This user has no status.
This user has no status.
🏆 Top 1% Commenter
Well-Known Member
Well-Known Member
Actually, I think the video shows that she does toss it at least 6 inches, and you can see this if you go frame by frame (use the period button to go forward and comma button to go backwards). Six inches is not much ... It's about the height of the net. You can drop your hand as long as the ball doesn't go below the table.This is a great point. Good example of this is Ding Ning's tomahawk serve. In real time it looks like she tosses the ball well over the 16cm minimum. In slow motion, she's actually just tossing it sideways and dropping her hand. There's almost no vertical travel from her palm whatsoever. Here's a good video with slow mo that analyzes it:
It's incredibly hard to discern this in real time, creates an optical illusion that fools everyone not watching closely, and is definitely illegal. So the ref that faults this serve requires not only great observational skills, but also a lot of bravery since she got raked over the coals harshly by everyone with calls for her to be fired and shamed.
This is something that VAR would probably easily spot, and whatever technology that shows the path of the ball with a graphic would make these sorts of fault uncontroversial since viewers would immediately understand the problem.
It'll probably never happen so instead we get an arms race where players devise clever ways of making illegal serves look very legal, then get upset when it's called. I suppose toss height violations do mess with the timing of the receiver somewhat. But I'm not sure if the advantage given to the server is significant at all in comparison to outright hidden serves. So I also think it's a worrying trend that there have been more faults due to toss height and angle lately instead of hiddenness.