says
Certified USATT Coach
says
Certified USATT Coach
I was taught old school Chinese way. Left foot always forward and right foot always toward the back. That way forehand you have a lot of room. Backhand, well, you just twist a bit and use your waist and wrist. And that's good enough.I finally understand why CNT players train FH to FH with their right foot in front or level with the left foot. I gave it a try as well and it became so, so much easier and faster to transition between BH and FH because it's basically the same stance, no stance changes required. Furthermore, the FH becomes faster because you rotate less in this stance. There's no need to over-rotate the body when the ball coming is not an opportunity ball - it's training this concept into the subconscious.
Open a thread, it is puzzling that one doesn't exist but we create our reality in this community.For some reason, we don't have a thread for European championships 2023 . Just wanted to ask you guys ... does Ionescu remind you of Kreanga's forehand ?
Haven't seen a windmill forehand in an european player since .. ...
I meant one with a straight elbow on contact Tony ! Aruna's is more "Nadal"-esquewindmill?
No one can beat Aruna
I agree with your position on technique wholeheartedly NL , what I wanted to point out is more "visually" it seemed very similar to Kreanga'sOpen a thread, it is puzzling that one doesn't exist but we create our reality in this community.
On your original topic, I think Ionescu doesnt have anything unique about his forehand per se and IMHO neither did Kreanga. Kreanga because of his athleticism and relatively small size managed to throw himself around and recover quickly, but in principle, technique is about bringing your athleticism to bear on the ball, not so much about fitting some textbook stroke, though there are things that can make it harder to hit the ball, there are lots of ways to swing with quality at the ball. I was reminded of this yesterday when I saw a video with a high level player coaching a good player to change his forehand and it was interesting to see what changes were being encouraged. I wasn't 100% convinced that the forehand was massively improved if it was improved but I am nothing compared to that coach and everyone hits the ball differently, we just sometimes pretend that differences in athleticism and game reading skills are ultimately technical because that is what we can see.
Well ... I still have my Troublemakers jerseyttmonster,
You gunna do 888 Championships this fall?
I will be doing the LA Open this fall I think, as well as the OCTTA Seniors in Oct.
Aruna is awesome! Dan should do a video with him.windmill?
No one can beat Aruna
Well ... I still have my Troublemakers jersey... I saw the same one on NL in one of his videos here ... lets see how health and form holds till then ....
I tested it for another night, think it offers faster transitions and is better suited to close table topspin play especially against quick switches down the line from the opponent after BH-BH. The transitioning is really much faster. But it's kinda useless otherwise. I tried it in matches and played a lot worse. I very much prefer my usual FH loop otherwise, it's a lot spinnier and powerful with more body rotation.I was taught old school Chinese way. Left foot always forward and right foot always toward the back. That way forehand you have a lot of room. Backhand, well, you just twist a bit and use your waist and wrist. And that's good enough.
However, I think the new way is to be parallel. Like you said, close to the table, especially for Chinese women, it is all about transitioning FH to BH to FH to BH.
I am set in my way. I cannot change the way I stand nowadays.
It Is useless because you aren't using your feet the right way on the strokes, if you are (jumping into backswing and lunging on forehand and bowing on backhands), the quality loss is minimal and the transitions are definitely much much fasterI tested it for another night, think it offers faster transitions and is better suited to close table topspin play especially against quick switches down the line from the opponent after BH-BH. The transitioning is really much faster. But it's kinda useless otherwise. I tried it in matches and played a lot worse. I very much prefer my usual FH loop otherwise, it's a lot spinnier and powerful with more body rotation.
Maybe you just need to practice a bit more. I know that standing parallel is the more modern way with 40+ plastic ball. I, personally, just am too lazy to change my habit, for now. Until it impedes my progress, I tend to resist changes.I tested it for another night, think it offers faster transitions and is better suited to close table topspin play especially against quick switches down the line from the opponent after BH-BH. The transitioning is really much faster. But it's kinda useless otherwise. I tried it in matches and played a lot worse. I very much prefer my usual FH loop otherwise, it's a lot spinnier and powerful with more body rotation.
Out of curiosity what angle is your right foot to the incoming ball during the FH backswing when your feet is parallel?It Is useless because you aren't using your feet the right way on the strokes, if you are (jumping into backswing and lunging on forehand and bowing on backhands), the quality loss is minimal and the transitions are definitely much much faster
In almost every TT stance, both feet should point outwards, but they can point forward as well as long as you twist on the balls of your feet when backswinging.Out of curiosity what angle is your right foot to the incoming ball during the FH backswing when your feet is parallel?
So I tried having my feet pointed much more forward (maybe 1o clock?) yesterday and this might be the issue. I usually loop with my right foot pointing sideways at around 3 o clock with it placed behind my left foot.
Yep I guess I found my problem, maybe it was not so much the parallel stance but the right foot orientation.In almost every TT stance, both feet should point outwards, but they can point forward as well as long as you twist on the balls of your feet when backswinging.
You can but it takes practice to twist into it - the advantage of twisting is that twisting back feels natural on the follow through but it isnt a must. As long as you develop smooth connecting movements, there are options in footwork but they have to deliver solutions fast enough at the level you play.Yep I guess I found my problem, maybe it was not so much the parallel stance but the right foot orientation.
I will try having feet parallel and still pointed at around 2-3 o'clock next session.
Like what you said, there are some significant advantages in transition speed with the parallel feet position.
Now that you mentioned it, I think the reason why the feet pointed forward doesn't work as well is because you cannot lunge in that feet position.
Thanks, I understand the problem more deeply and know what I have to do now.You can but it takes practice to twist into it - the advantage of twisting is that twisting back feels natural on the follow through but it isnt a must. As long as you develop smooth connecting movements, there are options in footwork but they have to deliver solutions fast enough at the level you play.
okayI meant one with a straight elbow on contact Tony ! Aruna's is more "Nadal"-esque