This user has no status.
🏆 Top 1% Commenter
Well-Known Member
Well-Known Member
Moderator
I said you would get a month for calling me "morally bankrupt". Feel free to test that. There is absolutely no reason why I should tolerate that on a regular basis. I have zero problem with people criticizing how I moderate as long as thwy are very specific about their issue, present their position, lwt me present mine, ans then we find a median or agree to disagreeHow funny of the said mod telling me to post away after threatening me in DM that I would get a month for calling him out [self-censored], which is contained in those posts.
You're doing exactly what BlopChock is calling you out for.
https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-hk/修身
(The Great Learning emphasizes that in order to bring peace to the world, one must first investigate things and extend knowledge, then cultivate one's will, rectify one's mind, and refine one's character, and finally regulate one's family, govern the state, and bring peace to the world. [4]
Therefore, Confucianism emphasizes that in order to regulate one's family and govern the state, one must first cultivate oneself. Zengzi also proposed that one must reflect on three things every day: whether one keeps one's promises to friends, whether one is conscientious in one's work, and whether one reviews one's knowledge. [5])
If you have substantive claims to make, please make them. I am getting tied of all this, the goal here is to actually gice you a forum to say something and resolve it. If you decide you dont want to utilize it, please say so. If you want to spend the time talking in generalities, do know that this is an abuse of my time.
As I have said earlier, I made overtures to you in PMs and you did not respond to a single one of them. I have posted the PM I made here so you cannot continue to hide behind what you claim is invisible. I als encourage you to publish anything you want including posts yoi have said I deleted in the past. I gave you my rationale for deleting them, but as others may have noted in your dealing with Matt Hetherington and Joola, you sometimes think that other people are lying when they tell you what they think or have experienced while presenting no hard evidence of this.
So I will ask again - present whatever you claim I have done that you think makes me someone who has treated you differently from how I would have treated another member and in a way that is unfair to you. I suspect after this discussion, it will be obvious to most people that I accommodate you way more often than not. That said, the main thing I ask is that you dont assume the moral high ground. Lecturing me on how to do my job is assuming the moral high ground. Casting aspersions on my character is assuming the moral high ground. Let's stick to what you and I have done, your explanation for it, and my explanation for it. Is that fair? Or is it too much to ask?
Again, if the goal of this is to insult me or anyone or the moderation team, that I will not tolerate. If the goal is to say I did aomething specific or even many specific things you think show that you are being treated unfairly, then i am all ears. But if you decide you are going tonstimplr lecture me, that will not work.
At the risk of repeating myself, what specifically have I done to you and what is your perspective on it? The main reason i am not reprinting any posts is not because I am hiding them or any such nonsense, it is because 1) yhe content is accessible to whoever posted it and 2) the idea that i should be lectured on how to behave in a rude fashion is not going to fly here.
Last edited:
