http://www.rsc.org/suppdata/jm/c2/c2jm33686c/c2jm33686c.pdf
A very relevant pdf. Well almost.
This report is about nano tube sponges. I have no idea what a nano tube sponge is but JUIC claims to use nano-tube technology.
Not much is said how the test were conducted except that the test were cyclic. This means the sponges were compress to %50 and then released and in some cases for a few cycles.
The graphs show what we in the testing industry call stress vs strain curves. Pressure is the y scale and % compression is the x scale. Notice how the pressure while compressing is greater than the pressure while releasing. If the sponge was efficient the pressure should be the same extending and retracting. Therefore the area inside the loop is proportional to lost energy. It looks like the area inside cycle loop for mineral oil is larger than area inside the vegetable oil cycle loop.
Alcohol looks like it has the smallest area in its cycle loop but the scale is different so it is hard to compare.
The 3rd page show the times for the cycles measured in minutes. Obviously this is useless to TT players where the sponge is compressed and released in around 1 millisecond.
It looks like vegetable oil actually works better than mineral ( a paraffin ) oil in this test because the area side the cycle loop is smaller than that of the mineral oil cycle loop.
The 4th page shows the sponge being compressed in air. Again the testers screwed up because they compressed the sponge to 70% instead of 50% but if you notice that the pressure only went to less than 0.4 MPa at 50% instead of 0.6 MPa for the oils I bet the area within the cycle loop would be smaller, more efficient, than that of the oils. This would suggest that boosting with any oil would not make you sponge more efficient but it is hard to know what would really happen if the cycles were only 1 millisecond long instead of minutes.
BTW, one of the reasons the air cycle loop loses energy is that compressed air heats up. Since the tests are conducted on a minute time scale there is plenty of time for the energy escape. In a one millisecond ( dwell time ) cycle there would be little loss due to heat transfer.
What TT players need is a similar test conducted on sponges we know and at a millisecond cycle with time resolution in the micro seconds. Then we would really be able to compare sponges and boosting methods.
I just wanted to share how things are tested in industry.
Edit, I found more about the testin
http://www.academia.edu/4969445/Elastic_shape_recovery_of_carbon_nanotube_sponges_in_liquid_oil
It looks like they saturated the sponges so the oil had to be squeezed out of the pours of the sponge.