Latest reviews

Used it on the BH side on Tibhar Samsonov Force Pro.
Makes a loud sound when you hit hard.
Needs a little effort in blocking.
Deep pushes are very spinny.
When you connect the ball well, It goes like a rocket(very spinny and just fast enough to get you points)
Best suited for tactical players who like to set up points and not for those who like to win points by finishing the ball as early as possible.
Speed
6.1
Spin
8.7
Durability
9.2
Control
9.2
Pros
  • Fast
  • Cheap
  • Hitter blade
Cons
  • Worse looping
  • Small head Cpen
This is a fast all wood blade that workd best for hitters. I am using a cpen version and the weight is only 78g. I think this blade is too fast for cpen using unless you are using soft european rubbers or short pips. With chinese rubbers I cant land the balls on the table very well. Maybe its just my technique.
Speed
9
Control
6.5
Hardness
10
Durability
10
Good balls. Feels Similar to Xushaofa, but breaks a bit easily than Xushaofa.
Roundness
7.2
Hardness
7.3
Speed
7.3
Durability
7.8
Very good balls. they are durable and have good playing characteristics. However they just break in a second if you hit it with the edge of your racket very hard.
Roundness
9
Hardness
7
Speed
7.5
Durability
9
Pros
  • Good control
  • not expensive
  • Any rubber fits
Hi

I bought this blade over two weeks ago. Before that I have been using Primorac off- and I would like to compare it to it. The blade is faster but still maintaining good amount of control. This blade is an OFF-/OFF. It is not the fastest blade but if you don't always loop then it is a very good choice. The price is in my opinion very good as it is not very expensive especially for the quality they give you. The edges are sanded giving nice feel. The blade fits wide range of rubbers. I use Vega Japan and Europe and they play well. I use the straight handle and it is comfortable to use. Your hand feels free. Some people say that the problem with it though is that it is not the most durable though. For now I am fine.

It is a good choice for anyone. It might not be the best for a beginner but it depends on the person. Any questions just ask.
Speed
8
Control
9.3
Hardness
5.1
Durability
7
Pros
  • Feeling
  • Control
  • Spin
Cons
  • Price
  • rubber dependant
I decided to buy it when i got my hand on an Acoustic Carbon. This blade is amazingly controlable yet fast and spinny, i got an urge to know how tis lil brother would perform.

I wasnt impressed at first, when knockin ball on bare wood. I wasnt impressed too when i glued Omega IV Asia and Fastarc S1. Did not have confidence in FH strokes and neither on my BH, the feeling wasnt right.
I DO was impressed when i glued pair of rakza 7. The feeling is just a bit harder than my Nittaku Avalox P500, but more consistent, more pace. It had that dwelly dwelly feel, like time stops when you swing.
And it is strange since im used to play with either hard rubber 47+ and soft rubber 42- but it didnt go well.45 degrees is the magic number i think.

I does has a good amount of vibration but not exaggerated, sweetspot is ok. This blade really excels in short game and close to table loop and loop drives, it goes wherever you want. It is also very easy to vary the spin, due its high dwell and throw, i can close or open my bat without risk performing the same swing.Despite being a 5ply blade relatively thin, it has linear characteristics.

Does it worths the money? Yea. If you have a good budget and want more feel than performance, totally go for it, you will fall in love.
If budget is shorter and want more performance than feel, there is a bunch of 5plies that does it like Nittaku Avalox P500, Avalox P500, Xiom offensive S, Korbel, Infinity VPS V, Yasaka Extra/sweden, YEO, Latika and many others. The main competitor to Acoustic is the OSP Virtuoso- and as aint that impressed with acoustic, you should check OSP first ;)
Speed
8
Control
9
Hardness
4.5
Durability
10
Pros
  • Sweet Spot
  • Consistent
Hi,
I was able to play Carbonado 190 thanks to Stiga's lottery on facebook. I amvery glad for the opportunity.
The first thing I noticed was the low throw (even with t05). It is perfect block/punch blade. My first top spins where landing behind the table, that blade is really fast, but very consistent. My flips from bh had a lot of power, almost like full swing top spin. I am not playing with that blde bcause it is too fast for me and weights too much. I am used to ~84g blades. I would reccomend that blade to really avanced players. While I had no problems with keeping the ball on the table with Innerforce ZLC, the first balls with Carbonado where often too long, but if You can controll that monster it is really great weapon.
Speed
9.5
Control
7.5
Hardness
8.5
I used it for 3 consecutive months. it is very durable and good for practice and competitions.
Pros
  • good quality
  • good control
  • powerfull
For certain players this is a very(!) nice blade. You might be able to find it in variable weights; mine is 84 grams which is pretty light for such a powerfull blade.

It is fast and it has a nice look. I did hit the table a few times and it doesn't show any dents. I played with it for almost a month, changed rubbers a few times and no damage yet, so durability is good. It is a hard and flexible blade. It's a good blade for looping.

I would recommend it to a controlled looper that likes something light but powerfull.
Speed
8
Control
8.5
Hardness
7
Durability
9
Pros
  • good quality
  • good control
  • very durable
Cons
  • low spin
  • not enough tack
It's a good rubber, but it's different than Hurricane 3 (neo or not). It's not as tacky, so less spinny. It's also softer.

The bottom line is, you can do many things with this rubber; control is very good. In comparison with H3 it misses the ultimate kill shot. This might result in more matches won, but still, the ultimate kill shot, it is a very nice feeling.
Speed
7
Spin
6
Durability
9.5
Control
9.5
Pros
  • Round
  • Durable
Cons
  • low spin
  • comes short
For a plastic ball it's not bad. It is no way near a celluloid ball though. It arrives shorter than expected. It's hard to put spin on the ball. They are not as round as they should be. For a plastic ball, it is doable, because there are no good plastic balls yet.
Roundness
5.5
Hardness
6.5
Speed
5
Durability
8
Pros
  • Spinny
  • Fast when needed
  • Cheap
Okay.. If you want to know how this rubber affects me, then read the post I made :p

But yeah, the hardest thing rating this rubber is the speed.. It's really fast if you hit hard and good, but if you don't put the effort in it's kinda slow. So it got many gears to play. It suits me well because of the "accuracy" in the rubber.. Or I guess it's me that's accurate but the rubber helps me in this regard. So, first impression: Good forehand rubber for me.

Let's say I'll get back to this if I remember or want to add something hehe :)
Speed
8
Spin
10
Control
8.9
Pros
  • Loop
  • Price
  • Service
Cons
  • Nothing
This rubber is very good. I have just switched from using the Xiom Vega Europe and boy, was that an excellent choice. This rubber is a cheaper version of a tenergy. There is a lot of spin, control, and speed. There is nothing to not like about this rubber. As for receiving, it is good as well. The rubber is not as sensitive to spin as tenergy is. I highly recommend this to people who have used tenergy or want to try a rubber that is very similar to tenergy.
Speed
8.9
Spin
10
Durability
7.8
Control
9
Pros
  • Speed
  • Control
  • Not too hard
Cons
  • Vibration
  • Not the biggest
  • sweet spot
I bought this blade because of curiosity and also because I feel that in some shots my Timo Boll Forte lacks some hardness, especially after switching to the poly ball. I have played with it for ~2 months with some older Acuda S1 on FH and S2 on BH. My blade weighs 92g.

Speed

I noticed from the first shot that the PG-7 will deliver me a good amount of speed, which helps a lot in away from the table play and finishing shots, it's a strong OFF, if not a OFF+.

Control

I expected this blade to be quite uncontrolable, considering its speed and price, but I was pleasantly surprised. This blade has a very good amount of control, though not as controlable as my TBF.

Hardness

Harder than my TBF, but not a rock, allowing to have good spin on loops while keeping them aggresive.

Handle

At the first sight, the handle seems small, but this type of handle allows you to have a firm grip with your fingers on the rubbers, so this is not the story with the small handle on the Timo Boll Forte.

Durability

Until now no durability issues. I don't use edge tape on this blade, and the rubbers don't cover the full head of the blade. It only has a small bump because I have hit the edge of the table while serving. And also, this is a 23$ blade, so you may not be afraid to play, even if it breaks, you can easily get a new one, but I really doubt this blade will break fast.

Sweet spot

This is an all-wood blade, so it has a smaller sweet spot than a carbon blade. Your timing has to be better than with a carbon blade if you want your shots to be well placed.

Vibration

This is, in my opinion, the biggest minus of this blade. Yes, it has good speed, good control, nice dwell time, but it lacks a more solid feel. This vibration isn't helping you, it is irritating and kinda gives you a false feedback of what's happening while the ball is on the racket. And my blade is 92g, which is heavier than the average weight, so, theoretically, it should feel more solid than a lighter PG-7.

Strategy


The DHS Power G-7 is a blade that will suit a forehand-oriented aggresive player. This blade is pretty heavy has a large head, which makes it feel even heavier. Because of this backhand flicks become more difficult to make, and you don't have too much freedom of movement with the backhand.

Conclusion

The DHS Power G-7 is a cheap blade (~25$) that is able to replace a more expensive one. It stands in the range of OFF/OFF+, being able to deliver a good amount of power when needed, while having good control and dwell time. It will work better for forehand-oriented players that like to play mid-distance or away from the table. Because of large head size + the weight, the racket feels a little head-heavy, and the backhand flicks are harder to execute. Biggest minus of this blade is the lack of a solid feel, the blade having a quite strong vibration. It also doesn't have the sweet spot of composite blades.
Speed
8.7
Control
8.4
Hardness
6.5
Durability
8.7
Pros
  • Stability
  • Sturdy
This is the gold standard of non-showcourt tables. You can see them being played at the highest international level down to leisure games. New tables have a matte finish. Over years of use the surface may turn into a glossier one. The tables are solid and can be moved and stored on a daily basis. The bounce is even and consistent, even on the edges, altough the sound is different.
Bounce
7.1
Consistency
8.4
Pros
  • Sound
  • Softness
Cons
  • Spin
This is an unique rubber, one of a kind. It was one of the first rubbers with built-in glue effect, so everyone in Sweden tried it. It has great sound, kind of low arc, not so much spin, but a lot of feeling. It is difficult to describe, since there are no other similar rubbers that I'm aware of. It is also very difficult to get good backspin with on service receives. Time might have made this rubber obsolete, but I will always remember it fondly for the sound and loops.
Speed
6
Spin
5.8
Durability
6.1
Control
5.3
Pros
  • Tacky
  • Easier to remove
Cons
  • Thick
  • Slow
  • Unforgiving
If you have to attach your rubber to the blade, and make it last, look no further. This is the thickest glue I've tried. It also bonds the hardest. It is difficult to use, be careful and only brush the glue a few times, otherwise you'll have clumps of glue. It dries slowly, around 20 minutes. There are easier glues to work with, but they don't bond as good.
Pros
  • Control
  • Dwell
  • Soft
Cons
  • Service with it
Very solid blade that is amazing for all round plus. Perfect for blocks and counter. Easy to open up. Service is a bit more difficult than other blades as the dwell time is good.
Speed
8
Control
9.3
Hardness
5.2
Durability
8.5
Pros
  • Counter Topspins
  • Amazing Power.
  • Good On Block.
Cons
  • Too powerful
  • Sensitive 2 Spin
  • TooHeavy & Stiff
Not just designed for speed, but a lot of spin could also well easily be produced.

- Excellent for backhand punch shots and great for blocking
- Lots of spin on service, Great Rubber For Good Servers.
- Good For Players Who Play Spin.
- You Need A Good Technique To Control This Bat Since It Is So High In Power.
- Great Rubber For Offensive Players
- Strong surface that grips the ball well even when the ball is low
Speed
9.7
Spin
9.1
Durability
7.8
Control
8.4
Pros
  • Fast
  • not too heavy
  • Fast
Cons
  • Bit light
  • spin
Finally! Something that actually plays more like a celluloid ball. I tested it with Dan and Tom when they reviewed it and have used it a few times since. None have broken so far and all seem to be quite round. Bit of a weird surface which you have to see first hand to understand. It's also a bit glossier then other plastic balls and looks almost rough but doesn't feel rough. I really don't like the plastic ball when I'm comparing it to the old celluloid due to its heaviness and lack off spin. The g40+ feels lighter (some might say feels too light) I don't see this as an issue as you get used to it and would say all other plastic balls are too heavy. The speed however is its main asset it's quite a lot faster then all other plastic balls I have used and I've tried most of them. Butterfly (not g40) stag, nittaku, XFA to name a few. I feel it puts more fun into table tennis again. Which I found the other plastic balls took away after the celluloid ban. As for spin it's the same as other plastic balls and still not really very near the old celluloid balls but you can't have everything eh...Some people will complain that's it's too different to other plastic balls. Which I agree to to an extent as it is very different. However I think it's much better and it won't be long before this ball takes over when people realise how good it is.
Roundness
9
Hardness
7.9
Speed
10
Durability
8.1
Top