This user has no status.
Hey everybody,
I come today with a (possibly) controversial topic after having tried 3 sheets of Dignics 09c (1.9 and 2.1) for about a year on 3 different blades (Nittaku Violin, DHS PG7 and DHS Wang Chuqin). My testing was done approx 80% of the time on BH and 20% on FH, as for my forehand I much prefer the Hurricane 3 Neo (but I tried nevertheless!).
My conclusion after the testing period is: I think that most amateur players (USATT <1800 or TTR <1450 approx) should avoid it because they will not be able to activate the sponge constantly during a rally and thus not get the benefits the rubber offers for the price that it costs. It can also lead to bad technical habits (racket angle too closed, too much brushing) and unforced errors while adjusting to the high throw angle and rubber overall. Plus it's not as easy to use in the passive game that most amateurs find themselves often into (myself included of course).
I have put all my in-depth findings here and also some of the alternatives to it (there are too many, not all are in there). There is also links to other communities and forums (like this one) for crediting those authors and having different views on the matter.
Blogpost link: https://www.tabletennisequipmenthelp.com/blog/dignics-09c-review-amateurs
I hope you will enjoy the read and always please give your feedback and opinion, diversity of opinions is important! This is not the truth, it's just my truth
Thanks,
Victor
I come today with a (possibly) controversial topic after having tried 3 sheets of Dignics 09c (1.9 and 2.1) for about a year on 3 different blades (Nittaku Violin, DHS PG7 and DHS Wang Chuqin). My testing was done approx 80% of the time on BH and 20% on FH, as for my forehand I much prefer the Hurricane 3 Neo (but I tried nevertheless!).
My conclusion after the testing period is: I think that most amateur players (USATT <1800 or TTR <1450 approx) should avoid it because they will not be able to activate the sponge constantly during a rally and thus not get the benefits the rubber offers for the price that it costs. It can also lead to bad technical habits (racket angle too closed, too much brushing) and unforced errors while adjusting to the high throw angle and rubber overall. Plus it's not as easy to use in the passive game that most amateurs find themselves often into (myself included of course).
I have put all my in-depth findings here and also some of the alternatives to it (there are too many, not all are in there). There is also links to other communities and forums (like this one) for crediting those authors and having different views on the matter.
Blogpost link: https://www.tabletennisequipmenthelp.com/blog/dignics-09c-review-amateurs
I hope you will enjoy the read and always please give your feedback and opinion, diversity of opinions is important! This is not the truth, it's just my truth
Thanks,
Victor
Last edited: