DHS Inner Carbon Blades Comparison: Sun Yingsha, Wang Chuqin, Long 5 & B2X

[victormanriquey]

Do you think the yinhe would do the job?
As for why inner alc, I’m going to use this blade for quite some time, so inner alc will help in future, also there’s that sweet spot advantage. Rn I’m at low intermediate 🙂
Also 8 80 choose 37 or 38 hardness? These rubbers are only for a short time say 7-12 months at a max, and I think they will help me develop my game better.
Also note : The sanwei has inner alc but with koto outer ply, how will this work out?
Thanks🙂

The yinhe 05 is pretty fast, feels a bit more outer and is KLC, so may be too much too handle even with slow rubbers, depends on a lot of factors

Id usually not immediately recommend inner carbon to a low intermediate but if you want it for the long term, then maybe a slower inner can work, for example something like the donic appelgreen (very soft carbon) but then budget.

8-80 Id choose 38 for FH (personal taste), but 37 can work too, bit softer, bit livelier, less end power, probably fine too

Koto outer feels different than limba outer, crispier, more direct, harder, some love it, some not, its related to personal taste and play style.

My gut feeling without knowing all the details of you, your game, technique and etc, is that better take a medium 7ply like PG7 or Fextra (budget, but many other more expensive 7 ply who can work too) and stick to it 6-12 months, you can always go to inner Otherwise choose a soft carbon or non-carbon composite

 

[Myth]

You can say I’m on the low intermediate level of table tennis.
My BH is my stronger side—I can generate good sidespin, full ghost serves, and fast /moderate topspin on serves and third balls with medium speed. (Fast returns I just block or sidespin on them) My FH is less consistent, with limited spin and an inconsistent / easy to block loop. All this I can do with a cheap 10$ premade from Stag with mildly tacky top sheet. 🙂
Also, I have a strict budget and I’m going to use this blade for quite some time, so I think inner alc will help in future, also there’s that sweet spot advantage too.

The yinhe 05 is pretty fast, feels a bit more outer and is KLC, so may be too much too handle even with slow rubbers, depends on a lot of factors

Id usually not immediately recommend inner carbon to a low intermediate but if you want it for the long term, then maybe a slower inner can work, for example something like the donic appelgreen (very soft carbon) but then budget.

8-80 Id choose 38 for FH (personal taste), but 37 can work too, bit softer, bit livelier, less end power, probably fine too

Koto outer feels different than limba outer, crispier, more direct, harder, some love it, some not, its related to personal taste and play style.

My gut feeling without knowing all the details of you, your game, technique and etc, is that better take a medium 7ply like PG7 or Fextra (budget, but many other more expensive 7 ply who can work too) and stick to it 6-12 months, you can always go to inner Otherwise choose a soft carbon or non-carbon composite

 

[victormanriquey]

You can say I’m on the low intermediate level of table tennis.
My BH is my stronger side—I can generate good sidespin, full ghost serves, and fast /moderate topspin on serves and third balls with medium speed. (Fast returns I just block or sidespin on them) My FH is less consistent, with limited spin and an inconsistent / easy to block loop. All this I can do with a cheap 10$ premade from Stag with mildly tacky top sheet. 🙂
Also, I have a strict budget and I’m going to use this blade for quite some time, so I think inner alc will help in future, also there’s that sweet spot advantage too.

All good, then take the 8-80 37 and M2 medium and all good, for the blade, there is many options, I'd go for limba/ayous and not too expensive so if it breaks it's easy to replace (or if you end up preferring 7 ply)