This user has no status.
Member
Really very subjective. One can also ask, which makes more difference, replace a crappy playing venue or replace a crappy regular playing partner.
Now we know why the USA sucks at table tennis...Rubber. That's what hits the ball.
Dima showed Dan once what he could do with a beginner pre-made bat.Then you should get better performance from D09C than G09C on the dead blade. Also ‘performance’ is ability biased. A blade or rubber does nothing until used by a person.
A strong player is still way more likely to play better with a poor blade/good rubber combo or good blade/poor rubber combo than a weaker player.
If anything there was a point at which his equipment choices became more conservative. During the speed glue era the fastest blade he used was Rutis (after Violin and Acoustic), then he switched to TBS/TBALC before transitioning to the 7 ply wood Long 3/506 and finally settling on W968. He also switched from Tenergy to Hurricane on bh, and there was a period where he used TG3 fh and not H3Just an opinion, and yes one person does not represent everyone, but... in the case of
Ma Long, he used H3 throughout his career, but slowly upgraded his blade speed. He did not keep the same blade and upgrade the rubber speed. Although both are important, I think the rubber is more critical to the player's style.
It is hilarious to me that this is even a discussion. I invite anyone who thinks the blade plays a bigger role to build two rackets:To the extent blades matter, it is mainly due to personal preference, which perhaps explains why a forum full of EJs thinks blades matter so much. Rubbers objectively matter more for how much quality they can handle and produce.
There are technical adaptations you can make to produce quality with a harder or softer blade. But if a rubber is too soft or doesn't have enough grip, you will face a lower ceiling in how much quality you can put on the ball no matter what you do.
Why are you comparing Glayzer 09c which is a playable, though slow, rubber to a "dead blade"? The fair comparison would be comparing Glayzer 09c on a "good blade" to Dignics 09c on an all-around to off- blade.You get better performance out of a Glazyer 09C with a good blade then you will out of a Dig 09C on a dead blade.
DHS sponsorship of CNT meant he HAD to use a DHS FH rubber.Just an opinion, and yes one person does not represent everyone, but... in the case of
Ma Long, he used H3 throughout his career, but slowly upgraded his blade speed. He did not keep the same blade and upgrade the rubber speed. Although both are important, I think the rubber is more critical to the player's style.
1) premade blade with Dignics/Hurricane or their rubber of choice
2) their favorite blade but with premade racket rubber
and play matches with each one and compare the results. Guess what, it's going to be racket 1 that is much more playable.
DHS also makes many different rubbers. Ma Long can choose to switch between those different rubbers as frequently as he did with his blades, but he didn't. It seems the specific rubber plays a more important role than the blade at least in his case.DHS sponsorship of CNT meant he HAD to use a DHS FH rubber
Maybe, but why did he change his blades more than the rubber? Obviously, it appears the change of blade was making a difference not the rubber.DHS also makes many different rubbers. Ma Long can choose to switch between those different rubbers as frequently as he did with his blades, but he didn't. It seems the specific rubber plays a more important role than the blade at least in his case.