This user has no status.
This user has no status.
Well-Known Member
Although i am not quite sure why we are comparing non boosted H3 to anything (H3 unboosted is not a rubber for anyone who has an attacking playstyle and is capable of looping and topspinning propperly), but BD just not comparable to H3 unboosted^^
Some amateurs say BD is close to H3 boosted but in my experience BD lacks the spin and the same arc of H3.
But guys srsly, if are not capable of giving average parameters, then at least try it with different kind of shots or dont do it at all. With no technique in the world you are capable of shooting a ball faster with an unboosted H3 than with a BD - period.
Sadly i havent tested the N80. The reason for that was, that is has the same hardness than the GTX Pro and the sponge seems to be pretty much the same so i didnt expect much difference here.
Actually the only rubber i am still curious about is the T3. The sponge has way bigger pores and is softer too. The only thing that bothers me here is the lower spin rating by Loki itself. If the spin level is srsly below the GTX Pro then this is by far not a good rubber.
That is true for H3. H3 Neo in my experience is not that bad after 2-3 days.