This user has no status.
Member
In the catalouge I have from Contra (a German table tennis shop) the Airoc S has actually been given higher rating on speed than Airoc M. o_o
Thanks for again a great review.
It seems that this rubber is very reactive to incoming spin or it lacks control. I noticed more errors made by both of you compared to previous reviews.
Is the hardness of the topsheet comparable to for example BF M1 or M2?
Awesome review by TTD and yogi_bear! One request to you guys is also to explain that what kind of blades are best suited for the rubbers you review.
Sent from my Nokia Lumia 925 using Tapatalk
As the rubber is designed with poly ball in mind and there is no mention of ball used in the review so I guess it is still old celluloid. Results may be different using the new ball.
I have it as RPB on Intensity carbon. Somehow I found it having a higher throw than JP01 Turbo on FH, which suits the lower bounce new ball pretty well. Could it be that the blade + rubber combination cause the medium low throw in the review?
And great shot at 6:33 Dan, Wow!
Is the serve goes spinny with this rubber?
Have you guys used the poly ball in the reveiws since the poly ball review or are you still using the celluliod ball on these reviews?
Any chance you guys could see how this rubber plays with the new poly ball seamed? Just curious if this is a "new" generation rubber for poly ball or if it's still designed for the celluloid?
Good Review Dan, did you use to poly ball ?
Hey @NDragon,
Around 1 week We reviewed the rubber today, we found it very good!
The rubber looks inconsistent to me
Couldn't give a brief comparison with the M quick could ya?
Awesome review by TTD and yogi_bear! One request to you guys is also to explain that what kind of blades are best suited for the rubbers you review.
Sent from my Nokia Lumia 925 using Tapatalk