I sincerely don't think you get the point. He or I can use the word tensor to mean a technology all we like and even you guys are correct in the history of the term you guys CAN'T say we are wrong. I gave you many examples of how a trademark name can become so common and people will use it regardless of how it originally was. I don't know you guys intention in correcting the usage of the term and insisting on its history which we don't give a damn. Thanks for the history lesson so let's move on ok?
You're very welcome. I like history as well. You are certainly free to move on. And even though you and some others don't give a damn, you are still missing the point, it seems.
Calling a lightweight jacket "Windbreaker" even though it might not have been produced by the trademark holder or calling a cheap tissue "Kleenex"
is not quite the same as calling the Mantra a Tensor. Calling pretty much any lightweight jacket "Windbreaker" or calling a no-name tissue "Kleenex", most of us would certainly know what is meant by it. And again, that's not really the point. See, there are all sorts of tissues out there; some are softer, some might smell very nice and so on. But the main purpose (or main feature) of a tissue is still to clean the nose, right?
But if someone calls the Mantra a Tensor or even Tensor-like, this person is attributing the topsheet of the Mantra some fundemental technological capabilities or features which it (per definition) simply does not have. A Tensor topsheet is high tensioned
and gives an additional spring effect, because ESN puts these organic substance between the molecules of the rubber-topsheet. The topsheets of the Mantra, Airoc, Mizuno, Tenergy etc. all have "only" high tensioned topsheets
without this additional spring effect; only the sponge of these rubbers is responsible for the spring/ catapult. I do think that this is a fundemental difference between these two types of topsheets and I do not think that this is too hard to understand.
But let's indeed move on now..