This user has no status.
This user has no status.
Tibhar MX-D vs. Stiga DNA Hybrid (or Platinum) M or H?
- Thread starter FrenchFrog33
- Start date
This user has no status.
Well-Known Member
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
Member
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
Well-Known Member
I wasn't too impressed with the Stiga Hybrid M. So I added a layer of booster, but it still doesn't feel very good.
The rebound seems too low, and it seems like the ball is falling into the net too often.
The rebound seems too low, and it seems like the ball is falling into the net too often.
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
Well-Known Member
This user has no status.
Member
I tried DNA Platinum H 5 times ~2 years ago just after I finished with MX-D (which I played for a little bit more than a year). So my impressions are not really fresh.
MX-D felt a little bit havier for me, slightly faster (or maybe easier to get that speed out of it). Close to each other in terms of spin, I guess. Short game was better with DNA, flat hits too.
Thing that I didn't like in MX-D, that it didn't give me any options, like I should produce certain movement on certain ball, especially noticable on a first loop against underspin. That made me think all the time about what and how should I do, my old reflexes didn't work with it well. On a contrary, with DNA Platinum H I could produce weird returns (somewhat like Moregard does
). I'm not really sure why I changed it. Definitely not something bad in its performance, just didn't like something in how it feels, maybe because it forced me to produce too many weird strokes or maybe K3 was a little bit cheaper
This user has no status.
Member
Mx-d and stiga dna hybrid m and H are in totally different categories. Mx-d is a total power housem while the hybridm is a very controlled rubber that you will not blast anyone off the table with.
Similar threads
