This user has no status.
Well-Known Member
I used to hate carbon blades. But at a certain point, spin and consistency has its limits and speed of the game becomes very important. It is better to use your spin to maintain consistency than to use it to score points directly, and that is the approach to faster blades - get your spin to a level where you can make so many kinds of shots without missing the table.I tried a carbon blade, but found it challenging to learn techniques with it. So, I ended up sticking with my slowest blade.
(Interestingly) my coach wasn't interested when I offered it to him either. He actually prefers slower all-wood blades as well.
Maybe he shares your style of play or has a similar opinion on blades.
Many old school players who do not compete use slower all wood blades. With the older smaller balls, it was easier to keep the ball short with an all wood blade even with non-sticky rubbers, and the power deficit was compensated with spin effect. And if you are not forced to adapt to the new ball, many good players still play that way.
But when you have to train and practice a lot, the extra effort expended to keep the rallies going and the difficulty of getting speed while having easy short touch (produced with hybrid/sticky rubbers on faster blades) becomes important for offensive styles. OF course, some players can still do pretty well despite this extra effort, but when you see them compete with players using less effort, you can often see the difference.