Search results

That's not my experience, at the contrary; I'm explaining that my H3 was too fast. And I had no more effort to do for looping that any other rubber, thanks to the booster. I just want to adapt this regular H3 to have a better short game. I've been recommended the 39° that is slower, way slower...

Coucou petit Français !

I tested yesterday a H3 Nat (not Neo) BS 40°. I boosted it 2x with JieChi. I loved playing with it for everything that was taking initiative. But one thing was really bad : the short play. The rubber was so fast that I could not make any short return, whereas it's one of my greatest strength...

I never used H3N in the FH, so I can't answer. My H3N is on the BH, and I use LAC on the FH. I used old H3 on the FH, and both are comparable in terms of spin, but I can't answer precisely because I'm not a robot gifted with HD camera and AI spin analysis tool. I should try Spinsight some day to...

Topsheet of Arthur C is way less tacky than normal LAC. I don't want to jump to conclusion with so few minutes of play, but it looks different from LAC.

By the way, I asked the question on an old topic, but might have a quicker answer here. My H3 Prov (not Neo) BS 40°, 2x boosted with JieChi, has proven to be too fast for short play on this blade. What should I choose ? H3 Prov 40°, boosted once H3 Prov 41°, boosted once H3 Neo Prov 40°...

The poor short game comes from the too fast boosted H3. I hope the defect is only on mine, that would be a strange feature 😁 I am bad at BH flicks. I tried some but really, no conclusion can be made because I usually don't flick. That's a domain I'd like to work on during a private session I...

I tested the blade yesterday with a very fast boost H3 BS. Looping, countering, blocking were insane. I loved it. Short play was very poor though. One thing I'm disappointed about is that the handle has a defect, it's not symmetrical and I got bothered at the beginning. The handle is less...

I tested the LAC Arthur C yesterday. Not very pleased with it, very slow and it's way less tacky than the normal version. It was a short test, I'll test more in a few weeks. I tested again the LAC BS, and it was way better than the last try. I was testing a H3 Nat BS at the same time, and both...

Cheapest is often AOne Store, but seems to have provided bad batch of LAC.

LAC on FH of course. For the head heaviness, I'll know more when I have glued the rubbers tonight.

Not glued yet. I'll tell tonight.

Yes, that's it. It's as soft as my Nexxus EL 38º. It will be a good BH rubber I hope.

I received mine. 89.8gr and 1371Hz. I'll test it with 2 setups : - H3 Nat BS 40º mega boosted + H3 Neo OS 37º méga boosted too - Arthur China + Gewo Superselect to compare to my usual setup

Kunlun Sponge 3, A40, but measured at 40º ESN.

The most reactive Loki rubber is Arthur China, there's no debate. It's the only one that has that 'clic' when you hit the ball even unboosted.

Sales on Contra.de, I ordered a Inventus 47,5º and a SS 45º for 45€ each. The latter is my BH rubber since the beginning of the season. I prefer it to the SS 48º because of the feeling I have with it. Since Inventus seems softer than SS, I think it's worth the try.

Loki uses different shapes for its blades. Rxton blades have different handles than w81, and Loki K1 K2 K3 have different handles too, thinner. Rxton handle is squarish. w81 is "normal".

I think that LAC gets its qualities a lot from the sponge. So I'm pretty sure that this LAC-C won't be as good. But I might be wrong.

I think they are cloning Hurricane 9, so a different sponge, maybe 36° like the new Arthur Europe 45 or 37° like H9 Purple. I bought the purple one out of curiosity. About LAC Blue Sponge 39° : I boosted it with 2 layers of JieChi. It's still pretty unplayable. There is no linearity at all. Or...