There are no advantages to being Asian in the US. Asians work hard like shit and have the lowest crime rates but are not getting anywhere except becoming worker bees. Asians in the US constantly pay an invisible Asian tax, right from racial bullying at schools to official racist quotas at university enrolment (maybe it's now becoming unofficial after the Harvard case) to bamboo ceilings at the workplace, having 0 to negative representation in media, getting villified constantly in the news and still being the target of hate crimes and police brutality, and a whole lot other issues I haven't named.
There's literally nothing positive about having to work a shit ton harder than other races and still getting treated like shit.
I will make a lot of comments that support some of the stuff you are saying here, especially at the end. (after I qualify some things)
The formula all people, groups, and nations have used to gain economic and social success in USA is SKILLS, HARD WORK, and SAVINGS.
Skills are marketable skills that once training/accreditation is done will result in immediate employment at a higher and increasing level. In USA, so many go a uni thinking one can only move up with a degree, it is mostly untrue in USA, mostly because of the choice.
If one majors in English Lit, or African studies, one is not very likely to get much employment opportunities, even if somehow someone gets a job with that, it is dead end stuff.
If one majors in immediately marketable stuff like medicine, science, elec/mech/computer/software engineering, then there is immediate opportunity after uni, it only goes up with time.
Hard Work is needed. if one works harder than the rest of the people in their workplace and/or those in his/her field, more success comes.
Savings is a required thing. One will not grow financially if they spend 100-160% of their income. Even better to know even simple investing like S&P 500 mutual fund, which can be opened with low hundreds of USD a month investing (though one really needs 500-1000 a month investing at 10% growth to really grow their investment after 30-40 years)
For the longest time, in USA, this was exactly how every person and group got successful. When people and groups began to depend on government for handouts (which mandated a single parent led house - almost always a female) we began decades of ever increasing fatherless homes... when kids grow up without discipline, love, accountability and parental vision, the chances kid succeeds goes way down... and chances kid becomes a violent criminal go way up. Well over 1/2 our violent crimes are committed by the fatherless.
In USA, for many decades, you had low single digit percentage of Asian descended people being born in USA fatherless... and we know the traditional values (USA used to have them too before the welfare state)... we know the outcomes.
One can look at in USA at all the uni programs of these advanced studies that result in good paying jobs... nearly ALL these programs are dominated by Asians - Japanese, Chinese, Korean, Philippina, INDIAN. You might be lucky to see 10-25% of non-Asian USA people in these programs. WHY would it be like this for Asians? They have PARENTS who push their kids, have a vision for them with strong love, sacrifice, discipline and accountability strongly enforced.
Look at who blows away all their money when they get work and who saves... the ones saving are those with strong parental leadership and support - Asians strongly represented here.
It is that simple. The rest of USA have the same opportunity to work hard and get their kids ready to succeed... but if 70% plus of one group, 50%+ of another, 30%+ of another group... the 3 largest groups including whites be born without father and mother from birth... what you think gunna happen. You think no father household gunna make kid actually work, study and achieve? What you think those SAT scores gunna look like? There are entire school districts in USA where zero percent of the kids can read or do math at grade level... it is because no one at home pushing them.
Then in USA, academia has been taken over by marxists... they set the rules for uni admission. They believe it is not "Fair" to admit the highest SAT score and otherwise best qualified candidates into uni... so they quota-in their made up number other groups who would not qualify on merit.
This is direct blatant discrimination vs those who have the best qualifications... which no-shyt Sherlock they worked the hardest to get that qualified. These are often great majority Asians who are denied such opportunity at the "best" unis, although they are much better qualified.
This gets worse as the under-qualified who got admitted, although with an SAT in 80th percentile, who would be on Dean's list at Nebraska U, now are on academic suspension at MIT, because they cannot keep up with the coursework... they bomb out and now have 50,000 to 100,00 USD debt and credentials. (Boston is uber expensive, costs $30k a yr min to live in a hole in the wall - so double this for Boston are unis).
blahness is right about the forced disadvantages for Asians in the USA unis... and the bullying... but is bad in other groups too, often worse. A black in one of these schools where next to no one achieves... if that kid studies hard and tries to earn his way out of poverty though strong devotion to study... that kid is big time bullied by his peers and called a sellout to his race.
blahness correctly states Asians in USA commit way less crime relative to other groups... it is directly related to fatherlessness in larger numbers. Some people are evil and will oppress others and do crime, but the fatherless are literally 10x more likely to be in this category, especially the violent crimes.
The Harvard Admissions Scandal is typical of many elite Unis run by marxists. Such marxists will say that student population should reflect the population demographics in percentages... and damn admitting on merit. Even though Asian descended ones are around 7% of USA people, they dominate the top tier 1-2 percent of SAT scores, which has traditionally been a strong consideration for academic qualification.
Now a lot of these elite unis do not want to use SAT to justify their discrimination.
