Experience with some other Loki rubbers - Arthur China, GTX Pro (inc)

This user has no status.
This user has no status.
Member
Dec 2024
9
15
24
I personally found Telson 100 uninspiring without booster, but a lot of others seem to like it.

But after boosting, it has tremendous rebound for me.
As I said, I don't want to boost my rubbers and coming from H3 Neo 37 on the BH, I like the extra punch of the Telson compared to the H3. If I want to have a "Telson" with more rebound, I would just go straght to an ESN or Japanese rubber with 48 degree+
 
This user has no status.
You never tested LAC on bh?
I found it an awesome substitute for H3 on bh. Although i played with it on an outer alc.
Will test it on my inner after our season.

Maybe i have to give the W81 another chance. I liked the handle. The only issue i had with it, that it was a little bit to direct for an inner and its vibration felt a little bit off.
Probably gonna compare it again with my atletico power.

Btw as a fellow german, in what region are you playing?
 
  • Like
Reactions: mattlamperouge
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
Member
Dec 2024
9
15
24
You never tested LAC on bh?
I found it an awesome substitute for H3 on bh. Although i played with it on an outer alc.
Will test it on my inner after our season.

Maybe i have to give the W81 another chance. I liked the handle. The only issue i had with it, that it was a little bit to direct for an inner and its vibration felt a little bit off.
Probably gonna compare it again with my atletico power.

Btw as a fellow german, in what region are you playing?
I never tried the LAC on my BH. Maybe I will give it a try after the season.
The 75 Inner also feels very direct for me, this is why the W81 worked so good from the start. The W81 also have a very good weight balance, my setup weights 189g, but does not feel head heavy or heavy at all.

I am playing in the South (BW)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Attitude
This user has no status.
I never tried the LAC on my BH. Maybe I will give it a try after the season.
The 75 Inner also feels very direct for me, this is why the W81 worked so good from the start. The W81 also have a very good weight balance, my setup weights 189g, but does not feel head heavy or heavy at all.

I am playing in the South (BW)
Thats true the weight balance is awesome of the blade.
Hm i guess the telson must reduce the weight quite a bit. My current setups all result in smth around 200g.
Maybe i put Telson on the try list as well.

For me it is a great feedback to see someone with the same equipment or at least comparable, depending what i play with, reaching that high. I am close to 1700 now and will probably reach it this season because im playing in the upper bracket of the Bezirksoberliga now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mattlamperouge
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
Member
Feb 2024
222
138
449
Hi,
Over the last 12 month I had the chance to test some Loki equipment and I would like to give you a summary of my thoughts.

Short summary about myself: I have a German TTR which went up and down between 1730 and 1900 in the last years, playing style offensive, dominant forehand, combined with a good footwork.

All the equipment which I tested did not get modified (boosted) and I also do not plan to boost.

My current setup: Loki W81 Pro Inner, FH: Loki Rxton 9 (H39), BH: Loki Telson 100

Loki Rubbers:

Loki Rxton 9 (H39)
: I tested the Loki Rxton 9 on several of my blades (DHS H301, Sanwei 75 inner, Yinhe Pro 11s and the W81 inner) and it replaced my previous FH rubber the “new Sanwei Target National” STN (International version and Chinese version medium-). The main drivers for the change are the longer dwell time and slightly higher arc, which helps me to be able to play balls with higher quality out of position. The speed on lower power shots is lower than with the SNT, my personal reachable end speed is kinda the same. For my playing style, the spin in server, short game, top spin etc. is on the same level and I can adapt quickly after 2 trainings sessions between these two rubbers.

Loki Rxton 5: This would be my go to FH rubber from the Loki brand, if the 9 would not exist. I really like the dynamic of the rubber and it pairs really well with the DHS H301, W81 inner and all wood blades like the Stiga Infinity VPS and Sanwei Fextra. For my level and playing style, I would also choose this rubber over an unboosted H3 Neo provincial 40 degree, which I also tested.

Loki Rxton 3: I tested the Rxton 3 (red) as BH rubber and had in mind to replace my BH at this time (H3 Neo 37 provincial). It is a little bit more bouncy than the H3 Neo, but I could adapt after 2 sessions and use the Rxton 3 without any issues. The rubber worked very well on the W81 inner, Sanwei 75 inner and DHS Bo B2X. I tested it also for one session on the Yinhe V14 pro. The blade is fun in training, but the in gameplay to fast, therefore I cannot give you any thoughts about “how the rubber works on outer blades”.

Loki Arthur China: I tested this rubber on the DHS H301 and Bo B2X before the Rxton 9 was available in Germany. I have mixed feelings about this rubber, I really like it in the open play and how easy it is to activate the rubber (counter loops, blocking, etc), but I never got a good feeling in serving, the receive game (especially long serves) and the short game. Because of this, I stayed with my STN.

Loki Rxton 7 (37): I tried the 7 on several blades, but the soft feeling, combined with the sticky surface did not work for me at all, so I stopped the testing already after one session.

Loki Telson 100: The Loki Telson 100 is the H3 Neo 37 Provincial BH replacement I was looking for a long time. Yes, the rubber is hard and it feels also kind of dead on passive strokes, but this is the same for the H3. The lost of the stickiness comes with a win on the dynamics of the rubber. When putting force in the strokes, the rubber rewards it with good quality shots, without loosing the controlled feeling of the H3. Open ups are more easily, because the support is better for my technic. Defensiv shots are also very stable. I only tested it on the W81 Inner and the rubbers works excellent for me on this blade.

Side Node: On the journey to my current setup, I also tested other rubbers which I did not mention: ESN, Chinese and Japanese rubbers.

I also have a the Kirin K1 and K3 rubbers unopened at home, but I will not be able to test it mid season.


Loki W81 Pro Inner:

The DHS H301 was my favorite and main blade for a long time. I really like the gears and the rewards of blade. A shoulder injury let me start looking into a new setup, which supports me a little bit better on my strokes. Adding different rubbers with more catapult did not work for me.

I thought I found my perfect blade with the Sanwei 75 Inner, but after a few month I had to admit, that this blade is to much for me on bad days. I made to many errors, especially when I was out of position.

With this in mind I started to look for an inner force style blade, which supports me better on bad days but keeps most of the strength. The limba surface keeps the ball a little bit longer than the koto surface of the 75 inner. The longer dwell time helps me on bad days to compensate weaker footwork. The downside is the speed of the blade, I have to work a little bit harder.

I own 2 W81 Pro Inner, 90 and 91g FL.

As I said, I am using the Rxton 9 and Telson 100 and it is a great setup. I read, that also Loki sponsored players are using this combination with Loki blades.

I also paired the blade with G1 (Max and Super Thick) on FH and DHS Goldarc 9 (37) on BH. This also works very well, but the MAX G1 is a little bit to bouncy and soft with the limba surface. Other Chinese Rubbers like Reactor Hyper Power, Big Dipper and Hurricane 3 Neo are also a good choice, based on the personal required characteristics.

If you want to know anything about the mentioned Loki equipment, feel free to ask.
You're one of few people that tried the goldarc 9 on bh. How does it compare to telson 100 or g1?
 
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
Member
Dec 2024
9
15
24
I would love to see some gameplay with that setup! Since How long are you playing with W81 inner? Its the last version? How does the handle look after sweat absortion?
How many sheets of Rxton 9 did you use? Hows Durability and consistency? Same for telson 100.
Hi @mattlamperouge
I was able to take some photos of my W81s. The left one is the older blade. I hope you can get an impression of the look after the sweat absortion.
The Rxton 9 on the 11s pro is a 3 month old, well played sheet. As I said, I think the topsheet holds long.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1729.jpeg
    IMG_1729.jpeg
    1.7 MB · Views: 58
  • IMG_1731.jpeg
    IMG_1731.jpeg
    2.1 MB · Views: 59
  • IMG_1732.jpeg
    IMG_1732.jpeg
    1.6 MB · Views: 57
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mattlamperouge
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
Member
Dec 2024
9
15
24
Thats true the weight balance is awesome of the blade.
Hm i guess the telson must reduce the weight quite a bit. My current setups all result in smth around 200g.
Maybe i put Telson on the try list as well.

For me it is a great feedback to see someone with the same equipment or at least comparable, depending what i play with, reaching that high. I am close to 1700 now and will probably reach it this season because im playing in the upper bracket of the Bezirksoberliga now.
I found out for myself, that a good weight distribution helps me more with my shoulder injury, than a leight, head heavy blade.

I am glad to read, that you are going up towards 1700.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Attitude
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
Member
Dec 2024
9
15
24
You're one of few people that tried the goldarc 9 on bh. How does it compare to telson 100 or g1?
I never really tested the G1 on the BH, but I can try to compare these 3 rubbers.

The G1 is the rubber with the most rebound/catapult. This means, very passive strokes always found the way over the net for me. The G1 has more grip than the GA9 and equal to Telson 100. In the passive game, the GA9 and Telson 100 gave me a safer feeling, than with the G1.

Telson 100 and GA 9 booth need to be played active. The difference is, that the GA 9 has a soft topsheet, which holds the ball very long. This gives you a very good control on blocking, counters and flips. The quality of the shots is medium. The Telson 100 has a more direct feeling and gives more qualities in the shots on active play than the GA9. Openings on heavy underspin are very comfortable to play with both rubbers. The short game is also good, but the Telson 100 is a little bit better because of the hardness. The soft topsheet and longer dwell time of the GA9 also supported me better in out of position situations.
One of the biggest disadvantages for me of the GA9 is the fact, that hard/fast balls are directly hitting the blade. The softness might be the reason for this. This leads for me to unpredictable behaviour in stress situations.
On the other hand, the topsheet is very spin insensitiv and supports the control game.

The weight of the G1 (superthick) is kind of equal to the Telson 100, the GA9 (2,1) sheets are heavier.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mattlamperouge
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
Member
May 2023
400
248
1,643
Hi @mattlamperouge
I was able to take some photos of my W81s. The left one is the older blade. I hope you can get an impression of the look after the sweat absortion.
The Rxton 9 on the 11s pro is a 3 month old, well played sheet. As I said, I think the topsheet holds long.
They look really good! How would you compare both setups, Big dipper vs Rxton 9
Moon Speed vs Telson 100
 
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
Member
Dec 2024
9
15
24
They look really good! How would you compare both setups, Big dipper vs Rxton 9
Moon Speed vs Telson 100
Sorry, I did not spend enough training/test time with the dipper/moon setup I order to be able to compare these two swetups seriously. I will come back to your request, if this will be the case.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mattlamperouge
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
New Member
Aug 2018
2
3
5
I recently received my latest delivery of LAC from AliExpress, and it feels noticeably different from what I'm used to. The topsheet is more translucent compared to the typical opaque look (the older one is on the right in the photo). There’s also no stamp on the sponge, and it’s not as tacky as usual.

On the plus side, the bond between the sponge and the topsheet seems stronger. The topsheet doesn’t separate from the sponge as easily as before, which might mean no more bubbles.

Could this be from an older batch, or is it just a dud? All three sheets from this delivery look the same.

Im going to hit with it later today, hopefully it plays the same.
 

Attachments

  • WhatsApp Image 2025-01-01 at 12.30.35 (4).jpeg
    WhatsApp Image 2025-01-01 at 12.30.35 (4).jpeg
    149.9 KB · Views: 37
  • WhatsApp Image 2025-01-01 at 12.30.35 (4).jpeg
    WhatsApp Image 2025-01-01 at 12.30.35 (4).jpeg
    149.9 KB · Views: 41
  • WhatsApp Image 2025-01-01 at 12.30.35 (3).jpeg
    WhatsApp Image 2025-01-01 at 12.30.35 (3).jpeg
    214.1 KB · Views: 39
  • WhatsApp Image 2025-01-01 at 12.30.35 (2).jpeg
    WhatsApp Image 2025-01-01 at 12.30.35 (2).jpeg
    75.9 KB · Views: 37
  • WhatsApp Image 2025-01-01 at 12.30.35 (1).jpeg
    WhatsApp Image 2025-01-01 at 12.30.35 (1).jpeg
    142.3 KB · Views: 34
  • WhatsApp Image 2025-01-01 at 12.30.35.jpeg
    WhatsApp Image 2025-01-01 at 12.30.35.jpeg
    94.6 KB · Views: 32
  • WhatsApp Image 2025-01-01 at 12.30.36.jpeg
    WhatsApp Image 2025-01-01 at 12.30.36.jpeg
    148 KB · Views: 35
Top