This guy is too funny.
Again more distortions from StupidCarl.
The man who said he was looping from a Newgy at speed 25 and then said it was 30. Then when asked about it, insisted it was speed 30 and that I was lying to say it was 25 when it was him who said it. I would say that if Pnachtwey is saying I distort things it actually is a compliment. Coming from a guy who takes random quotes that have been answered multiple times and repeats silly attacks as though the same statements haven't been gone over again and again.
You like to bog people down in stupid arguments by throwing out accusations. But you don't seem to answer any of the questions asked of you because you just like starting arguments.
I said NextLevel admitted he couldn't loop back chopped balls with T25. I can.
And the idea that you keep repeating this nonsense in spite of the fact that the context for the statement has been explained again and again. But it doesn't seem to matter what explanations of things like this you have heard, you keep on repeating the small, simple, stupid original statements ad infinitum.
"NextLevel admitted he couldn't loop back chopped balls with T25. I can."
Even though you know that what NextLevel meant was something different. In a match with players of a decent level, looping with T25 is harder than with T05 and many other high throw rubbers and the change in the technique of the stroke to do it in the random situation of a match would not be worth it.
The whole point was that high or low throw shouldn't make much difference in looping back chopped balls if you match the spin of the ball.
And the fact is, if this was actually the case then there might be some productive discussion on the subject but instead you just keep bringing up one line slogans again and again. Nobody really ever meant that you cannot loop backspin with T25 but there are rubbers that work much better for this and the amount that you would have to change technique is not worth it. So why waste our time continually repeating statements that have already been answered so many times? Because your actual purpose is not to discuss matters but to try and create straw men to call idiots.
The person who said the quote you keep repeating there doesn't actually exist because what was meant was something different but you refuse to pay attention and listen. All of this has to do with the obvious emotional problems you have that have gone unchecked for years and the fact that you obviously fall somewhere on the autism spectrum.
And so you make idiotic statements like this:
SupidCarl doesn't understand Newton's laws of motion. Carl, you can't just read the laws. You must understand them.Arguing with stupid carl is futile.
There is no reason to respond to idiotic statements like this. They only make you look like the small person you are and none of what I just quoted actually means anything. There is also no reason to argue with a person like you because you ignore all the stuff you find convenient to ignore like the fact that your shots have very little spin and just keep bringing up dumb slogans that actually just make you seem even more foolish than you are.
He still can't explain how I kill the spin.
I don't have to explain it. The video shows balls with little spin. I know I can take a high backspin ball and drive forward and up into it making pretty flat contact and put a ball back with very little spin because of how I get the ball to dig into the rubber and sponge and bottom out at the wood. If I had a robot spitting out balls to the same spot, I could do this over and over again. The friction of the rubber can grab the ball depending on how you contact it and increase or slow the spin.
And the fact is it takes very little technique to do what I just described but to brush the ball delicately, get the ball to sink in, feel the point where the sponge distorts and the topsheet grabs the ball and add acceleration--in other words, to loop a backspin ball--takes a lot more technique than to hit flat.
I have already talked about how I know someone who hits dead balls that look like loops on purpose. But I guess you ignored that as well because you like popping out the same silly slogans like this next one:
He thinks that the ball actually stops spinning when you loop back a chopped ball.
This is another one of those silly things he repeats over and over grasping at straws trying to make someone else look stupid and really he only makes himself look stupid.
I have already already answered this nonsense a few times.
But, here goes, I will do it again. Perhaps this is what happens and what I said that Pnachtwey is referring to:
When you are looping vs backspin and the racket speed as it brushes the ball reaches approximately the same speed as the speed of the spin, then the ball's spin, in relation to the speed of the racket is not moving and the rubber grabs the ball as the ball sinks into the sponge.
If the racket's speed is the same as the speed of the spin, then the spin is not moving in relation to the rubber which is in contact with it.
If as this happens the racket's speed is still accelerating and surpasseses the speed of the spin than you could add more spin to the ball than was originally on it. The rebound of the rubber after the ball has sunk into the sponge enough for the topsheet to distort and grab the ball also could be adding to the spin.
I don't know. Perhaps that is not what happens. But, when the speed of the racket brushing past the ball is the same as the speed of the spin, then they are not moving in relation to each other because they are going the same speed in the same direction.
And none of this information would make anyone a better player so I will leave you all with one last quote from Killerspitt who has addressed everything that needs to be addressed to this weird argumentative guy who likes to call people names and is hoping to make others look like fools because he is a small, small person.
Honestly guys, this is the same and same fight other and other again. I also tried to explain, but sometime it is just impossible.
If he cannot see that there is close to NO SPIN comming out of his FH stroke, I think it's just impossible to discuss further. He just has to open his eyes, there is close to NO SPIN. I don't believe AT ALL that he doesn't see it (every single person here is seeing that there is no spin in is FH stroke, everyone but him), but still he is pretending that there is heavy spin, despite everyone seeing and telling him there is not : the guy is just dishonest.
What the point of arguing with such a person ? There is not.
It's too bad, because beeing engineer myself (also having a master degree in fundamental physics), and also coaching when I got time......I was in the mood to give advices to improve his technic and his understanding of table tennis, I even though it could have been great to see his improvements, his new strokes and seeing him getting more ball feeling (because he doesn't feel if he produces spin or not).
But seeing that he doesn't even admit a simple fact which anyone can see (there is NO SPIN), means that there is no possible constructible discussion with him.
I just hope, nobody here became disgusted by physics and engineers, we are not like that.....when our own video is obviously proving that we are wrong.......we admit that we are wrong somewhere, usually......and we don't call people "fools" or "stupid" because they don't know what the second law of Newton is.
My best suggestion would be to seek out psychological help. I don't mean this as an insult. You obviously have no clue but fall into a bunch of standard patterns. Perhaps you have entertained us with your lack of self awareness but you would do well to try and seek help.
Sent from TheSecretHideout using TheInfamousNSASpyPhone
