Aliexpress Singles Day Sale 2023

[TensorBackhand]

75 inner finally arrived

 

[TensorBackhand]

This arrived too

 

[Fnub]

View attachment 27755
This arrived too

I ordered B2 Prov Blue in black from that store but received in red

 

[TensorBackhand]

Will test Sanwei inner 75 today.

Will compare to Yasaka Atletico Power. They have similar layer thicknesses, so should be good comparison.

 

[riemsesy]

Blade looks nice. Good luck and have fun

 

[TensorBackhand]

So i tested the inner 75, I find that it is a very good blade. My weight is 89 and feels good, the handle feels very good and easy to twist and flick.

I compared this blade to the Yasaka Atletico Power. In theory they should be similar, with the main different being the Koto surface vs Limba. I fit them both with Victas Triple Double on fh and Rhyzen ZGR on bh.

On the FH, I dont find too much difference actually. They both have a good speed. The 75 inner has a higher pitch sound. They both have a some fair dwell time. I think the surface layer isnt affecting the dwell time as much as i thought it would. The overall blade stiffness plays a bigger part. I actually think the 75 inner may have more catchiness.

On the BH, i feel the 75 inner is clearly superior. So much so, that maybe the rubber boosting was not the same and thats what caused difference. But i found the 75 had a faster, snappier feeling. The ball launched longer and higher than the atletico. I felt more confident to loop attack with the 75 inner. Blocks felt stable and responsive.

 

[TT Lover]

So i tested the inner 75, I find that it is a very good blade. My weight is 89 and feels good, the handle feels very good and easy to twist and flick.

I compared this blade to the Yasaka Atletico Power. In theory they should be similar, with the main different being the Koto surface vs Limba. I fit them both with Victas Triple Double on fh and Rhyzen ZGR on bh.

On the FH, I dont find too much difference actually. They both have a good speed. The 75 inner has a higher pitch sound. They both have a some fair dwell time. I think the surface layer isnt affecting the dwell time as much as i thought it would. The overall blade stiffness plays a bigger part. I actually think the 75 inner may have more catchiness.

On the BH, i feel the 75 inner is clearly superior. So much so, that maybe the rubber boosting was not the same and thats what caused difference. But i found the 75 had a faster, snappier feeling. The ball launched longer and higher than the atletico. I felt more confident to loop attack with the 75 inner. Blocks felt stable and responsive.

Which blade has better control and has more flexibility, Atletico Power or 75 Inner.

Thank you sir.
Best regards,

 

[TensorBackhand]

In my opinion: the 75 inner has more control and more flex. It is 0.1mm thinner.

But I only played with it once, so the more I play with it the more I will "get to know" the blade.

 

[TT Lover]

In my opinion: the 75 inner has more control and more flex. It is 0.1mm thinner.

But I only played with it once, so the more I play with it the more I will "get to know" the blade.

Last question, what is your opinion between the Sanwei 75 Inner and DHS H301 : Control > Flexible > Speed (Both blade are Koto top ply + Inner ALC).

Thank you sir.
Best regards,

 

[TensorBackhand]

Last question, what is your opinion between the Sanwei 75 Inner and DHS H301 : Control > Flexible > Speed (Both blade are Koto top ply + Inner ALC).

Thank you sir.
Best regards,

I don't own the H301, so the last time I played with it was 1 or 2 years ago with a friend's racket that had H3 unboosted on it. I'm not sure I could give you a good answer.

But, the last time I tried the H301, It felt very flexy and somewhat slow to me (was it the blade? or the rubber?). So again, it seems like the wood composition actually matters less than the overall blade stiffness.

So the 75 inner seems faster and snappier. The 301 felt slower and flexier. Control is a subjective because it depends what you personally like. For me, I feel the 75 has better control, because it is more responsive. The 301 felt sluggish to me.

 

[riemsesy]

So i tested the inner 75, I find that it is a very good blade. My weight is 89 and feels good, the handle feels very good and easy to twist and flick.

maybe I missed it, but did you have a chance to play with the 75 outer?

 

[TensorBackhand]

maybe I missed it, but did you have a chance to play with the 75 outer?

Yes I did. I wrote about it in the thread. It's a fast blade, with not so much dwell time. But not crazy hard.

 

[turbozed]

In my opinion: the 75 inner has more control and more flex. It is 0.1mm thinner.

But I only played with it once, so the more I play with it the more I will "get to know" the blade.

How would you compare the Stuor Harimoto ZLC vs the Sanwei 75 Inner in terms of speed, hold, and flex?

I'm going to be testing one of the two compared to my Fextra using same rubbers (LAC and Moon 12 Blue) but wondering which to try first. I'd prefer to start with the one with more dwell and flex.

 

[TensorBackhand]

How would you compare the Stuor Harimoto ZLC vs the Sanwei 75 Inner in terms of speed, hold, and flex?

I'm going to be testing one of the two compared to my Fextra using same rubbers (LAC and Moon 12 Blue) but wondering which to try first. I'd prefer to start with the one with more dwell and flex.

I haven't compared them directly against each other yet. But Maybe I should do that today.

My impression is that they have equal flex, 75 inner has slightly more speed, and Stuor has slightly more hold or softer hold because of the limba.

I think you should start with the Stuor

 

[turbozed]

I haven't compared them directly against each other yet. But Maybe I should do that today.

My impression is that they have equal flex, 75 inner has slightly more speed, and Stuor has slightly more hold or softer hold because of the limba.

I think you should start with the Stuor

I was thinking the same but figured you'd be the right guy to ask. Thanks a lot!

 

[TensorBackhand]

I was thinking the same but figured you'd be the right guy to ask. Thanks a lot!

So i tested the stuor and 75 inner more today. I like both of them a lot and 75 might be challenging for my favorite blade.

I feel 75 inner is better on bh, its more responsibe and blocks are very comfortable and bouncy.

Stuor harimoto is still probably more catchy.

Im using relatively slow and hard rubber, so i feel that favors the 75 inner more. Maybe a faster rubber would suit the stuor more.

 

[TareqPhoto]

So i tested the stuor and 75 inner more today. I like both of them a lot and 75 might be challenging for my favorite blade.

I feel 75 inner is better on bh, its more responsibe and blocks are very comfortable and bouncy.

Stuor harimoto is still probably more catchy.

Im using relatively slow and hard rubber, so i feel that favors the 75 inner more. Maybe a faster rubber would suit the stuor more.

You told me that you like Stuor Harimoto more than Stuor Long 5, so i bought Harimoto, now how about Stuor Long 5 vs. Sanwei 75???

 

[TareqPhoto]

Also, which rubbers do you play on Harimoto and which are on 75?

 

[TensorBackhand]

You told me that you like Stuor Harimoto more than Stuor Long 5, so i bought Harimoto, now how about Stuor Long 5 vs. Sanwei 75???

Harimoto and 75 inner are much better than Stuor Long 5. Long 5 was a bit too muchy and slow, unresponsive

 

[TensorBackhand]

Also, which rubbers do you play on Harimoto and which are on 75?

Same rubbers, victas triple double on fh and joola rhyzen zgr on bh boosted.