As one example, you have accused me of being compromised for taking the common sense position of siding with Matt Hetherington, who is a known public figure in table tennis circles when you make lots of posts insinuating he is laying without any hard evidence of pictures and when he actually goes out of his way to resolve conflicts between your experiences and his. And this commonsense position was reaffirmed by
@NDH this morning.
The first time I remember getting into
@BlopChock's bad graces was for telling him to use Google translate when he reported one of your posts. Since then, he has focused on many other things, and said that my discusing positively the lectures of Andy Fastboe (one of the men who went to jail for the Enron scandal) is a sign that inam morally bankrupt. I can understand why he woukd say that but I completely disagree. But since he hasnt presented anything else I will leave it at that.
Then ther is the
@pongfugrasshopper argument where he took issue with a post of yours and then insulted you rather than reporting your post. Then he later reported your post and I went in and cleaned up the thread to bring it back on topic. And you didnt like that someone had deleted
@pongfugrasshopper insulting you (which you didn't report ) and wanted to post it back and I deleted it again. And then you took it as a conspiracy against you and complained about it and reposted it and I banned you for it. I suspect back then I didnt realize that commentary on why a post was deleted was possible but I felt it was obvious that I deleted the post and I think you think my primary focus was trting to hid anything pongfu wrote rather than just getting thr thread on track. By all means since you use the way back machine, you can get and repost what pongfu said here since it still offends you so much. For me, it it was an issue that if there was any misunderstanding, it could have been cleared up in a conversation but you refused any conversation.
Feel free to bring up any situation that I have forgotten. All of theee things are just things that I cannot for thr life of me understand why anyone should be beyond a quick conversation to iron out differences and move on. But if you chose not to, that is fine as well. Just don't insult me and expect me to accept it.
And now you write:
*There is a Cantonese term for this exact scenario,
身有屎/body has shit, which corresponds to when the shit hits the fan.*
Alright. At this point, given the lack of your posting anything, I really do think you want to make yourself a martyr of some sort. In this particular case I have zero problem with that. No one will be fooled into thinking that someone who had received the most reported posts for political posting and posting untranslared posts without any serious bans is not a benefactor od aome degree of favoritism.
