Latest reviews

The rubbers with best durability on the market. Get them
Speed
7.4
Spin
10
Durability
10
Control
10
Not much to say about them. regular table tennis shoes, the only specific thing is that they are very wide just like the old Ma Lin shoe
Comfort
8.9
Grip
8.6
Durability
8.6
Weight
7.2
Pros
  • control
  • fast when needed
Cons
  • a bit slow
This rubber is very good for people who control the game as there is lots of control and decent spin. It is generally quite slow but can be quite fast if hit hard. It is pretty durable from my experience. It is also quite good for beginners and I used it when I was playing regionally. It allows beginners to develop their strokes more. Overall very good control, decent spin and decent speed.
Speed
7.3
Spin
7.6
Durability
8
Control
9
Pros
  • Decently fast
  • Control
  • Spin
Cons
  • Durability
I have had this rubber for a few weeks and it is pretty good. The first thing I noticed was that it was not as fast as I expected, but had more control and spin. It has more spin than my bluefire m2 but has less feeling. It is slightly softer than my bluefire and has more control. It is not tacky at all. However, if you hit it hard enough the rubber will feel a bit harder.
Speed
7.9
Spin
9
Control
8.6
Pros
  • Comfortab!e
  • Stability
  • Balenced
Very comfortable blade (st handle), nice speed, nice stability and very balanced, this blade will optimized your rubbers. High quality blade. Worth your money.
Speed
8
Control
7.4
Hardness
8
Pros
  • Affordable
  • Spin
  • Fast
Cons
  • Blocking
I have used this rubber when I started playing table tennis, My DHS Hurricane 3 Neo (FH) was partnered with a Tenergy 05 (BH) and DHS PG-7 as the blade.
In terms of speed, This rubber is fast because of it's hardness. Mostly my flat drives go zoom when I hit the ball very hard. My only problem with this rubber is when I'm playing defense, It's kinda hard to block using Chinese Rubbers IMO. But overall it's a very good rubber, very suitable for players who have an all-out offensive style. I used mine for about 1 year and a half, and IMO it's durable.
Speed
8
Spin
8.5
Durability
8.5
Control
8
Pros
  • Incredible spin
  • Long-lasting!
  • Quite fast
This is a very welcome surprise. A rubber for those that likes a sticky surface, and a speedy sponge. It is not as tacky as a chinese rubber, and is speedier with a medium/low throw angle. Its like the description: Spin of China, speed of Euro, and touch of Japan. It plays more like a euro/japan-rubber than a chinese tacky H3/Neo.

This spin machine, i think, plays best on a speedier blade like carbon/fast wood. Tried it on Donic Diacon, Nittaku Redshank (thin carbon) and Stiga Rosewood NCT 7. Speed is very good for a tacky rubber. Very good for serves, service-return and top-spin play. Touch shots also very good. Recommended as a forehand-rubber. Its easily the best sticky rubber i have tried and incredibly fun to play with. When i played for the first time, i hit quite a few heavy sidespin-loops that had so much spin that it actually went past my opponents blade! I just laughed, and he too!
Speed
8.5
Spin
9.9
Durability
9.1
Control
9.1
Pros
  • Good Spin
  • Fair Price
  • Good Short Game
Cons
  • Fragile TopSheet
  • Hard to block
I'm referring to a DHS Hurricane 3 NEO rubber glued on the blade with VOC free glue (butterfly chack).
To my amateur hand I didn't feel this rubber lacking in any area of the game comparing to my previous rubber XIOM Sigma I Europe.
I have to admit I quite enjoyed the change. Of course blocking isn't exceptional with this rubber and it requires some precision.
The durability of the rubber is really low. When it contacts the table there will probably be a piece of it cut. The thing that saves it though is that it is on my forehand and I usually get the table with the backhand rubber. Next rubber I am going to get for my forehand will be h3 boosted because I'm curious, how a boosted rubber feels like. I have read people saying that this rubber was significantly different from a typical tensor, I didn't notice this to be honest. For me the rubber felt similar, as for it collecting dust, it does, like every rubber, not more. Also some people think this rubber is slow, I don't agree, I did try a TIBHAR EL-P and it felt slow comparing to H3 when looping.

Overall I think Hurricane 3 NEO is a fair rubber for the forehand and I suggest it to people looking for a cheap blade to begin with.
Speed
8.1
Spin
8.3
Durability
4
Control
6.8
Pros
  • light
  • control
  • blocking
Cons
  • mushy
Very picky rubber.

Avoid using this rubber if you are not a fan of mushy rubbers.

This rubber's sponge is very soft, almost to the level of mushy.
Because of that softness, it is good for blocking and control.
In my opinion, I would say this rubber is good for beginners or people who wanna switch to shakehand from penhold.

I used this rubber when I switched from penhold to shakehand racket.
At that time, I could not do any backhand basics of shakehand, so I chose this rubber.

At first, Although this rubber is quite bouncy, I could not perform aggressive backhand loop.
It was because of the softness of the sponge. The sponge prevents players from adding speed to the balls.
So, if you have confidence in your backhand skills, I would not recommend you to use this rubber. Go for Rakza X or Rakza 7.

However, I liked this rubber's softness since this rubber's blocking and control was so good.

I would not say that this rubber is for everyone.
Maybe this is for players who are not very confident in their backhand skills like me.
Speed
7
Spin
8.5
Durability
8.5
Control
9.5
Pros
  • price
  • very spinny
  • good short game
Cons
  • speed
Just boost it.

This rubber is made to be boosted.
I applied 2 layers of booster and this rubber became a monster in terms of balance of spins and speed.
Highly recommended to boost this rubber!

The other good thing about this rubber is that it forces you to place your feet in a proper position otherwise your balls would be slow and not spinny.
Good for training, I would recommend this for beginners in stead of Tenergy series, which is undoubtedly the most popular rubber for pros.

However, I think this rubber is also tricky rubber to use because of its tackiness.
When I loop or drive, I have to move my forearm very fast.
However, when you can hit balls with your maximum power, your loop and drive will be super spinny and super fast.
Because of its tackiness, it's also good for short games like stops, push and flick.

Overall, I really enjoy playing with this rubber and I think I won't change my FH rubber for a while.
Speed
5
Spin
10
Durability
9
Control
9.5
Pros
  • Spin
  • Speed
  • Control
Cons
  • Price
  • Durability
This rubber is great for backhand.It feels like I can't miss.Very good for every playing style, it has lower throw angle than Tenergy 05 rubber.
It feels soft,great contol,great spin ,good speed .
The biggest problem as all we know is price of Tenergy rubbers :D


Speed
9.4
Spin
9.2
Durability
8
Control
9.5
Pros
  • fast
  • flexible
  • good looking
Cons
  • not very durable
  • thin handle
A great blade to match any type of player! (except choppers)

180$ = Worth buying.

You can hit very fast balls without much effort and still have some control on small plays.
This blade goes great with Tenergy series or any tensor rubbers.
I personally like to use this blade with Chinese rubbers and it performs quite well.
When I loop the ball with this blade, I can hit the ball in the corner of table.
When I make small plays like stop, push or even flick, this blade gave me nice control on the ball.

Summery ; quite well made blade which goes well with any types of rubbers!
Speed
9.5
Control
9.2
Hardness
9.7
Durability
7.5
Pros
  • Long Lasting
  • Controllable
  • Non-hollow
Cons
  • Lack of Fastness
This blade is great for the developing player. It has a good feeling and I like how it doesn't have a hollow handle. It's not too slow yet not as fast as the carbon blade. It is very durable ( I already had mine for 3 years). The Primorac is a very good classic all-wood blade.
Speed
6
Control
8.5
Hardness
4.5
Durability
9
Pros
  • high speed
  • good control
  • unbreakable
Cons
  • price
I had this blade (Primorac Off+, which is on the photograph) since the last 15 years. ...one blade... It is expensive (in Germany ~120€) but the durability is amazing, nearly unbreakable. I flip out sometimes after hard matches and smack it against my upper leg and so on (nothing cool though) but the blade was at every time fully intact. The blade is very hard and stiff, so you can feel the ball touching via vibrating. It´s a fast blade, able to generate maximum speed but with good control. I think it´s perfect for players in middle distance with offensive topspin play style.
Speed
8.7
Control
7.7
Hardness
8
Durability
10
Pros
  • Straight Handle
  • Overall looping
  • Short game
Cons
  • Timing
  • Price
Having played with it for about 4 hours on 2 separate training sessions, here are my thoughts (playing with 2 Tenergy 05's):

Design & Handle: I really like the design with the phoenix print up front and the nice and classy straight handle. Nothing too out of the ordinary.
The straight handle is a big plus, especially compared to the flared one. It fits nice in the hand.
Serving: Great for serving. Low and spinny serves, short, half-long, long, you name it, very easy.
Short game: Best aspect of this blade. As this has ZL Fiber, and no carbon layers, you get a lot more feedback. The touch is amazing.
Looping: Very easy to generate a lot of power from short and mid distance. Also does the spin shots very well. You notice the control and forgiveness on every stroke. Timing needs to be accurate though.
Far away from the table: Some people complain about the lack of power, I don't really know why. Speed is more than enough. Counter topspins from far away are a joy. Surprised at how well the blade smashes.

Conclusion:
I was looking for a replacement for the DHS W997, which was a bit too powerful and lacked (with Tenergy 05 on the FH side) touch and control. This blade gives me the control and balance that I was looking for. I don't know why it isn't very popular, I don't know anyone who plays with it. Would definetely recommend it to a variety of players. If you have any questions, feel free to ask :)
Speed
9
Control
9.5
Hardness
5.4
Durability
8.3
Pros
  • Control
  • Spin
Nittaku acoustic is an allwood blade composed of limba, limba, tung-tree, limba, limba the limba ply being a soft ply makes the blade soft with great feeling. There is some variation in weight, mine is 91g which is a nice balanced weight to me.

The amount of vibration is great for me as a developing player and not too over the top which I felt with my older allround classic blade. While it is an offensive blade it is not too fast, but due to the limba plies it has good dwell and it is easy to spin the ball well. I'm using tenergy 05 2.1 on forehand and donic baracuda max on the backhand. It is quite heavy at 191g but you quickly get used to it.

I think I would be able to handle an even faster blade due to the slower backhand rubber, but I rather focus on heavy spin and upgrade speed slowly with time and this set up with the acoustic seems ideal for this goal. If you're a flat hitter then you may want to go with something different.

The handle is quite small so keep that in mind if you have big hands, this also means it can be a bit head heavy, which I'm still feeling but getting used to.

I'd highly suggest this blade to someone that has played for a while and developed their game but looking for something slightly faster and want more spin. Because of the softness of the blade it's good to keep in mind what rubbers you put on it as well as how developed your backhand or forehand is e.g. I'm using tenergy05 a fairly hard rubber on my forehand which is suited for speed and spin while the baracuda is slighly slower but is forcing me to spin more as gives me good control for the short game and blocking.
Pros
  • spin control
  • powerful play
  • feedback feeling
Cons
  • price
  • durability
very good rubber for spin-against-spin-actions, short serves with massive spin, short loops and long drive topspin strokes are possible with great arc in flight path! the ball pops out of the rubber at very high angles, so it is possible to close the blade very much and generate immense rotation. another advantage to other rubbers is the feedback feeling when you hit the ball hard, that means you can even change blade position at ball contact so the ball jumps not too high/low.
Speed
8
Spin
9
Durability
7
Control
9.5
Pros
  • Very Fast
  • Good Control
  • Quite Durable
I've been playing the Andro Rasant for 2 months now and I'm very happy with it. It's so fast but at the same time it's also controllable. It is not as spinny as a Tenergy but it's still enough to generate a lot of spin. This rubber suits perfect to me, it's good for short play, you can easily play counter topspin and also play very fast topspins.
Speed
9.5
Spin
8.5
Durability
8.5
Control
9
Pros
  • Speed
  • Control
  • Sweet Spot
Cons
  • Price
  • Short game
Hey guys!
Since February 2015, I've been using this flared blade with BTY Tenergy 05 on the FH, and Yasaka Rakza X on the BH.
Once you see the packaging it comes in, it is very clear why it costs £280. There is a nice look to the blade, with the colour coordiantion making it very attractive & once holding the blade, it has a very comfortable feel (even if you adjust your grip for certain shots).
Once rallying, you'll notice it has a very nice feel to it straight away and reminds me of the feel of the BTY Innerforce ZLC (somewhat stiffer but a fair bit faster).
FH(Rocket)- Even from my first hits I could really feel the ball sink in to the blade and making most of it's wide sweet spot. It took me a few practise sessions to get back into my complete rhythm of play but once I did, balls flew past sparring partners and the blade had more than enough power to hit past opponents.
BH(Need to be very consistent)- In my first few matches of using this blade, I found it very difficult to get more than one/two shots on per point. They'd always go too long or go into the net. However after some getting used to, it felt much easier to drive/punch past opponents and force them off the table. Backhand flicks were excelled- whether you wanted to put them down the line or produce heavy spin back, it was very easy.
Short game(Need very good touch) Due to the JM Super ZLC being so fast, touch play would not be easy to control at all. Balls were always going off the table due to the speed but it was heavy spin being produced. When wanting to do a dropshot, sometimes the ball would be picture perfect, sometimes the ball would just bounce off the blade and off the end of the table. Fortunately, this got much better after time and you feel well in control.
Finally, I'd recommend this blade to any offensive player for both BH/FH who is consistent. Even if you miss the sweetspot you still have a good chance of getting the ball back on. The dwell time enables the ball to literally 'sink' into the blade and produce tons of spin.
Speed
9.1
Control
8.4
Hardness
7.2
Durability
8.7
Pros
  • Amazing Control
  • Bang Impact
  • Like Composite
Cons
  • Expensive
For a while now, I have never been able to fully understand what the Nexy folk mean by "bang impact". I have always been a heavy topspin brush looper of sorts who even when I loop drive was basically doing a very thick brush with hard sponge.

I got the Nexy OLAM to test as part of an effort on mytabletennis.net to get testers and reviewers for the OLAM/Zealot. What I had heard about the Zealot had already left me not so much of a fan with comparisons to the YEO fairly common place. The Nexy designer described OLAM as a special blade that expels the ball and talked about things like "line factor", "point factor" and "bang impact" etc.. I wondered about the marketing hype but decided that hey, it was worth a shot to see if this blade was really special. Moreover, as someone who likes softer outer plies with dwell time, this could simply be a reaffirmation of my position that blades with hard outer plies help no one.

I got an OLAM (88g ST handle) from Nexy. It looked good and had this annoying red diamond stud on the handle but nothing so bad I couldn't use it. I stuck on MX-S briefly on the rubber and tried it out in a couple of matches. MX-S though tends to play similarly on just about every blade I put it on - the one thing we noticed was that the ball came out the rubber faster when I used MX-S and that blocking was amazingly easy. So the depth of contact made the blade feel fast but the rebound wasn't like rockets or anything like that. I almost felt sometimes that I couldn't hold the rubber on the blade (I had this experience later when serving with MX-P on the blade where the ball seemed to stay on the racket for such a short time I could hardly serve the ball over the net when brushing). This might be a result of the hard beechwood outer ply, an outer ply I have never played with before. Below the beech however, we have the usual spruce, limba and kiri suspects from looping blades, so this blade is a looper's blade where you have to work to get some impact beneath the top play, but the hardness of the top ply creates a lot of linear control.

I was going to write this blade off as another harder blade that I couldn't use but I was impressed by the blocking control. I decided that I couldn't do a review in good faith without playing with the blade for an extended period and that I had a tournament coming up and couldn't do so so I used the blade occasionally until the tournament I prepared for was over. I am now playing with it through out this week to better understand what the blade about - I am using Evolution MX-P rubbers on both sides.

This blade may have helped me see where I got the benefit of hard outer plies wrong. In a sense, one can argue that soft outer plies and some wood combinations promote brush impact and harder outer plies and some wood combinations promote bang impact. It's not that you can't do both brush and bang with any combination, but it seemed that the OLAM rewarded deep impact. Because the blade was so linear, I kept trying to increase the contact depth of my stroke and it seemed that the linearity of the blade made seeking a deeper contact depth rewarding. Brush topspin strokes work, but making harder contact works even better on topspin balls and with great control too. The MX-P felt like a good match because its high grip/dwell counteracted the feeling of slippage that I felt on the OLAM in general. And MX-P rewards contact depth as its sponge is relatively hard so I didn't feel that there was a serious risk of bottoming out the MX-P sponge on power strokes.

The OLAM itself is either a massive innovation or a hint to me that I have gotten the benefits of hard outer plies wrong. It might be the latter, but I highly recommend this blade to anyone who is currently a fan of brushy strokes and wants to improve the contact depth on their shots. Use it with extremely modern rubbers with high grip like Tenergy or Evolution or the slippage may drive you crazy if your contact depth is not high enough - the topsheet will almost entirely determine short game control and slippage. You will feel as if you have laser accuracy on many of your shots because of how the blade performs on bang impact. I will post some practice and match video from this weekend to close out the review later. Will also add any comments then.
Speed
8
Control
9
Hardness
7.1
Durability
9
Top