Are the Galaxy N-series blades any good?

[ronz91]

Are the Galaxy N-series blades any good? Anyone with personal experience? More specifically the N9 and N10 blades.

 

[Der_Echte]

I had an N9 blade and it was suitable for spinning. I liked the 896 a lot better.

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

 

[ronz91]

896 is galaxy as well?

 

[anchorschmidt]

The N10 was my first blade. I would say that it can be classified as ALL in terms of speed. It not very flexible but not very stiff either. I would say that it is slightly on the stiffer side. The handle is pretty big as with all Galaxy blades but it fit very well into my hands. The head size is also larger than normal. However, the sweet spot is not that large. N10 has a precise feel to it. Very good for flat hits and blocking. Looping works just fine as well. Perhaps a touch slower on active shots. The speed difference is negligible IMO.

I have tried the Donic Waldner Allround (your blade) and the Galaxy N10 has a larger handle, a slightly larger headsize and a stiffer feel with similar speed.

The manufacturing quality was pretty good. Better than the lower end Stiga Blades IMO.

 

[ronz91]

The N10 was my first blade. I would say that it can be classified as ALL in terms of speed. It not very flexible but not very stiff either. I would say that it is slightly on the stiffer side. The handle is pretty big as with all Galaxy blades but it fit very well into my hands. The head size is also larger than normal. However, the sweet spot is not that large. N10 has a precise feel to it. Very good for flat hits and blocking. Looping works just fine as well. Perhaps a touch slower on active shots. The speed difference is negligible IMO.

I have tried the Donic Waldner Allround (your blade) and the Galaxy N10 has a larger handle, a slightly larger headsize and a stiffer feel with similar speed.

The manufacturing quality was pretty good. Better than the lower end Stiga Blades IMO.

Thank you!