Help me understand the massive diversity in price range of all wood 5 ply blafes

says 2023 Certified Organ Donor
says 2023 Certified Organ Donor
🏆 Top 1% Commenter
Well-Known Member
Sep 2011
13,493
14,299
32,463
Read 27 reviews
100USD for a quality wood blade is not very over-priced given today's market.

Myself, I use a $30 to $40 USD blade just fine and destroy many victims using it...

... but this is a free market and suckers can (and will) pay what they want... and they get what they want dammit hell or high water.
 
says 2023 Certified Organ Donor
says 2023 Certified Organ Donor
🏆 Top 1% Commenter
Well-Known Member
Sep 2011
13,493
14,299
32,463
Read 27 reviews
If any Socialist, price control luvin fool player wants price controled TT equipment, they are cordially invited to change their residence to Cuba or Venezuela.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.
 
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
Member
Oct 2024
261
279
797
If any Socialist, price control luvin fool player wants price controled TT equipment, they are cordially invited to change their residence to Cuba or Venezuela.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Maybe the forthcoming city-run groceries in a certain east coast US city will have price-controlled W968 blades.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: PoppaChubby
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
Member
Mar 2022
420
677
2,038
Re: OP -- Really great question, thanks for asking it.

You've already heard most of the reasons for the price difference from other posters -- I e.: wood quality, glue use, brand equity & positioning, intended target market, and country of manufacture. All these factors directly go into the final RRP of a blade.

To that list you can also add the following factors (amongst many others):

MATERIAL COST FLUCTUATIONS:
Wood can (and usually does) vary in cost a lot over time, depending on supply and demand. Sometimes you can accommodate cost variations through to species substitution (eg: Spruce and Douglas fir are virtually completely interchangeable in a blade in terms of performance and playing feel, but Spruce however is much rarer nowadays, and is much more expensive). Other times however, if it's a genuinely irreplaceable wood for the design of the blade, then a manufacturer has no option but to charge more whenever the prices goes up (...and up, and UP! 🙄). Granted this is not such a big deal with cheap control centric beginner blades, but the principle still applies).

CHANGING FIXED COSTS:
Running my blade-making business has been an absolute bastard these last few months, due to our landlord being a shit over our rent and operating conditions. It's made things particularly problematic for us on a number of fronts. We're not free to raise our prices at six or seven times the cost of inflation at the drop if a hat (even if the rent we're expected to pay does go up that much, that quickly 🙄🙄🙄😡😡😡). It plays merry hell with every part of our operations frankly and we're fighting hard to avoid that spilling over into the final purchase price. But if rents keep increasing locally the way they have been of late, sooner or later that dam is going to burst.

MANUFACTURING METHODS & BLADE DESIGN TRENDS

There's lots of different ways to add control to a blade, just as there's a lot of different ways to *define* control (I mean what does 'high control' really mean objectively anyway, right?)

All the blades you mention have good control, but they also achieve that control a number of different ways, with a number of different trade-offs occuring along the way.

For example, some woods like basswood actively absorb impact forces (compared to something like Hinoki, which both reflects it and adds its own elastic potential as well). If you add a thick layer of basswood to your blade, then bang! -- you get an instant jump in control. Problem is, it also kills the top speed and playing feel at the same time. A lot of very cheap beginner blades use nothing but basswood for the control it gives, but they will also feel like complete crap to a more experienced player, so that approach to adding control doesn't work so well in every case. Basswood is also pretty cheap to buy, as it's really not used for much due to its softness and lack of overall strength, so for a cheaper-end blade, adding at least some basswood into the mix is often the go-to method for adding control.

You can also get good control by changing the overall makeup of your core and medial layers, by lowering the average density of the woods you use in these layers. Once again this will slow the blade down, just not as much as adding a shock absorber like basswood. Trade off being, you often also lose top end speed that way. With a beginner blade it's not a big deal, but again, an advanced player would find it annoying. You also risk having bad layering this way, and your blade can start to develop a bit of a hollow playing feeling to it (which like I said, can be very annoying in the hands of a better player).

There's other, better ways than these to add extra control, such as softening the outer layer a bit, as this adds both control and dwell without impacting top speed as much, but the flip side of that being it can also affects the rubber choices that feel best with that blade. Harder sponge rubbers are all the rage nowadays, and they tend to prefer having a harder base underneath them (which is partially why you're seeing a lot more koto and hard composite fabrics used in a blade's outer layers nowadays, and slightly less all-wood / limba outers / inner carbon blades). Problem being, even Limba and koto are getting more expensive nowadays, so you're back to balancing your material costs again. (This is not such a problem for us, as we don't use either of these woods very much at all, but again -- it illustrates the principle).

CHANGES TO SHIPPING / DISTRIBUTION COSTS / RETAIL MARGINS / TAXATION ETC...

Things like the above also impact the final blade price obviously, but they haven't been mentioned yet, so I thought I'd raise them. You'd be staggered how much a single container ship grounded across a canal can affect your costs (erratic, deluded, tariffs obsessed national leaders being in power don't really help much either... not that I'm pointing fingers at anybody, as there's more than one of those in the world too😂😂)

Apologies for the length of this post, but your question is so rarely raised, (and is so pertinent), I thought I'd address it in a little more detail, and from a blade maker's perspective.

Hope this helps. 🙂
 
Last edited:
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
🏆 Top 1% Commenter
Well-Known Member
Mar 2023
1,090
1,059
7,515
Again, Butterfly prices are a lot more reasonable in Japan. In fact, they are largely in line with other brands/manufacturers there...
I think their high prices abroad have much more to do with their chosen distribution model than with the factors you mentioned.
They may not factor in the costs of marketing and player sponsorship for products within Japan, but for global prices these costs are taken into account.
Anyway without having prime cost data, which also includes expenses on advertising, marketing, player sponsorship and distribution, it is very difficult to judge whether the price corresponds to the quality of the product.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Wakkibatty
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
Member
Jul 2025
65
95
158
Firstly, I want to say that Petr Korbel is NOT near 100$, at least in Hong Kong where I bought it. It was around 60$.

In my opinion, the main difference between these blades is just wood quality. And of course, the name on it makes it more expensive. I would recommend the Petr Korbel the most if you have enough money, since it can be used all the way up to a high level.

Petr Korbel costs around 39-44 Euros here in Germany. If you dont Take the JP version.
 
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
Active Member
Oct 2024
626
407
1,561
If any Socialist, price control luvin fool player wants price controled TT equipment, they are cordially invited to change their residence to Cuba or Venezuela.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Or France... where Butterfly does not exist that much. But yeah french players are bad, really bad... right ?

From departemental to regional leagues, most of the guys use Tibhar blades since decades now, then Stiga and Donic comes right after. In the 90's a french company was making awesome blades and rubbers at a ridiculous price point when chinese stuff were not that easy to find. Banco made probably the very first hybrid rubber with the China Spin, as Tibhar with the Dang!, I knew a guy who was speed glueing his Dang! rubbers both sides, it was insanely good !
This company is still making blades, and none of them is heavier than 80g, the ALL+ Magic Light weights only 65g for 40€.

Stiga and Donic ALL+ blades are really afordable too, I've used all of those 3 brands and never paid more than 60 € for any blade.

Also, I don't know any FFTT's affiliated club that charges more than 300€... a year ! for any player, and you can train there at least for 4 to 5 hours a week. I think most of us are cubans or Venzuelians, who knows ! tell me where US table tennis is now with that free market and things like Pingpod ?
 
Last edited:
Top