This is way more comfortable in the hand compared to the regular version. Been using it with T80 (FH) and T05 (BH) side by side with an Acoustic ST L-Size with the same rubbers (both blades are 88-89g). The feel is amazing. Blocks against topspin are super easy but come out a little slower. Looping is fun due to the flex and drives have a direct, controlled feel. When opening up, I feel like I can adjust the angle a little more forward as the flex accommodates this.
I think I get the contrast between the Violin and the Acoustic now. Violin is harder but more flexible while the Acoustic is softer but stiffer. After a few sessions, I can play with both blades interchangeably using the same rubbers. Right now I'm leaning towards the Violin for greater consistency. It just makes me feel a little bit more confident with my shots. The Acoustic remains a lovely blade and I would never part with mine - I use it when I feel like playing more aggressively.
One thing I'm curious about is why Nittaku chose to make the head size smaller at 149x156mm. Maybe making it 150x157mm would make the blade too flexible?
View attachment 16295View attachment 16293View attachment 16294View attachment 16292View attachment 16296View attachment 16297
By the way, this EJ bug has gone into overdrive. I now also have a Tenor ST and an Acoustic Carbon Inner ST L-Size. I think I've reached the point of no return and have to get the Acoustic Carbon, Violin Carbon and Violoncello to complete the entire String Instruments line. Perhaps I'll turn this thread into a comprehensive comparison of the entire line