i ask about it, because rating is actually not visible just by looking at someone play. it is the overall ability how someone can perform on weekly basis against all kinds of players. some players with good technique look like 2000usatt, but play like 1600, because under pressure and against all kinds of different playing styles their technique and mind falls apart. while some players may look like 1600 players but perform like 2000 in actual matches, because their tactical level and experience is way higher then their form alone. this is where my question comes in about how those players choose what rubber and hardness. so seeing you in actual matchplay would make it easier to relate to some terms you use in this guide.- In germany when i was at borussia dusseldorf they told me my rating would be around 1700-1800 TTR which roughly translates (if I can trust my american contacts and AI) to a low 2000ish USATT
- In the netherlands where I play, I won a doubles tournament last january (I was the attacker and my partner the defender) which was until 1460 dutch elo, and only lost a few sets in 5 matches
For the other topic, technical abilities, is there something you'd like to know in particular? I can try to tape that as well in detail!
for me those hard and tacky rubbers -no matter from wich company- are more about the footwork someone has to actually be able to use them. and footwork is not only measured by drills in training but your ability in reading the ball and how fast you can make the right decision and this is more visible in real match play
anyway great effort and thank you for the guide!