Some good advice guys, thanks.
Are you guys able to block smashes by just standing at the edge of the table? I find that when I hit a high ball, I start backing up immediately because I know I won't have time to react if I'm up close to the table.
I don't quite follow. First you ask about blocking a smash close to the table (so playing defense against a smash) and then talk about backing up after you smash (when you're on the offensive which I don't get. If you're on the attack and they're defensively just trying to stay alive yeah you should stay at the table and continue to smash).
Back to playing D and talking reaction time:
I'm actually starting to wonder if you think your reactions are slow when maybe it's possible they're fine. You're just not moving back when your opponent is about to smash a high ball on you and you're left wondering why you can't block that ball back.
While one might get a nice reactive block vs a smash close to the table the goes back quickly for a winner from time to time, I think this is more the exception rather than the rule. I think if you get in the habit of trying this too often, you'll find you generally lose that point 80% of the time.
I think when you see the opponent loading up for a big smash you should be backing up. I'd go as far as to say it's bad strategy to stand there up at the table stubbornly as if you don't know what's coming. What's wrong with giving yourself a fraction more of time? Just a few steps back can seem like a world of difference sometimes. At least for me it can.
You see pros when they get into trouble and the point is going against them start to back up. Maybe start lobbing staying in the point. Looking for an opportunity to loop back if given the opportunity. But their focus is to stay alive in the point. Maybe the opponent will miss. Maybe if they fish enough, they'll get an opportunity to give a big loop right back and get in the point.