Don't like it? Scroll on and let those enjoy who do. Live and let live.
Thanks!
[Emoji9]
Agree.
Alright. Thanks for waking this thread up. I have some thoughts.
I do think it would be worth the TT women being allowed to show their more feminine and sexy side on the court when or if they wanted to. I really am not sure why, in TT the women are generally dressed the way they are on the court.
Tennis shows us that women athletes can be both women and athletes:
And then there are other sports that really allow us to observe how an athletic woman can be sexy too:
Given that I teach yoga and about 95% of my clients are women and I see an average of 300 people a week if i combine group and private clients, I see a lot of women. And a lot of the women I see are really quite attractive. And they are also dressed in outfits that add to that. So, from a certain perspective, I could say that there is a scarcity of attractive women in table tennis.
However, I think that is far more the fashion sense in the sport rather than the women in the sport.
I have seen Ariel Hsing play many times. I never thought she was anything special. She happens to be a friend of Michael Landers' and I am friends with Michael. One time Ariel was in NYC and she was with Michael and they were dressed to go out and do something social together rather than dressed for training. And I must confess, my jaw did drop! She was unbelievably hot. Much hotter than one might think from match footage.
And I confess. I am not entirely sure that we are better off with women in table tennis having attire that shows off how good they look while they play. Or if we are better off with them dressing how they do for matches.
One thing is for sure, they do look like they are all business and want to be seen as athletes first.
But I guess, in the end, I do wish there was more space for them to dress more like women while playing if they wanted to. Rather than seeing them all looking like androgynous figures in boyish outfits.
Sorry if I took this old thread in a slightly different direction.
Sent from The Subterranean Workshop by Telepathy
Well, I don't think equating free expression of female identity with a norm for showing skin, provocative dress helps things. Avoiding the word "toxic" here...
Note that the thread isn't calling for elegantly or stylishly dressed persons, or people of graceful composure; it's calling for "sexiest female", which in my book is in direct line with the way of judging women first and foremost as objects of desire.
Now some of my best friends know women; and I think it is shallow and offputting to put that thing centerstage when discussing female athletes. I admire Petrissa Solja because she is an outstanding table tennis player. She also has a female body. So do the other female athletes. Or non-athletes. And there's beauty in some form or other in many bodies. Yet when discussing an athlete, the thing that sets them apart isn't their gracious bodily curves. It's their athletic prowess.
So to me this way of filing this class of athletes away is harmfully irrelevant. Yes, one can look good when playing table tennis. That has nothing to do with being androgynous, or dressing female -- or "the sexiest".
PC? Not really. Showing a marginal amount of respect, earned in years of hard work by professional athletes giving it their all? Yes. That's what we owe them, at least. Rather than to start drooling about which player-that-happens-to-have-boobs is the sexiest of the bunch.
Looking feminine is a different thing from being sexy. I'm leaving it there. See you tomorrow. [emoji41]
See i don't think this has anything to do with sexual orientation, personally they can do whatever they're up to, but i think if there we're more female looking outfits for female players, they would probably be chosen and not be looking so masculine.
Well, I don't think equating free expression of female identity with a norm for showing skin, provocative dress helps things. Avoiding the word "toxic" here...
Note that the thread isn't calling for elegantly or stylishly dressed persons, or people of graceful composure; it's calling for "sexiest female", which in my book is in direct line with the way of judging women first and foremost as objects of desire.
Now some of my best friends know women; and I think it is shallow and offputting to put that thing centerstage when discussing female athletes. I admire Petrissa Solja because she is an outstanding table tennis player. She also has a female body. So do the other female athletes. Or non-athletes. And there's beauty in some form or other in many bodies. Yet when discussing an athlete, the thing that sets them apart isn't their gracious bodily curves. It's their athletic prowess.
So to me this way of filing this class of athletes away is harmfully irrelevant. Yes, one can look good when playing table tennis. That has nothing to do with being androgynous, or dressing female -- or "the sexiest".
PC? Not really. Showing a marginal amount of respect, earned in years of hard work by professional athletes giving it their all? Yes. That's what we owe them, at least. Rather than to start drooling about which player-that-happens-to-have-boobs is the sexiest of the bunch.