My Harimoto is Anatomic handle, but the slightly wider/oversized head means the rubbers are a little larger and weigh more. It's noticeable in the hand but the extra weight provides some nice oomph on big shots. My HTSALC is 90g I think which is probably more than my Viscaria by 2g+ but I don't know for sure (maybe it's time to get a scale?). If you've used other Harimoto blades then this is nothing new.
I like the anatomic handle. I grip the racket up pretty high so I often felt with flared that my lower fingers were having to pinch too narrow causing them to be too involved. The anatomic handle is a little thicker so my hand is slightly less closed. I'm trying to focus more on thumb and index finger for my shots (with support from middle finger - looser from other two overall).
Anyway, here are my comparisons between the two blades...
Harimoto Tomokazu Super ALC (with Dignics 05 - 2.1 FH and Dignics 80 - 1.9 BH):
- Softer feeling and slightly more time with the ball
- More sensitive to heavy spin but also able to generate spin more easily. Angle matters more on blocks vs heavy spin opens but also allows you to play on top and send a spinnier block back, which has some arc and safety to it. Feels very nice for blocking overall. More of a glove feeling.
- Less sensitive to speed - able to absorb and take some pace off more easily. Slower on slow/weak balls. Top-end power is apparent on big shots and has nice control there. The extra spin generation brings ball down near end-line even with a good amount of speed.
Butterfly Viscaria (Have a sheet of D05/D80 on BH of my blades so I can compare, but had H3 few months FH):
- Quick rebound and crisp feeling. Ball is gone quickly from the racket = time of contact (angle, speed, rigidity, etc.) is very important (less time with ball to adjust trajectory or generate spin).
- Relatively not too sensitive to spin on its own but harder to slow down or control a strong incoming ball with speed and spin. Slightly more range on the block angle for heavy spin, can be more open but this sends back flatter/faster ball (perhaps less safety as the incoming shot crosses a certain power threshold). I block well with my Viscaria but I also just enjoy blocking in general.
I feel enough flex on big forehands on either blade for my needs. I am happy with the additional spin generated on my opens with Harimoto. This helps my backhand open set me up more often, rather than getting countered strongly or blocked effectively. Forehand open feels like I am grabbing the ball and have a split-second more time to spin it compared to Viscaria.
I feel a little more confident in a rally using both sides with the Harimoto because of the softer feeling, particularly on my backhand which is weaker. I've also been focused on improving these shots so can't give the blade much credit but it serves my purposes well here. I don't have enough time with the new racket to say much about serves, short game, etc. I think I can blast through balls better with Viscaria but that's partly due to experience/confidence with it. I like how both blades loop but extra spin and dwell of Harimoto are nice to have.
Note on the rubbers: I find D05-2.1 kinda fast and bouncy, too reactive, on the Viscaria backhand, whereas I feel like I could play it on Harimoto. I think D80 is incredible on Viscaria and it's good on Harimoto (could prob do well with 2.1). I have that in 1.9 on my blades so it's not a direct comparison between rubbers but I think I feel the blades better with 1.9 and I like that the backhand shots don't go quite as long so I can add a little more myself. D05 favors more aggressive and forward spinning over the top of the ball in my opinion, whereas D80 is a little more neutral so it spins, drives, and punches well on the backhand for me. D05 feels more natural and aggressive on FH to me but D80 is good too.
I may try to get an H3 on the FH of Harimoto for a short time just to see but I want to use the Dignics for now. Enjoying the blade and looking forward to using it more. Lot of possibilities!!!