This user has no status.
This user has no status.
Member
Have not tried T05 on the blade, but one can easily picture it as a good shakehand FH rubber. A different touch comparing to D05. It would probably have a clearer response while having lower dwell overall, more difficult to control in short game, and feeling more direct/livelier than D05 in continuous rallies.
(Edit on Apr 11: Tried T05 finally and confirmed the above assumption. Huge springiness and the ball shoots out like rocket. Dwell is marginally acceptable to me but pretty short. It is especially a liability in serves, since spin is decreased without compensation in speed. In fact, speed also decreased since I cannot get hold of the ball efficiently and lost confidence for no reason. The only advantage for me is really high speed kill shots. Overall the feeling of being unnecessarily cautious is just detrimental to my performance. One thing to take away is learning to angle so precisely just to not lose a point lol, did learn something after all...)
I mainly play old school players who likes to play tricky placements and backspin game, so in my case D05 has better control and versatility as a penholder. However, there were a few instances where D05 felt a little stubborn when I was reaching for the blade's highest gears far from the table. I had a feeling that activating the blade is easier than the rubber and I had to exert additional effort to hit through the sponge.
(Edit on Mar 17: Found out the problem and it was the full coverage edge tape, took it off and there was no problem again. Having that said, more springiness is definitely welcomed in that situation.)
(Edit again on Apr 11: T05 works better in mid to far distances but much poorer close to the table. Probably due to difference in trajectory. D05 has a high throw and therefore limits its peak performance range to mid distance, while flatter trajectory of T05 makes it shine at mid distance+ but does not have enough space for performance in close distance, not to mention short game.)
Some additional input, from what I learnt from the blade, it encourages and rewards always wrapping around the ball and add topspin to create a nice arc in both attack and defense, just like how Wang Manyu and many other Chinese players do. Otherwise either the return is weaker or the ball shoots long easily. The way I assess rubber suitability is how easy they achieve this style of stroke.
PS A sudden thought about Cybershape, where flat hits and semi-passive blocking works so well. Completely different worlds. Looks like Stiga did some hard work to come up with these designs.
(Edit on Apr 11: Tried T05 finally and confirmed the above assumption. Huge springiness and the ball shoots out like rocket. Dwell is marginally acceptable to me but pretty short. It is especially a liability in serves, since spin is decreased without compensation in speed. In fact, speed also decreased since I cannot get hold of the ball efficiently and lost confidence for no reason. The only advantage for me is really high speed kill shots. Overall the feeling of being unnecessarily cautious is just detrimental to my performance. One thing to take away is learning to angle so precisely just to not lose a point lol, did learn something after all...)
I mainly play old school players who likes to play tricky placements and backspin game, so in my case D05 has better control and versatility as a penholder. However, there were a few instances where D05 felt a little stubborn when I was reaching for the blade's highest gears far from the table. I had a feeling that activating the blade is easier than the rubber and I had to exert additional effort to hit through the sponge.
(Edit on Mar 17: Found out the problem and it was the full coverage edge tape, took it off and there was no problem again. Having that said, more springiness is definitely welcomed in that situation.)
(Edit again on Apr 11: T05 works better in mid to far distances but much poorer close to the table. Probably due to difference in trajectory. D05 has a high throw and therefore limits its peak performance range to mid distance, while flatter trajectory of T05 makes it shine at mid distance+ but does not have enough space for performance in close distance, not to mention short game.)
Some additional input, from what I learnt from the blade, it encourages and rewards always wrapping around the ball and add topspin to create a nice arc in both attack and defense, just like how Wang Manyu and many other Chinese players do. Otherwise either the return is weaker or the ball shoots long easily. The way I assess rubber suitability is how easy they achieve this style of stroke.
PS A sudden thought about Cybershape, where flat hits and semi-passive blocking works so well. Completely different worlds. Looks like Stiga did some hard work to come up with these designs.
Last edited: