The Advanced Response Blade - The Future of Table Tennis Now! - by Anthony.R.Brown

Status
Not open for further replies.
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
This user has been banned.
Jan 2016
34
1
35
Why can't one generate spin and speed with the ARB paddle? I see is as being yet another paddle like c-pen or shake hands.

Prove to me you can generate more spin with your current paddle more than the ARB paddle. Prove to me you can generate more speed. It really is just a matter of what kind of paddle you are familiar. People play with shake hands paddle and c-pen paddles interchangeably. I have seen it. It does not make much difference to their style of play because that is more of a mental thing. It doesn't change their foot work or the ability to chose the right stroke at the right time.

I don't believe there is anything the ARB blade does to improve response or any other claims. It is just another paddle, no more no less. What is so wrong about the ARB paddle? Explain in terms of generating less spin or less speed.


The A.R.B Can generate much more Spin than a Normal Blade Because of the Whip like action possible from Flicking the Wrist! The Stability of the Grip helps a lot! Normal Blades are Top Heavy which off sets the Blade in such a way where Spin is lost! because of Instability.

The A.R.B Can produce more Speed because of the Full grip possible for that action! The Single finger on the face of the blade (Shake-Hold) can be a weakness and the wobbly off set Hold using the (Pen-Hold) can also be a weakness.

The A.R.B is more Responsive because of the Stability compared to the Instability of the (Shake-Hold) and (Pen-Hold) shown above, it is like the difference between driving an Old Car with dated Steering geometry and the Advances made to Modern Cars. :)
 
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
Member
Jan 2015
375
183
1,205
Read 4 reviews
the future is obviously here, a lot of control for the ball who stays a long time in the racket

epuisette-raquette-jmc-bois-dlx-gm-f-977-97737.jpg

It removes all shortcomings of other grips.

I know, I am a genius inventor but I prefer no statue.
 
Last edited:
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
This user has been banned.
Jan 2016
34
1
35
the future is obviously here, a lot of control for the ball who stays a long time in the racket

View attachment 8946

It removes all shortcomings of other grips.

I know, I am a genius inventor but I prefer no statue.

Your Intellectual ? Replies violoniste18 are digging a Bigger Hole of disbelief concerning your Character! the more you Post!
You Started on a High about the A.R.B ITTF Statue :) But now you have sunk to the Gutter basement level! :(
 
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
🏆 Top 1% Commenter
Well-Known Member
Dec 2010
3,769
4,559
16,101
This is the ARB equivalent for the chopper , you can't cut your opponents throat if you lose , which you can do with ARB .

the future is obviously here, a lot of control for the ball who stays a long time in the racket

View attachment 8946

It removes all shortcomings of other grips.

I know, I am a genius inventor but I prefer no statue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: violoniste18
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
This user has been banned.
Jan 2016
34
1
35
This is the ARB equivalent for the chopper , you can't cut your opponents throat if you lose , which you can do with ARB .

OK! It's beyond Me! :confused: Please Vote if anyone understands the Post above ?

YES ?

NO ? - 1
 
says Spin and more spin.
says Spin and more spin.
🏆 Top 1% Commenter
Well-Known Member
Moderator
Dec 2010
16,640
18,535
56,964
Read 11 reviews
The Advanced Response Blade - The Future of Table Tennis Now! - by Anthony.R....

@ Pnachtwey: do you see? The purpose of Anthony R Brown's (aka Damion's) posts is to try and rile people up. Entertaining and funny for a while. But at a certain point it gets old and tiresome.

In fact, Pnachtwey, it seems you are arguing his case much more effectively than it seems he is capable of doing.


Sent from Deep Space by Abacus
 
Last edited:
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
🏆 Top 1% Commenter
Well-Known Member
Moderator
Oct 2014
20,033
26,618
71,042
Read 17 reviews
@ Pnachtwey: do you see? The purpose of Anthony R Brown's (aka Damion's) posts is to try and rile people up. Entertaining and funny for a while. But at a certain point it gets old and tiresome.

In fact, Pnachtwey, it seems you are arguing his case much more effectively than it seems he is capable of doing.


Sent from Deep Space by Abacus

It's only bothersome and tiring if you even attend to it.


Pnatchwey is now the world's foremost expert on the ARB!
 
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
This user has been banned.
Nov 2010
367
135
502
ARB doesn't bother me. By now you guys should know I am a skeptic and won't believe anything ARB says without proof just like I am critical of TT manufacture's lies about tensioned rubber. This thread could be short if people would just ask the tough question at the beginning instead of being critical without justification. Then there is the piling on effect by people that don't even know what questions to ask but are critical because other people are critical.

I said above, I have written a chess program and entered it into USCF tournaments so the chess part interests me. I also had a rating of 2057 which is just below master ( 2200 ) and I have the Chess program Hiarcs. I know what ARB is doing with his chess technique but it isn't original. I am still skeptical about ARB being able to beat those chess programs. ARB doesn't specify the time controls or level he set the chess computers too or even the CPU in the computers. Were those chess matches where ARB beat the computer played at a chess tournament? If the computer is allowed to search for an average of 3 minutes per move and ARB was playing against a fast computer then,crack pot or not, that is impressive.

As far as the ARB paddle generating more spin. I doubt it because my wrist will move or rotate only so fast. If I want more spin when serving I try to hit the ball near the tip of my paddle. The farther the contact point is from the axis of rotation for my wrist the faster the spin will be. It is simple. Now how does the ARB paddle make it possible to increase the distance between the contact point and the axis of rotation of my wrist? Inquiring minds want to know. Something that should be considered is that as paddle extends away from the wrists axis of rotation the moment of inertia around the axis of rotation will be higher. I don't think this is a big deal though. The ARB paddle is yet another paddle. I don't see any advantage yet and I know it will be more difficult to manufacture. i do think ARB has made claims he can't backup.

I really do like to see videos of people using the equipment they are pushing. As I said above I don't like the Dr N videos where they are just hitting balls back and forth.

The Der Materialspezialist video impresses me. See the equipment used under pressure.

These make me want to buy a sheet of Terminator.
 
  • Like
Reactions: violoniste18
says ok, I will go back and make sure you have access. Be...
says ok, I will go back and make sure you have access. Be...
🏆 Top 1% Commenter
Well-Known Member
Nov 2010
3,550
5,928
10,356
Read 8 reviews
Oh for Jeebus' sake, what tough question did you want asked that wasn't? The only important one was, "show us a video of the thing being used". No other question matters. And it was the first one asked and it has been asked repeatedly on three different forums. However, it is painfully obvious ARB or Damion or whatever this troll calls himself has no intention of responding to it, or actually having a meaningful interaction with players. What he gets out of this can only be known by his diseased mind.

I am personally about 99% certain that this blade is a terrible idea for a bunch of reasons not worth going into, but that leaves the 1% of doubt. That is space where I could be convinced by, you know, actually seeing how it is some sort of genius idea.

The guy has been banned deservedly. Piling on came later. Sometimes piling on is deserved. At a point the pile gets high enough and starts to smell.

IMHO, this thread has no reason to exist any longer.
 
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
🏆 Top 1% Commenter
Well-Known Member
Moderator
Oct 2014
20,033
26,618
71,042
Read 17 reviews
Oh for Jeebus' sake, what tough question did you want asked that wasn't? The only important one was, "show us a video of the thing being used". No other question matters. And it was the first one asked and it has been asked repeatedly on three different forums. However, it is painfully obvious ARB or Damion or whatever this troll calls himself has no intention of responding to it, or actually having a meaningful interaction with players. What he gets out of this can only be known by his diseased mind.

I am personally about 99% certain that this blade is a terrible idea for a bunch of reasons not worth going into, but that leaves the 1% of doubt. That is space where I could be convinced by, you know, actually seeing how it is some sort of genius idea.

The guy has been banned deservedly. Piling on came later. Sometimes piling on is deserved. At a point the pile gets high enough and starts to smell.

IMHO, this thread has no reason to exist any longer.

I agree with everything except the last line. The thread gives him somewhere to pollute where he can be seemingly contained. Famous last words, eh?;)
 
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
🏆 Top 1% Commenter
Well-Known Member
Dec 2010
3,769
4,559
16,101
Let me post the first video of ARB in action as I described , pardon me if you don't understand the background, these two guys played and could not determine the winner and hence started using ARB in martial arts to cut each other's throat .......... enjoy !


OK! It's beyond Me! :confused: Please Vote if anyone understands the Post above ?

YES ?

NO ? - 1
 
Last edited:
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
This user has been banned.
Jan 2016
34
1
35
ARB doesn't bother me. By now you guys should know I am a sceptic and won't believe anything ARB says without proof just like I am critical of TT manufacture's lies about tensioned rubber. This thread could be short if people would just ask the tough question at the beginning instead of being critical without justification. Then there is the piling on effect by people that don't even know what questions to ask but are critical because other people are critical.

I said above, I have written a chess program and entered it into USCF tournaments so the chess part interests me. I also had a rating of 2057 which is just below master ( 2200 ) and I have the Chess program Hiarcs. I know what ARB is doing with his chess technique but it isn't original. I am still sceptical about ARB being able to beat those chess programs. ARB doesn't specify the time controls or level he set the chess computers too or even the CPU in the computers. Were those chess matches where ARB beat the computer played at a chess tournament? If the computer is allowed to search for an average of 3 minutes per move and ARB was playing against a fast computer then,crack pot or not, that is impressive.

The A.R.B Chess System is Very Original!!

It is the First & Only Chess System in the History of Chess to play (6) Pawns first in the Opening before any Main Pieces are played :)

At the Start of all the A.R.B Chess Videos there is a Text Clip showing the Time Controls used!

Below are Some of the example Video Clips Game in Text form :)

[Event "The A.R.B Chess System-Game 04-Analysis"]
[Date "2014.06.12"]
[Round "1"]
[Origin "Great Britain"]
[White "Stockfish 5 Chess Program"]
[White-Elo "3300+"]
[Black "Anthony.R.Brown"]
[Black-Elo "?"]
[Opening "The A.R.B Chess System"]
[Time "60 Seconds Each Per Move"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d6 {last book move} 3. Nf3 h6 {Controls g5} 4. Bd3 a6 {
Secures b5} 5. O-O g6 6. c4 b6 7. Nc3 Bg7 8. Be3 Ne7 9. Qd2 g5 10. a3 Ng6 11.
d5 e5 12. b4 O-O {Black is behind in development.} 13. Rfc1 Nf4 14. Bc2 f5 15.
exf5 Bxf5 16. Bxf5 Rxf5 17. Qc2 Rf7 18. Nd2 Nd7 19. f3 Qf6 20. Rab1 g4 21. fxg4
Qg5 22. Kh1 Qxg4 23. Nde4 Nf6 24. Rf1 Raf8 25. Rf2 Nxe4 26. Qxe4 h5 27. a4 h4
28. a5 bxa5 29. bxa5 Qd7 30. h3 Rf6 31. Rb7 Nxh3 32. Rxf6 Rxf6 33. Rb8+ Kf7 34.
Qxh4 Nf4 35. Bxf4 exf4 (35... Rxf4 $4 36. Qh5+ Ke7 37. c5 dxc5 38. Qg6 $18) 36.
Qh5+ Rg6 37. Ne2 Qe7 38. Rb7 (38. Nxf4 $4 {taking the pawn will cause White grave problems}
Qe1+ 39. Kh2 Qg3+ 40. Kh1 Qxf4 $19) 38... Qe4 39. Rxc7+ Kf8 40. Rc8+ Ke7 41. Qh4+ {
Attacking the isolated pawn on f4} Bf6 42. Qh7+ Bg7 43. Qh4+ Bf6 44. Qh7+ Bg7
45. Qh4+ 1/2-1/2

[Event "The A.R.B Chess System-Game 05-Analysis"]
[Date "2014.09.27"]
[Round "2"]
[Origin "Great Britain"]
[White "Anthony.R.Brown"]
[White-Elo "?"]
[Black "Stockfish 5 Chess Program"]
[Black-Elo "3300+"]
[Opening "The A.R.B Chess System"]
[Time "60 Seconds Each Per Move"]
[Result "1-0"]
1. e3 e5 2. d3 d5 {last book move} 3. h3 Nf6 4. a3 {Secures b4} c5 5. g3 Nc6 6.
b3 Bd6 7. Bg2 Be6 8. Ne2 O-O 9. g4 d4 {This push gains space} 10. e4 b5 11. O-O
c4 12. bxc4 bxc4 13. Nd2 c3 14. Nf3 Rb8 15. Ng5 Bc8 16. f4 Nd7 17. f5 Be7 18.
Nf3 f6 19. h4 {White prepares the advance g5} Nc5 20. g5 Kh8 21. g6 hxg6 22.
fxg6 Bg4 23. Ng3 Qe8 24. h5 Rb2 {The rook dominates} 25. Kh2 Bd6 26. Bh3 Bxf3
27. Rxf3 Ne7 28. Nf5 {White prepares h6} Nxf5 29. Bxf5 Qa4 30. Rf2 Kg8 31. h6 Rxc2
32. Rxc2 Qb3 33. Raa2 Rb8 34. Qf3 Bf8 35. Kg3 Rb6 36. Rh2 Qb1 37. Rac2 Rb7
38. Qh5 a6 39. hxg7 Bxg7 40. Qh7+ Kf8 41. Bh6 Qg1+ 42. Rcg2 Qe1+ 43. Rf2 Qe3+
44. Bxe3 dxe3 45. Qh8+ $1 {the final nail in the coffin} Bxh8 46. Rxh8+ Ke7 47. g7 Kd6
48. g8=Q Kc6 (48... Kc7 {does not improve anything} 49. Bc8 exf2 50. Bxb7 f1=N+ 51. Kh3
c2 52. Qc8+ Kb6 53. Qc6+ Ka5 54. Qxc5+ Ka4 55. Qb4#) 49. Qd5+ Kb6 50. Rc8 Rg7+
51. Bg4 Rc7 52. Rxf6+ Ka5 53. Qc4 Nxe4+ 54. Qxe4 Rc4 (54... Rb7 {cannot change destiny}
55. Qxb7 c2 56. Rxa6#) 55. Rxc4 c2 56. Qxe5# 1-0

[Event "The A.R.B Chess System-Game 06-Short"]
[Date "2015.04.08"]
[Origin "Great Britain"]
[White "Stockfish 6 Chess Program"]
[White-Elo "3300+"]
[Black "Anthony.R.Brown"]
[Black-Elo "?"]
[Opening "The A.R.B Chess System"]
[Time "180 Seconds Each Per Move"]
[Result "0-1"]
1. d4 e6 2. Nf3 d6 3. c4 h6 4. e4 a6 5. Nc3 g6 6. Be2 b6 7. O-O Bg7 8. Be3
Ne7 9. Qd2 Bb7 10. d5 e5 11. b4 Nd7 12. c5 Bc8 13. c6 Nf6 14. Qd1 Ng4 15.
Bd2 f5 16. Ne1 Nf6 17. f3 f4 18. Nd3 g5 19. Nf2 h5 20. Be1 Ng6 21. a4 Kf7
22. Rb1 Qg8 23. Rb2 Qh7 24. Nd3 g4 25. Qc1 Bh6 26. Qb1 Bg5 27. Qc2 Qh6 28.
b5 a5 29. Nd1 Kg7 30. Qb1 Bh4 31. Bd2 g3 32. h3 Ng4 33. Bc3 Nh2 34. Kh1 Bf6
35. Ne1 Qg5 36. Qc2 Qh4 37. Bd3 Bxh3 38. gxh3 Qxh3 39. Qg2 Qxg2+ 40. Kxg2
Nxf1 41. Bxf1 h4 42. Kh3 Nf8 43. Kg2 h3+ 44. Kg1 Ng6 45. Rd2 Rag8 46. Nb2
Kf7 47. Nbd3 g2 48. Nxg2 Nh4 49. Ne1 Rg3 50. Rf2 hxg2 51. Bxg2 Nxg2 52.
Rxg2 Rgh3 53. Kf1 Bh4 54. Ke2 Bxe1 55. Bxe1 Rh2 56. Rxh2 Rxh2+ 57. Bf2 Rh1
58. Be1 Ke7 59. Kd2 Rh2+ 60. Kc3 Ke8 61. Kc4 Rh3 62. Bf2 Kd8 63. Be1 Rxf3
64. Bh4+ Kc8 65. Be7 Re3 66. Bh4 Rxe4+ 67. Kd3 Rxa4 68. Be1 e4+ 69. Ke2
Ra2+ 70. Kf1 e3 71. Bc3 Rc2 72. Bd4 Rd2 73. Bf6 f3 74. Kg1 f2+ 75. Kg2 Rd1
76. Bg5 f1=Q+ 77. Kg3 Rd2 78. Kg4 Rg2+ 79. Kh5 Qf5 80. Kh6 Qxg5+ 81. Kh7
Qg7# *

And below loads of The A.R.B Chess System Info & Examples! :)

https://chessprogramming.wikispaces.com/The+A.R.B+Chess+System

And the Proof of the Pudding as they say Which really Silenced all the Skeptics/Critics/Non Believers is the 1st A.R.B Chess System Published Game below! By one of the largest Chess Periodicals! (New In Chess) The game was thoroughly Tested by them! :)

The A.R.B Chess System - 1st Officially Published Game - New In Chess Yearbook 115
 
Last edited:
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
This user has been banned.
Jan 2016
34
1
35
ARB doesn't bother me. By now you guys should know I am a skeptic and won't believe anything ARB says without proof just like I am critical of TT manufacture's lies about tensioned rubber. This thread could be short if people would just ask the tough question at the beginning instead of being critical without justification. Then there is the piling on effect by people that don't even know what questions to ask but are critical because other people are critical.

As far as the ARB paddle generating more spin. I doubt it because my wrist will move or rotate only so fast. If I want more spin when serving I try to hit the ball near the tip of my paddle. The farther the contact point is from the axis of rotation for my wrist the faster the spin will be. It is simple. Now how does the ARB paddle make it possible to increase the distance between the contact point and the axis of rotation of my wrist? Inquiring minds want to know. Something that should be considered is that as paddle extends away from the wrists axis of rotation the moment of inertia around the axis of rotation will be higher. I don't think this is a big deal though. The ARB paddle is yet another paddle. I don't see any advantage yet and I know it will be more difficult to manufacture. i do think ARB has made claims he can't backup.

The A.R.B Paddle Generates more Spin from the Wrist because of the Action! Try Spinning a Ball from the Hand using only a Straight Hand movement without Bending the Wrist :( Now try Spinning a Ball from the Hand using the Wrist :)
The Stability Problem using a Normal Blade Cancels out the...(The farther the contact point is from the axis of rotation for my wrist the faster the spin will be) :(
You don't increase the distance between the contact point and the axis of rotation with the A.R.B because it's not needed the Wrist is more than enough! :) and again the further you get away from the Base point of a Spin Serve Etc. the Stability Problem kicks in :(
As far as the Manufacture goes! ? easily as easy as a Normal Blade :)
 
Last edited:
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
This user has been banned.
Jan 2016
34
1
35
I don't understand how you are supposed to feel the ball with this grip. The touch will be horrible, whatever the blade is, because of this grip. Go for the pistol design is you want more leverage effect to generate more spin.


The pistol design Suffers from the Trapped finger/fingers problem regarding the Hole in the Blade,which hinders a Players ability to Twist the Hand/Wrist (Just give your finger a Twist! and you will know how Restricting it can be :( )
Plus the Weight affects Speed & Mobility Where as the A.R.B is about the same Weight as a Normal Blade! :)
 
I must be missing how you are supposed to handle your ARB grip then. Because from what I see, the ARB grip is even more restricting. And you are missing how the pistol design is supposed to be used, the "trapped finger" you are speeking about is in fact helping to achieve better wrist speed, yup you are supposed to use the trenght of the finger to achieve faster wrist speed.

You must understand that at very very very high level, the strenght of the finger is also used to achieve faster wrist speed, even with shakehand grip, the pistol grip makes it easier and more natural. And in fact, your ARB grip makes the strenght of the finger un-usable.

Here in this video :
If you understand french, the techincal level are describled at the end :
transmit the power via the elbow : ementary school technical level
transmit the power via the elbow + forearm : middle school technical level
transmit the power via the elbow + forearm + wirst : university technical level
transmit the power via the elbow + forearm + wirst + index finger : phd technical level

You grip makes un-usable the power of index finger (or any other finger), plus it destroy the touch.

Watch the video from 13:30, it speeks about the touch and technical level. You will undderstand why the ARB destroys touch.

Mr Zhen has trained various world champion (last one : wang hao), he is the undisputed reference of the training of U12 table tennis players.

Also here, from 7:30 : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gCuf9tax3A
Its Mr Wang (a great coach, at the time of the video, he was still the coach of the legendary JM Saive), he also explain how it important to have a relaxed index finger for both touch and maximum power transmission : you lose both with ARB grip, at least with pistol grip you """"only"""" lose the touch part but keep the power transmission.

But I have the feeling that you won't understand what I'm saying since you are emotionally linked to this ARB grip. Emotions are killing objectivity.
 
Last edited:
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
New Member
Jan 2016
2
1
3
ARB doesn't bother me. By now you guys should know I am a skeptic and won't believe anything ARB says without proof just like I am critical of TT manufacture's lies about tensioned rubber. This thread could be short if people would just ask the tough question at the beginning instead of being critical without justification. Then there is the piling on effect by people that don't even know what questions to ask but are critical because other people are critical.

I said above, I have written a chess program and entered it into USCF tournaments so the chess part interests me. I also had a rating of 2057 which is just below master ( 2200 ) and I have the Chess program Hiarcs. I know what ARB is doing with his chess technique but it isn't original. I am still skeptical about ARB being able to beat those chess programs. ARB doesn't specify the time controls or level he set the chess computers too or even the CPU in the computers. Were those chess matches where ARB beat the computer played at a chess tournament? If the computer is allowed to search for an average of 3 minutes per move and ARB was playing against a fast computer then,crack pot or not, that is impressive.

As far as the ARB paddle generating more spin. I doubt it because my wrist will move or rotate only so fast. If I want more spin when serving I try to hit the ball near the tip of my paddle. The farther the contact point is from the axis of rotation for my wrist the faster the spin will be. It is simple. Now how does the ARB paddle make it possible to increase the distance between the contact point and the axis of rotation of my wrist? Inquiring minds want to know. Something that should be considered is that as paddle extends away from the wrists axis of rotation the moment of inertia around the axis of rotation will be higher. I don't think this is a big deal though. The ARB paddle is yet another paddle. I don't see any advantage yet and I know it will be more difficult to manufacture. i do think ARB has made claims he can't backup.

I really do like to see videos of people using the equipment they are pushing. As I said above I don't like the Dr N videos where they are just hitting balls back and forth.

The Der Materialspezialist video impresses me. See the equipment used under pressure.

These make me want to buy a sheet of Terminator.

Fantastic to watch ............. im sure it will inspire many people to choose the sport of table tennis

PS he will need bandages on his elbow using that for the next 6 months :0
 
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
This user has been banned.
Jan 2016
34
1
35
I must be missing how you are supposed to handle your ARB grip then. Because from what I see, the ARB grip is even more restricting. And you are missing how the pistol design is supposed to be used, the "trapped finger" you are speeking about is in fact helping to achieve better wrist speed, yup you are supposed to use the trenght of the finger to achieve faster wrist speed.

You must understand that at very very very high level, the strenght of the finger is also used to achieve faster wrist speed, even with shakehand grip, the pistol grip makes it easier and more natural. And in fact, your ARB grip makes the strenght of the finger un-usable.

Flexibility and Freedom of Movement (Trapped Finger/s in Holes! Restrict Both!) are the most important things!

Quote: "Be Formless Like Water" Bruce-Lee-Quote-Be-like-Water.jpg

And How the Flexibility and Freedom of Movement is Shown in the A.R.B Grip below :)

D - Now the Future! LOOP-HOLD.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top