This user has no status.
🏆 Top 1% Commenter
Well-Known Member
Well-Known Member
Okay, the first thing is that you said I don't have a scientific proof for it and that therefore it was my opinion. My point is that even saying that taking life away from living things is bad cannot be proven scientifically. This is well known. So asking for a scientific argument why something is bad is already a rookie error. Now you have gone on to say that commonly agreed upon is a good replacement. This is also a rookie error. Just because many people believe or agree with something doesn't make it scientific. My main issue is with the idea that I needed a scientific proof for a statement that was clearly a moral statement and not a scientific one.Ahh, so we’re back to this now, good. Like I’ve already said before, which you also realized yourself, you can’t prove it is bad. And I meant to say bad, because anything that makes you feel worse can be considered bad, thus you saying “making it harder to date” is part of being bad, unless you like it to be harder. But since you started this how debate, it’s obvious you don’t like it harder, so we can just apply common sense here. This means what you said there just don’t make sense, because they’re really the same thing, just different words, meaning you thinking one is easily answered while the other can’t be, is wrong. Also the murder analogy is wrong analogy because even though it is an opinion, it is also a commonly agreed upon that taking life away from living things, is bad, and it’s especially true when that living thing is a human. While what we’re discussing is whether it’s a good idea to “teach your significant other stuff they don’t know”. I say it can be done that benefits both entities, and have been done. You are saying it shouldn’t be done, and no one should try.
Now, just because it is possible for a guy to date a lady and teach her table tennis and have a successful relationship with her doesn't make the idea that teaching a lady one is dating to play table tennis is a bad idea an opinion. It would be like saying that because it is possible for a top level athlete to smoke that all top level athletes should be smokers. What you probably meant was that there are subjective components to the discussion and you have an experience where you made it work. Just as there are top level athletes who have successfully smoked. But Carl, myself and DerEchte discussed some of the reasons why it is not a good idea. Again, it is not that different from arguing that it is difficult to have a steady relationship with a partner who is promiscuous. Can you scientifically prove it, by showing that there are no exceptions? Of course not. Is it just an opinion? Like I said, I discuss these things more with people I know. And since I don't know you and you don't know me, it is better we just leave it at that, as saying politically incorrect things can get you in trouble with people who do not know and cannot trust.