Search results

I think MX-P is bouncier than t05. A very good rubber, and because of its comparatively low price used by many who wouldn´t want to support BTYs price policy. For 05fx, FX-D is an option, but I thought FX-S is even closer.

In general, not at all. But the overall "recipe" of the R48 is spinnier and less bouncy than that of MX-P.

They really get things right with their "versions" of popular BTY blades. And even the cheap blades are not too bad. The manufacturing quality is not up to par, but they play ok and for unter 10 USD you shouldn´t complain ;-)

I agree. The question is whether you want or need that much catapult. R48 is by no means dull, and feels more stable to me than MX-P. The topsheet is of a better quality and the ULTRAMAX concept with thinner topsheet and thicker sponge enables better spin creation. But everybody has their own...

Gauzy HL CO is a very fine blade, not as fast as the Treiber blades, but also with good feedback and precision.

Well, what is control then? For example, my VCO blade gives me excellent feedback and I can play every shot with confidence. In relation to the speed/power of this blade that for me is perfect control. I would most probably struggle to play equally confident with a slow 5-ply all wood, so that...

Absolutely.

Because the myths around pro version rubbers persist and the hype won´t end. Surely they ´ll find someone to take it off them for that price, then "feel" how much better it is.

No. He is playing with Infinity MX-P, hence my question above.

Not Infinity MX-P as usual? ;-)

Rubber repackaged for marketing purposes. If a Chinese manufacturer provides something to the Chinese team you might call that a national version. If a German manufacturer does NOT provide something to the German team because they are sponsored by Butterfly what national version would that be?

Exactly my thinking, but there are people waiting for a miracle, And when they finally get a hold on Glayzer, they might even think it happened just because they wanted it so much to ;-)

Wouldn´t be surprised. All those poor people hoping for "identical topsheet with softer sponge", as if BTY or any other manufacturer would do such thing ;-)

Not yet available here. But what I read also seems to indicate a more grippy tensor than a more speedy Chinese rubber.

The purpose of the contract is to supply players with material that makes them successful, so you can advertise with them. If the material isn´t good enough, players might demand their contract to be expanded to allow them to play other/better stuff - this was the case for a long time with...

A few short points. - There are "pro" versions of some rubbers that are not available commercially, but even not every sponsored player gets them - Mostly the difference lies in the selection/quality control. - Often the difference lies only in the sponge hardness. - Some pros even play rubbers...

That is probably one of the great advantages of C-Rasanter over ANY other Hybrid rubber I know. Everything that came before felt still typically "Chinese" to me, despite the Tensor sponges underneath. You would have to adjust in order to have the advantages, with all the disadvantages too...

Bluegrip S1 puts a sticky topsheet on top on an old sponge (Acuda S1). C48 has a newly developed topsheet on a still relatively new sponge (Energy Cell). Of course both are of the "Hybrid" type hat has been trending for a while now, really taking flight from d09c onwards. But to me the S1 and...

Yes, similar concept I´d say.

EL stands for elastic and indicates an emphasis on spin. What XT stands for I am not sure but it indicates an emphasis on velocity.