What Are Hybrid Table Tennis Rubbers and Why Are They So Popular Nowadays?

[RobinAndres]

Depends a bit yes! Rxton 5 and LAC i tried boosted and unboosted but never really got to a full in depth review (pity) but I still have gtx pro at home and likely will continue at some point with Rxton 9 and so

A lot to test still in the world of rubbers and I want to do more blades as well, so I ll keep going!

Let us now when you try GTX pro. Do you think it is a good option for it's price? I'm searching for cheap rubbers that with boosting are competitive. I still need to try the LAC boosted since everyone say wonderful things about it.

 

[victormanriquey]

Will do! Im thinking of getting a durometer for next year to be a bit more accurate in my hardness assessments

 

[Archosaurus]

Will do! Im thinking of getting a durometer for next year to be a bit more accurate in my hardness assessments

Shore O is generally very reasonable for TT rubbers and measures in a reasonable way. I would suggest a Shore O durometer and to not try to make any kind of "conversions" between A and O, just measure as-is. It will give you an indicative number for most rubbers. You can usually expect a 50 to feel harder than a 45 and so on.

Shore A is fine for dense sponges, but the thickness of them is too low for a good reading, and it will be quite strange and nonsensical in very progressive, soft sponges. I would not suggest only buying a Shore A durometer. The numbers you get won't be as understandable as with an O durometer.

You could get both, but it will double the measuring time and not tell you that much more about the rubber because Chinese sponges are measured independently from the topsheet so you will basically never actually get the same numbers. O is somewhat less affected by that.

 

[victormanriquey]

Shore O is generally very reasonable for TT rubbers and measures in a reasonable way. I would suggest a Shore O durometer and to not try to make any kind of "conversions" between A and O, just measure as-is. It will give you an indicative number for most rubbers. You can usually expect a 50 to feel harder than a 45 and so on.

Shore A is fine for dense sponges, but the thickness of them is too low for a good reading, and it will be quite strange and nonsensical in very progressive, soft sponges. I would not suggest only buying a Shore A durometer. The numbers you get won't be as understandable as with an O durometer.

You could get both, but it will double the measuring time and not tell you that much more about the rubber because Chinese sponges are measured independently from the topsheet so you will basically never actually get the same numbers. O is somewhat less affected by that.

Thanks makes sense, will have a look

 

[Kilogramme]

None of this is scientifically verified, but:

The different National versions are more or less dense formulations of Seamoon with a dye. The order should be something like Black > White > Yellow > Seamoon. I don't know where Red, Brown, 2017 or any other obscure versions fall.

The peak effect lasts a day or two or so, then a stable high effect for 1 to 2 weeks (Haifu claims +8.5% for 1 week for Black), then drop off to nothing after about 3 to 4 weeks.

They all soften the sponge maximally as much (Maxing out at around 9deg softening for many sponges I've boosted 4-6 times to see where it reaches asymptote) although the stronger national boosters soften it faster, and denser sponges soften more per layer.

Black softens the sponge the easiest and Seamoon the hardest. However you need less of Black to get a similar elasticity effect as with Seamoon, so maybe there's a breakpoint where you get more elasticity than you get softening. I have no clue where the idea that Black softens the sponge less comes from; I find on average 1deg more per layer (2ml or so) than with Seamoon.

I've found on less dense sponges with Seamoon it can be as little as 1deg per layer, while on dense sponges with Black it can be as much as 3deg per layer.

In practical use I haven't noticed a real difference other than National boosters are stronger so you can get less added racket mass for the same softening and elasticity. Black and White are a lot stickier and much harder to evenly apply than Seamoon, and harder to drain back into the bottle. I haven't tried Yellow but under spectrometry it's identical to Seamoon so it's probably just a denser variant as well.

I read that on PROTT or Ali seller website I think about the white being between the 2. Can't remember. I see many opposite comment on Boosters in general. Depending on the application method we can have different results.
And The black softening less, is from this https://www.tabletennisdaily.com/forum/topics/booster-mega-test.26522/

 

[victormanriquey]

I read that on PROTT or Ali seller website I think about the white being between the 2. Can't remember. I see many opposite comment on Boosters in general. Depending on the application method we can have different results.
And The black softening less, is from this https://www.tabletennisdaily.com/forum/topics/booster-mega-test.26522/

All I can say on boosters is that the national yellow is thicker and stronger than the commercial version, I have them now both at home and tried them lately, seems like the national is more concentrated. Black or white haven't tried yet

 

[Kilogramme]

All I can say on boosters is that the national yellow is thicker and stronger than the commercial version, I have them now both at home and tried them lately, seems like the national is more concentrated. Black or white haven't tried yet

That is for sure, Nat is better than Seamoon.

 

[andymagata]

Great read! Thanks. Can I write out what I am thinking of right now? Is it the top sheet or the sponge what gives a tensor rubber it’s main characteristic? Is a tensor sponge just a regular dense “Chinese” sponge filled with holes, air or gas? A topsheet can be anti, pimpled, grippy or tacky? A sponge can be bouncy, linear or dampening?