This user has no status.
This user has no status.
I think Joola didn't make new blade but just change color. Zhou Qihao 45 and 90 are Freeze and Freeze Hrd.
Have you tried Hrd version?
Based on the picture, both are same speed, Hrd more control, less Accuracy
I own a Joola HRD and for me, its better than the viscaria. Paired it with dignics05 and tenergy 19![]()
But have you tried Joola Zhou Qihao 90? Do you have your own one?
Viscaria and Super alc Viscaria are not interesting for me.
tomahawk11;385856i said:Several people mentioned the blade not being head-heavy.
I had to get rid of a blade because the balance of the blade was too low for me.
Could someone measure the balance point, similar to how Hipnotic/SDC does it?
I've done it by placing the blade on the edge of a table, and then gradually pulling the handle closer to me, so less of the racket is on the table, until it can no longer balance on the edge any more - and then measure from the start of the handle to this point.
My current racket has this point at 3.5cm (without rubbers) and i really like the feeling of this balance.
I have been using the Freeze for one year, I've recently tried the ZQH 45 and the latter is definitely faster and with different ball feel... [emoji971]
What rubbers are you using?
Sent from my using Tapatalk
Which blade? Current? Freeze? ZQH 45?
Which blade? Current? Freeze? ZQH 45?
But have you tried Joola Zhou Qihao 90? Do you have your own one?
Viscaria and Super alc Viscaria are not interesting for me.
would anyone please comment how Joola Vyzaryz Trinity blade (the most expensive Joola blade) would compare to mentioned blades
Last Friday I shortly introduced the ZQH 90 into my training. Basically, I stay with my current blade for the whole training and I make some drills/schemes also with ZQH so to compare. I've also made some games with ZQH at the end of the training. I'm doing this cause I've the last half season match yet to play and I don't want to change setup in between.
ZQH perfomed very well. On FH I have more power and spin and definitely good control. The only thing that I concern is that the trajectory of the ball is longer than my current setup so I'd need for sure some time to adapt.
On BH this blade is outstanding, I can punch drive with ease and produce a laser like bh drive. I can easily see short pips player using it. As for inverted, the combination of spin and speed of my bh openeer is very high, it was difficult for my opponent to block it. Very good backspin push also. The ratio quality of the ball/control is very high on this blade.
Blocking the ball is also very easy and intuitive.
On matchplay, noting that I won all the games I played with ZQH while with my current blade I won 45% (same opponent for the whole training) I appreciated the great control on all strokes, the higher quality of my shots when played actively. I missed too much fh topspins, going long, with proper training this should not be an issue.
In the end a blade to keep and worth investing time. I'm very happy to have purchased it.
Well if you have a better win ratio with it you should just flat-out make the switch even if you're not "fully" got accustomed to it. Sometimes just some blade properties that one can't even notice can make a huge difference. Like 5% faster speed will make the opponent make more forced errors. That can be the difference between a win and a loss.
I've been trying out a plain H3N 39 commecrial on it and with 2 layers of Falco booster, it was very spinny and not much slower than Donic Bluegrip C2. Hurricane 3 without a shadow of a doubt is significantly more spinny than anything else. It can create its own spin really well with the right stroke.
For sure it's not as easy to create spin with it as a Tenergy 05, but like if you do a half-decent stroke it will be more spinny than anything a T05 can output.
But the spin creation is not even the best part of H3N; it doesn't lose spin!! If my opponent is making the opening loop H3 topsheet does not lose any spin. It doesn't drop the ball either(no matter how used, or shiny that ball is). Donice Bluegrip C2 is very good at countering but I feel it is good because it is losing spin but it is losing in a way and quantity that enables more control for people who lack the skills to control spin. Don't get me wrong this is a freaking great piece of engineering from ESN and probably in many ways this is superior to how H3N handles it.
But!! H3 can make speed from spin. If you have the right racket angle H3 will convert the opponents spin into your spin and you can add your own spin.
With 2 layers of Falco a commercial H3 is pretty good already with a fast racket, but I didn't see the pimples bulging on the topsheet as I can see it if I look at the Chinese players H3.
So I gave it a 3rd layer of Falco, and it is true what most people are saying, H3N orange sponge needs 3 layers of Falco. Now I can see the pimples bulging and the spin and speed are enhanced by a very significant margin. I am wondering how it will play tomorrow, I am looking forward to it very much.
Your point is correct but I still prefer to wait, official matches are a beast apartWell if you have a better win ratio with it you should just flat-out make the switch even if you're not "fully" got accustomed to it. Sometimes just some blade properties that one can't even notice can make a huge difference. Like 5% faster speed will make the opponent make more forced errors. That can be the difference between a win and a loss.