Joola Tronix ACC

This user has no status.
This user has no status.
🏆 Top 1% Commenter
Well-Known Member
Oct 2019
1,127
677
2,756
Read 3 reviews
I like G1 for backhand and I can't use Joola tronix ACC for backhand because of it hardness and sticky. Difficult to use than G1 or C1 too much
Well. It's not sticky at all.
 
says Check out my Podcast Talkin' Smash!
says Check out my Podcast Talkin' Smash!
🏆 Top 1% Commenter
TeamJOOLA
Oct 2010
3,095
2,489
6,012
Read 12 reviews
36
Tronix ACC isn’t really a hard or sticky rubber. It’s only 47.5 degree hardness and it’s a tensor topsheet, not even grippier hybrid. It also has larger air pores so it has a springy but relatively softer feel with catapult.
 
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
Active Member
Nov 2017
568
855
1,956
No, it's harder and stickier. However, it's feeling weird if your backhand topspin has no strong technique.
With all due respect, but this is utter bs. I've played both G-1 and the Tronix ACC (still do...). Neither the G-1 or the ACC are sticky (i. e. tacky). Grippy, yes, very grippy in fact. But if the topsheet of the ACC would be sticky/tacky, you would be able to press the racket with the Tronix ACC-topsheet onto the ball and lift the ball up. You can't do that with the ACC, not even for a fraction of a second.
The Tronix ACC also doesn't feel harder overall compared to the G-1, even though they have the same sponge hardness at 47.5°. The ACC noticeably feels softer than the G-1 (or T05 for that matter), because

a) the topsheet of the G-1 feels "tougher", harder, because the rubber compound used for the topsheet of G-1 seems to be of a harder nature and also because a different pimple structure is likely used and
b) the sponge of the ACC has larger pores (see Matt's comment) than the G-1, which has rather tiny pores, resulting in a slightly harder and kind of "linear" feel for the G-1, whereas the ACC feels "bouncier" than the G-1.

The Tronix ACC is (therefore) also not a so called hybrid. It's a regular ESN tensor, albeit a very good (and perhaps underrated) one.
 
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
Member
Dec 2023
112
54
168
With all due respect, but this is utter bs. I've played both G-1 and the Tronix ACC (still do...). Neither the G-1 or the ACC are sticky (i. e. tacky). Grippy, yes, very grippy in fact. But if the topsheet of the ACC would be sticky/tacky, you would be able to press the racket with the Tronix ACC-topsheet onto the ball and lift the ball up. You can't do that with the ACC, not even for a fraction of a second.
The Tronix ACC also doesn't feel harder overall compared to the G-1, even though they have the same sponge hardness at 47.5°. The ACC noticeably feels softer than the G-1 (or T05 for that matter), because

a) the topsheet of the G-1 feels "tougher", harder, because the rubber compound used for the topsheet of G-1 seems to be of a harder nature and also because a different pimple structure is likely used and
b) the sponge of the ACC has larger pores (see Matt's comment) than the G-1, which has rather tiny pores, resulting in a slightly harder and kind of "linear" feel for the G-1, whereas the ACC feels "bouncier" than the G-1.

The Tronix ACC is (therefore) also not a so called hybrid. It's a regular ESN tensor, albeit a very good (and perhaps underrated) one.
Thank you for you info. So you are correct about ACC feels bouncier than G1. Sorry for used the wrong word "harder".
However, in summary for what all I means to ACC is difficult to use than G1, but it depends on each player style.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FrenchFrog33
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
Member
Mar 2025
6
4
24
Today I played with tronix acc max on my forehand for about 2 hours. My first impression is it lacks speed and power compared to fastarc G1. I really struggled to finish the points. Almost everytime I spin the ball my opponents easily counter atracked and won the point. Also this rubber weighs very similar with G1.
In conclusion tronix acc is a good spinny rubber but I think it is more suitable for backhand rather than forehand.
 
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
🏆 Top 1% Commenter
Well-Known Member
Oct 2019
1,922
934
3,383
Read 5 reviews
I played with the Tronix ACC on BH. I need more time with it, but I think its going to be my go to recommendation for newcomers. Since all the rubbers are expensive as f, and you can get those below 37€ per sheet here (with a modest 2 rubber discount). There is little competition for this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jikester
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
Member
May 2025
16
12
54
Tronix ACC is my favourite 47.5 Tensor rubber for backhand. It feels a bit softer than the more spin-based 47.5 rubbers like G1, Vega Pro or X. ACC is a bit more controlled and easier to play than the Vegas I played before, without sacrificing much spin or speed. The ceiling on full power strokes could be a bit lower than Vega X, but these balls are not that common on BH that it would matter for me. The advantage of easier activation is more important. Another benefit of the ACC is the blocking or countering, flat hit balls are just more controlled than with the Vegas.

Some lower league players in my club also like the combination of Tronix ACC for FH and the softer Tronix CMD (42.5) for BH. Imo Tronix CMD is just a much better rubber than the popular Vega Europe.
 
Top