I think you're right, and at the same time I think it contradicts your points about continents that have more growth potential. To you, India, Australia, the US, are the territories where there are more opportunities for the table tennis "market" to grow. If you really want them to grow, you have to "artificially" encourage them to be a part of that circus, so you have to give them the same amount of points. We all know Aditya Sareen is a joke, he's been pushed up by the medias, but he's not worth his ranking. Hwan Bae is the only aussie to me to be a legitimate top 50.
Now India. It's weird. Manav Thakkar plays in the Pro A, with the Bros, in now (since last june) the best club. But He rarely plays, and his win/loss ratio is ... not that good, most of the time Antoine Sureau will prefer Antoine Hachard, who's definitely not have that international caliber. He's better that's for sure on the international level.
Probably because the Pro A is becoming better? more density so it's better for experienced guys like Hachard instead of newcomers like Thakkar ? he'll have to adjust to the situation.
The US, well... they're trapped by their own vision of capitalism, as long as they won't consider TT like they consider track and field, swimming, american football or basket ball at the college level, or even earlier at the AAU level, TT has no chance to grow there. Nada, niet, que dalle.