This user has no status.
I think this is a tacky rubber?Friendship Battle 11
Is there a rubber out there between MX-S and H3Neo prov?
I don't like all the boosting stuff and the last sheets of H3 had nearly to tackiness :-/
So I tried the MX-S (my backhand rubber) on the forehand and I think this could be an option.
But it would be better for me if the MX-S would be a tad harder and had a tad less catapult.
Any suggestions? Maybe Xiom Omega V Asia?
Is there a rubber out there between MX-S and H3Neo prov?
I don't like all the boosting stuff and the last sheets of H3 had nearly to tackiness :-/
So I tried the MX-S (my backhand rubber) on the forehand and I think this could be an option.
But it would be better for me if the MX-S would be a tad harder and had a tad less catapult.
Any suggestions? Maybe Xiom Omega V Asia?
Sorry to barge into your question again Amoc, but as for the OVA - yes, yes and yes ... (look to the left, if using the desktop). Well I use 2.0.
The description OhWell cited is more or less true, but to answer your question:
- MX-S was simply uncontrollable on my TB ALC, just too fast. I heard H301 is bit slower than TB ALC but similar construction.
- OVA has less catapult.
- OVA is more controllable over the net
- I find it quite linear
- has lower arc than T05
- does not get bouncy as T05 when pushing or returning the serve short.
- is closer to the "what you put is what you get" philosphy.
Really nice rubber with this special carbon sponge technology. Got it for almost the same reason (didn't want to play DHS).
Aside from MX-S, the incoming Vega Tour is like a harder MX-S but faster. Sponge is like a 39-40 degree H3. Throw is low.