Der_echte,
Of the years I'm on different forum platforms, most forum members are fans (and not really in the semi professional space of coaches, community leaders, club owners, businesses etc) and the number one priority is for self fulfillment in the game (yes, they might help each other, some might be semi professional space) - for example, they don't care about where they buy - as long as it is the cheapest. Or they can afford it so it doesn't matter if the next rubber is 100USD, if the kid in the club can't, not his/her problem.
Mean while, I have been encouraging people to buy local, so the sales can contribute locally and the "marketing support" from brands can come back to your local country.
I know how the system works. I'm not just a consumer or fan, I'm looking at the bigger picture of development.
Heck, most of my profits are given to communities, coaches. I could easily make double the profit as I do have a form of monopoly in South Africa. But since Table Tennis for me is my passion and I have other forms of businesses to keep me afloat, I am in it with a development heart and not purely for profit heart.
Why I say you should support your market and look at the bigger picture is like if one does not pay tax in the country you live, and you choose to give it to your neighboring country - they get all the perks while you on the other side don't understand why there is no perks in your local country.
Lucky, my business won't be heavily effect like you stated in this rainbow nonse.
I am lucky where I don't need to order by MOQ (boxes of 25 rubbers per model/colour/size), I order way less - thus lower risk. But I am stating even if I order like I will before - my cost would go up because I foresee the brands increasing a % to fit in this rainbow stategy.
From my initial explanation on how production work (vendor/manufacturer, and not sellers like me and you), there seem to still be confusion.
These brands can't just release 1 model of a new colour to test out. It makes no financial sense, no sales sense, no marketing senes.
If such sense makes it possible in the first place - they will not have so many models - as to me that is shooting themselves in the foot or burning money...
Lets take Butterfly as an example.
If they have Tenergy, there is like how many models inside the Tenergy family? 8 models, and with a potential of 2 to 3 sizes each - that is 16 to 24 models.
So which one do they pick to introduce a pink topsheet? or they do it to all 8, but only 1 size, or does it need to be 16?
Or do they bring out a new model (way more costs) and have one colour there?
But what is such specs is not welcomed by consumer?
Or they can do it based on a old rubber like Sriver - but who will use Sriver nowadays?
Or lets take Stiga unreleased rubber - "???", which has H M and S options x 3, that is 9 models. Which one do they go with say green?, all 9?
The companies will obviously need to form a sales/marketing/production strategy to this rainbow issue.
I see this as business insanity, as I don't foresee a huge market percentage giving a fuss about using more colours, but companies will need to avail them self (and resources) to go this route.
It will cost money to go this route and profit return won't be there (thus unnecessary risk taking) - unless I am wrong with the unknown surveys which says going rainbow colour will be the fix to the problem and with that we will have more females in the sport and its the solution to get more basement players to becomes proper members.....
I don't know what they want to fix, and I don't know what the reason of the rainbow colour idea, and exactly how small this market is.
I guess Apple also shot themselves in the foot (but they have a lot of money to burn, some guys are right, our TT brands, or rather TT consumers, don't have a lot of money to burn)