Zhang Jike: "Those who rely primarily on a Backhand system, can not reach the top"

says Passionate about table tennis 🏓
Haha of course no one said that. They just felt that way and supported their arguments with Xu Xin and Joo Se Hyuk (examples that didn't work at all).
You’re fighting a ghost at this point — literally inventing arguments I never made. They weren't the best examples, I admit, but it went right over your head. For the third time: my point was never 'you can’t disagree with pros.' It was that flat-out dismissing the statements of someone like Zhang Jike — without acknowledging the depth of his experience as well as achievements — just reeks of arrogance. The guy knows what he’s talking about. Disagree all you want, but if you’re doing it without comparable insight, perspective as well as achievements, don’t expect to be taken seriously. It lacks basic respect, self-awareness, and just makes you look like another loud keyboard warrior. This is an EJ-heavy community after all 🤣
 
Last edited:
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
🏆 Top 1% Commenter
Well-Known Member
Moderator
Oct 2014
19,973
26,531
70,870
Read 17 reviews
You’re fighting a ghost at this point — literally inventing arguments I never made. They weren't the best examples, I admit, but it went right over your head. For the third time: my point was never 'you can’t disagree with pros.' It was that flat-out dismissing the statements of someone like Zhang Jike — without acknowledging the depth of his experience as well as achievements — just reeks of arrogance. The guy knows what he’s talking about. Disagree all you want, but if you’re doing it without comparable insight, perspective as well as achievements, don’t expect to be taken seriously. It lacks basic respect, self-awareness, and just makes you look like another loud keyboard warrior. This is an EJ-heavy community after all 🤣
Oh, you are so full of it. You mean that everyone here doesn't know who Zhang Jike is? Or you mean the reason why we are discussing his statements is because we don't know who he is? No one who disagreed with hin said that the forehand focused table tennis is not athletic. The points that were brought up were that 1) the backhand oriented style being criticized had beaten all the teammates and lots of high level opponents. 2) the player being criticized for such play-style was 19 years old and that likely explained much more about what happened than his style. 3) just about everyone at the top level plays a balanced game and selects shots according to their ability. Which of these arguments were dismissals of ZJK's experience? Why is it that his more nuanced answer today, while still claiming LSD needs to improve his footwork and forehand, acknowledges all the stuff that was brought up?

I have no illusions about my playing level or knowledge. I am confident enough about it to post it on the internet without any whitewashing. But I have dealt with enough players to know that these things can be discussed insightfully by players of all levels if they understand the limitations of what they are saying. You pretend to but clearly don't. I can point to the new video as a modest validation that you want to pretend you know something without having stated anything materially insightful. There are reasons why keyboard warriors like yourself will post whole threads about finally understanding what it means to get power from the ground without even hitting a single ball. If you spoke with decently good players, you wouldn't be worshipping ERT so much.
 
Last edited:
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
🏆 Top 1% Commenter
Well-Known Member
Feb 2012
2,131
1,548
4,982
Read 1 reviews
Literally no one said that, you are making stuff up 🤣


Your general arguements about our critique do have a point, but you misunderstood arguments, and established presnted results as "arrogance and ego"

You dont have to be zhang jike to understand table tennis, I have many players in my club that I beat them easily, and in many cases during matches (mine or others), their understanding of the game is much much better than mine.

This does not mean I will not listen to their constructive, I repeat, constructive criticism. So when a guy is clearly ignorant about how good saive was, and throws inaccurate information and gets to conclusions all by himself, I cannot respect his opinion and I will make sure he gets his facts straight next time. Call me arrogant, call me egoistic or self centered, but I like to speak/make dialogue with proven facts and numbers, not my personal preferences or what I ASSUME (assuming ! not knowing) is the truth

In order to have a valid/solid opinion, you need to have valid knowledge first.

Lastly , let me ask you a question, you are in zhang jike's marketing team. What do you advise him

1. make 50 videos/tutorials about FH/BH and table tennis tactics

2. make 2-3 videos where you insinuate that some players in the CNT are crap. without blatantly naming anyone, so you can keep the interest/drama going. Even 2-3 members of this forum easily fell right into the trap. You can see them in the two pages of this thread
 
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
🏆 Top 1% Commenter
Well-Known Member
Moderator
Oct 2014
19,973
26,531
70,870
Read 17 reviews
Your general arguements about our critique do have a point, but you misunderstood arguments, and established presnted results as "arrogance and ego"

You dont have to be zhang jike to understand table tennis, I have many players in my club that I beat them easily, and in many cases during matches (mine or others), their understanding of the game is much much better than mine.

This does not mean I will not listen to their constructive, I repeat, constructive criticism. So when a guy is clearly ignorant about how good saive was, and throws inaccurate information and gets to conclusions all by himself, I cannot respect his opinion and I will make sure he gets his facts straight next time. Call me arrogant, call me egoistic or self centered, but I like to speak/make dialogue with proven facts and numbers, not my personal preferences or what I ASSUME (assuming ! not knowing) is the truth

In order to have a valid/solid opinion, you need to have valid knowledge first.

Lastly , let me ask you a question, you are in zhang jike's marketing team. What do you advise him

1. make 50 videos/tutorials about FH/BH and table tennis tactics

2. make 2-3 videos where you insinuate that some players in the CNT are crap. without blatantly naming anyone, so you can keep the interest/drama going. Even 2-3 members of this forum easily fell right into the trap. You can see them in the two pages of this thread
I fall into every "trap", TT is fun.
 
says Passionate about table tennis 🏓
Your general arguements about our critique do have a point, but you misunderstood arguments, and established presnted results as "arrogance and ego"

You dont have to be zhang jike to understand table tennis, I have many players in my club that I beat them easily, and in many cases during matches (mine or others), their understanding of the game is much much better than mine.

This does not mean I will not listen to their constructive, I repeat, constructive criticism. So when a guy is clearly ignorant about how good saive was, and throws inaccurate information and gets to conclusions all by himself, I cannot respect his opinion and I will make sure he gets his facts straight next time. Call me arrogant, call me egoistic or self centered, but I like to speak/make dialogue with proven facts and numbers, not my personal preferences or what I ASSUME (assuming ! not knowing) is the truth

In order to have a valid/solid opinion, you need to have valid knowledge first.

Lastly , let me ask you a question, you are in zhang jike's marketing team. What do you advise him

1. make 50 videos/tutorials about FH/BH and table tennis tactics

2. make 2-3 videos where you insinuate that some players in the CNT are crap. without blatantly naming anyone, so you can keep the interest/drama going. Even 2-3 members of this forum easily fell right into the trap. You can see them in the two pages of this thread
Totally fair points — and thank you for putting it across reasonably without influence of emotion. That’s refreshing, honestly. I agree that valid knowledge and facts should ground discussions. My issue was never with people having differing views or constructive criticism, it was with how some replies came off as dismissive rather than analytical — especially towards someone with the background of Zhang Jike.

I don’t mind disagreement — I mind the tone and lack of acknowledgment of context or experience.

Also, your last point is actually very interesting. I hadn’t really considered it from the media/marketing strategy angle — you might be onto something with that. 😁
 
  • Like
Reactions: Persistence TT
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
Member
Feb 2021
17
8
25
My point is that you are discussing him at different points in his career as if he never evolved. I am just saying that people shouldn't give ZJK's claim some privileged insight. Wang Hao also used his backhand much more often than other players - maybe that is why he lost to Ryu in the Olympics. But more seriously, it is better to just accept that sometimes 19 year olds have lot to learn about table tennis no matter how good they are than to claim that their styles are inherently weak.
It's not like Ryu never beat Ma Lin or Wang Liqin either.The fact remains that his results against Boll/Samsonov were better compared to Ma Long despite playing against them closer in their primes.
In terms of overall shot quality Wang Hao had the best forehand backhand combo.Zhang Jike hit hard but he destroyed his body in no time because he was straining whereas Wang Hao had smooth efficient swing technique rather than trying to hit one inch punches .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Robin0910
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
🏆 Top 1% Commenter
Well-Known Member
Moderator
Oct 2014
19,973
26,531
70,870
Read 17 reviews
It's not like Ryu never beat Ma Lin or Wang Liqin either.The fact remains that his results against Boll/Samsonov were better compared to Ma Long despite playing against them closer in their primes.
In terms of overall shot quality Wang Hao had the best forehand backhand combo.Zhang Jike hit hard but he destroyed his body in no time because he was straining whereas Wang Hao had smooth efficient swing technique rather than trying to hit one inch punches .
Can you cite the statistics you are using to argue that WH had a better head-2-head vs Boll/Samsonov than Ma Long? I'm not disputing Wang Hao's play by the way. I am just arguing that he was more backhand oriented than most players at his time and that he had tremendous success playing that way. Obviously he had a great forehand, but he definitely wasn't a footwork champion who tried to bring the forehand all the time.
 
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
Member
Feb 2021
17
8
25
Can you cite the statistics you are using to argue that WH had a better head-2-head vs Boll/Samsonov than Ma Long? I'm not disputing Wang Hao's play by the way. I am just arguing that he was more backhand oriented than most players at his time and that he had tremendous success playing that way. Obviously he had a great forehand, but he definitely wasn't a footwork champion who tried to bring the forehand all the time.
He lost to Samsonov only once in a small tournament in 2008 in like 17 encounters starting from 2002.Against Boll if we exclude the 2005 World Cup when the Chinese team was jet lagged because they went to Belgium straight after their National Games,he never lost any important match to him.
That was despite having very limited defensive game,he practically never blocked with his backhand or forehand.All of his shots where either loops or counterloops.
As for Ma Long:2009 World Cup vs Samsonov
2010 WTTC Teams vs Boll,2017 World Cup(supposedly his absolute prime still lost to 36 yo Boll).It's not that Boll all of the sudden reached his peak in his mid-30's as some fanboys suggest it's just Ma Long has a relative weakness against left handers.
 
Last edited:
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
🏆 Top 1% Commenter
Well-Known Member
Feb 2012
2,131
1,548
4,982
Read 1 reviews
He lost to Samsonov only once in a small tournament in 2008 in like 17 encounters starting from 2002.Against Boll if we exclude the 2005 World Cup when the Chinese team was jet lagged because they went to Belgium straight after their National Games,he never lost any important match to him.
That was despite having very limited defensive game,he practically never blocked with his backhand or forehand.All of his shots where either loops or counterloops.
As for Ma Long:2009 World Cup vs Samsonov
2010 WTTC Teams vs Boll,2017 World Cup(supposedly his absolute prime still lost to 36 yo Boll).It's not that Boll all of the sudden reached his peak in his mid-30's as some fanboys suggest it's just Ma Long has a relative weakness against left handers.
your stats are spot on.


I dont have any proof about wang hao but there is a video of jaggedtranslates (I think it is probably zhang jike against wang hao in 2013 wttc trials) in which liu guoliang states that wang hao has the best overall record against non chinese players because he was always a "team" player, in a sense that he values team china more than anything. He also explained that he is rather "soft" when facing fellow chinese players, which kinda explains his overall "bad" record against ma lin, and zhang jike
 
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
🏆 Top 1% Commenter
Well-Known Member
Moderator
Oct 2014
19,973
26,531
70,870
Read 17 reviews
He lost to Samsonov only once in a small tournament in 2008 in like 17 encounters starting from 2002.Against Boll if we exclude the 2005 World Cup when the Chinese team was jet lagged because they went to Belgium straight after their National Games,he never lost any important match to him.
That was despite having very limited defensive game,he practically never blocked with his backhand or forehand.All of his shots where either loops or counterloops.
As for Ma Long:2009 World Cup vs Samsonov
2010 WTTC Teams vs Boll,2017 World Cup(supposedly his absolute prime still lost to 36 yo Boll).It's not that Boll all of the sudden reached his peak in his mid-30's as some fanboys suggest it's just Ma Long has a relative weakness against left handers.
Did you ever hear the story that Wang Hao was supposed to play the first match in the 2010 WTTTC final but didn't?

In any case i don't find the distinction in performance you are arguing for statistically significant though you are right that Ma Long did play them more in the later stages of their careers.
 
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
🏆 Top 1% Commenter
Well-Known Member
Sep 2013
13,139
15,419
36,968
Read 3 reviews
And what about Noshad Alamian?
he is a special case, with medical condition
By the way, Kreanga also had a very strong forehand.
yes, but I am saying, that Kreanga is fine doing top spin rallies away from the table with his backhand. most times, majority of players will be only doing forehand away from the table.

any top player needs to have a forehand
LSD and LYJ all have forehand
even HT has a forehand
all 3 of them have footwork
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Egon
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
🏆 Top 1% Commenter
Well-Known Member
Sep 2013
13,139
15,419
36,968
Read 3 reviews
Also, your last point is actually very interesting. I hadn’t really considered it from the media/marketing strategy angle — you might be onto something with that. 😁
post 22 said it, I also said it in post 24 and 56.

if after so many posts, you can't "consider it" to be majority marketing centric, then how many more posts do you need :)

everything ZJK doing is marketing, just like all those other CNT players
they not doing pro bono, there is big money in tiktok

If ZJK really wanted to help LSD, he should rather have a video saying, he spoke to LSD and recommend him to do 1, 2 ,3 etc.

But what is better than stirring up things and making it a hot discussion point on ZJK has a word to say about the world cup.
 
Last edited:
This user has no status.
but he was never even close to become a grand slam champion. There are plenty of top players with strong bh and weak forehand but grand slam champions as ZJK stated? Not really
But he was world number one in a sport dominated by Chinese!
 
This user has no status.
I know and as the original commenter said who I replied to “Saive’s backhand was mediocre which got better overtime” so it wasn’t always weak. Grand Slam champions backhands are not weak in the modern era but we all know that they still preferred the forehand and they relied on it more.
Ma Long, quite obvious.
Saive was always FH-oriented and his BH was only of moderate level, especially in his run-up to the top. That was also the reason why he did not like playing against left-handers but armed himself better against it over the years by improving his BH. His way of playing was therefore very intense and cost him a lot of strength, a bit similar to Hugo but Hugo does have a much better and more powerful BH than what J-M ever had.
 
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
Member
Feb 2021
17
8
25
Saive was always FH-oriented and his BH was only of moderate level, especially in his run-up to the top. That was also the reason why he did not like playing against left-handers but armed himself better against it over the years by improving his BH. His way of playing was therefore very intense and cost him a lot of strength, a bit similar to Hugo but Hugo does have a much better and more powerful BH than what J-M ever had.
The reason he lost to Gatien in 1993 was Gatien's fast serve down the line.They weren't any lefties in the Belgium Team to train against.He was pretty even against him but Gatien had an edge in terms on mentality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Metaxa
This user has no status.
The reason he lost to Gatien in 1993 was Gatien's fast serve down the line.They weren't any lefties in the Belgium Team to train against.He was pretty even against him but Gatien had an edge in terms on mentality.
Indeed, his mental resilience was exceptionally high.
 
Top