This user has no status.
Have you played a Mazunov?I would say your current setup is a big step up from your old one. ALC + butterfly rubbers is at least twice faster than your old setup.
If you have the money I would go for a hard 5-ply wood + 1.9mm Tenergy
Hi there! Not got a set up yet! Hopefully when i have worked out what feels good and experimented a bit. I can get him something suitable! Good job I realised how quick the new rubbers are first....@Crewdy, welcome back. What setup does your son have, or what do you plan?
Thank you for the suggestions. There are so many different rubbers and blades its daunting! Its a gamble ordering online from reviews and not being able to try it out first.The truth of the matter is, you could listen to half the group and keep using what you are using and just train till you get used to it. Or you could slow down the setup and put that one on the shelf for a few months. Either approach will work. Which one is better for you? I am going to say: you get to decide which one you would prefer to do.
If you chose to slow things down for a little while here are a few suggestions:
Blades:
1) Butterfly Primorac Off- : (all wood, 5 ply).
2) Butterfly Petr Korbel : (all wood, 5 ply) same plies as above but a little faster, either this or #1 will be a lot like your Innerforce ALC but without the composite (ALC: Arylate + Carbon) layer.
3) Tibhar Stratus Power Wood : (all wood, 5 ply) a lot like the Korbel but less expensive and more easily broken.
4) Avalox P500 : (all wood, 5 ply) the above blades have a Limba-Limba-Ayous-Limba-Limba construction which makes them have a soft feeling; this blade is Koto-Spruce-Ayous-Spruce-Koto. Koto as the top wood ply makes the surface harder. Spruce under the Koto has a really nice feel and makes it springy and responsive. If you want a blade with slightly harder feel for crisper shots, this is a great blade.
There are dozens of other blades that I could add to this list but, the first three will have a softer feel and they will all feel similar and similar to the Innerforce ALC in some ways, but not as fast. The Avalox P500 will be in the same basic speed range as the first three but will have a different feel. Any of them are good choices. So would a dozen other blades like the Xiom Offensive S.
Rubbers: you may as well start with something simple. Lazer recommended Yasaka Rakza 7. That would be a good choice. So would Xiom Vega Pro or Xiom Vega Europe (pro is a little harder, Europe is a little softer). Rakza 7 or either Vega rubber would help you get used to the newer kind of rubbers while allowing you to have more control in your shot making. So:
Rubbers:
1) Yasaka Rakza 7
2) Xiom Vega Pro or Europe
Again, if you just use what you have and do some training for a few weeks, you will get used to what you have. If you got a setup like: Korbel + R7 + R7 (or put any of the blades above with any of the rubbers, and you could do R7 on one side and Vega Pro or Europe on the other so you get to test both), you may get used to things a little sooner and a little more gracefully.
There are tons of other blades and rubbers I could have mentioned. But the tendency is to have too many options and then to not be able to choose. So.....I gave you a small number of options. Any of the other options mentioned in the thread would likely be fine as well.
PS: any chance you can film and post footage of your current standard of play? It may actually help people give a more specific answer to questions you have.
Rakza 7 is a lot bouncier than G09cSo on the rubber speeds from slowest to fastest,
Hurricane 3, Rakza 7, Glayzer 09C
Hurricane being the tackiest? But Rakza 7 closest to the feel of modern day rubbers?
I don't mind experimenting with a few rubbers especially something like the Hurricane 3 as its relatively cheap! But the Rakza 7 is nearly the same price as the Glayzer.
So on the rubber speeds from slowest to fastest,
Hurricane 3, Rakza 7, Glayzer 09C
Hurricane being the tackiest? But Rakza 7 closest to the feel of modern day rubbers?
I don't mind experimenting with a few rubbers especially something like the Hurricane 3 as its relatively cheap! But the Rakza 7 is nearly the same price as the Glayzer.
You might like a slower rubber like Pimplepark Epos on forehand to gain more control or perhaps a Palio AK47 Yellow that isn't that grippy with more focus on control, and it's linear...Hi all. After a lot of years I have returned to table tennis and I’m able to introduce my son to the sport!
So after a few club nights with the new plastic/bigger ball and lots more attack/spin in the the game than I remember I bought myself a shiny new blade and rubbers!
After reading lots of reviews I went for a butterfly Innerforce ALC blade and the new Glayzer 09C rubbers.
Internet reviews say the Glayzer is Slow (which for a pro it probably is) but to my surprise it’s much quicker than the butterfly Ekrips I used back in the day. With the blade feels really quick and has a very high throw angle totally different from what I remember!! I feel like I’m having to close the bat angle to nearly Horizontal to return the ball and not hit long off the table!
I’m an average player with a better backhand than forehand. It feels quite natural playing backhand shots with the set up but I’m holding back on forehand for fear of hitting long which is happening more often than not.
Should I have ignored the internet reviews and gone with slower blade and rubbers?
Or is it worth sticking with and putting in more time!
In fact I did play with a K series Mazunov, it's extremely fast and heavy (>100g) for a 5-plyHave you played a Mazunov?
I have two and both are around 1500hz and much much faster than my inner (and outer) ALC blades (also both 98-100g)
I grew up using Chinese rubber, Friendship and Globe 999. I guess I am used to it.So on the rubber speeds from slowest to fastest,
Hurricane 3, Rakza 7, Glayzer 09C
Hurricane being the tackiest? But Rakza 7 closest to the feel of modern day rubbers?
I don't mind experimenting with a few rubbers especially something like the Hurricane 3 as its relatively cheap! But the Rakza 7 is nearly the same price as the Glayzer.
So on the rubber speeds from slowest to fastest,
Hurricane 3, Rakza 7, Glayzer 09C
Hurricane being the tackiest? But Rakza 7 closest to the feel of modern day rubbers?
I don't mind experimenting with a few rubbers especially something like the Hurricane 3 as its relatively cheap! But the Rakza 7 is nearly the same price as the Glayzer.
But that is what will give you that, "'Hell! Yeah" satisfaction feelin'In plain English, that’s like giving a newly qualified driver a rocket ship to control.
After playing today I think it is the high throw angle that is causing me issues! I am used to brushing (The Ekrips) with a big loop in a more upwards motion to get the ball over the net with spin and speed.From what i remember playing back when you did, Ekrips was quite Mark V like (which I used with Tibhar Rapid Dtecs that was a great rubber too ) which back then was reasonably fast top end rubber - but in modern terms is very slow, and without the catapult effect of modern rubbers. Slower than the Glayzers even.
It is a very different game now with much more pace and almost flat hitting in comparison of the spin of the older game (21 points 38mm ball etc). And also coming back to the sport after a big break a while back like you, you will have to change technique -I imagine the throw angle maybe the biggest problem that you are experiencing with G09c.
The rubber and blade you have chosen are very good - they aren't the issue (though i much prefer the Glayzer series on outer carbon blades - but that would not be a good choice for now). It will be technique that isnt right and feel strange, but it will come with practice.
You have two options - stick with it, (ideally with coaching) if not too demoralising atm, or switch to something that will feel similar to Ekrips an older generation rubber - Mark v, Roundell, Sriver etc.
But a word of caution if i may - it is very rare people underestimate there skills after a long break, more often than not they overestimate (or have rose tinted spectacles on certainly when thinking back - we never remember the aspects we weren't as good at
If i was you I would chose option one - dont spend anymore on equipment right now and spend it on coaching.
I am pretty much agreeing with what @NextLevel is saying - just in more words - but i would stay away from H3 or something like that on FH coming back to the sport.
The commercial version of the H3 37 in Europe is called "soft".If you want to try the H3, I'd suggest the H3 H37, which sadly, is provincial only (not commercial afaik). On the BH I don't think you will need harder, and on the FH, if you happen to like it, you can go up as you wish...
If it were me, based on what you have said so far, I would focus on adjusting my technique from what you describe (older style) to the more closed face, forward motion oriented drives, topspin’s and loops - these will ultimately serve you better as you continue to improve and move forwards in your game.After playing today I think it is the high throw angle that is causing me issues! I am used to brushing (The Ekrips) with a big loop in a more upwards motion to get the ball over the net with spin and speed.
I let my son have a go with my bat today and I used a wood 5 ply, literally no tackiness, very low throw angle and very thin sponge rental bat which I could control and loop much better. I could use a full motion and effort. It felt much safer!
Not sure how this would work when more speed and power is coming back at me though. The backhand is much less of an issue as naturally I use a more closed bat angle!
Closing the angle on the forehand feels uncomfortable at the minute and is causing me more errors with less surface area of the bat to hit with in a more forwards motion.
As Lodro said at the start of the thread a lot of players seem to be using two different rubbers and from what I can gather the DHS hurricane rubbers and similar are popular on the forehand and have a lower throw angle than the Glayzer and similar rubbers. Which would allow more of a upwards brush loop motion keeping the ball lower over the net with more spin.
What would be the advantages to learning to use the Glayzer (apart from that I already have it)?
The point of the "throw angle" is to enable you to play aggressive shots with the spin and the power/speed moving in largely the same direction. Right now, you are trying to brush for spin using an open racket face but brushing upwards on the ball thinly, when with modern tubbers, you can open the racket, hit into the ball much more open and aggressively and close over the ball/brush and get a really spinny and powerful shot. Or you can close the angle and pick up the ball with a single awing even on some heavy backspin.So The same forward motion produces spin and speed at the same time for the most part.After playing today I think it is the high throw angle that is causing me issues! I am used to brushing (The Ekrips) with a big loop in a more upwards motion to get the ball over the net with spin and speed.
I let my son have a go with my bat today and I used a wood 5 ply, literally no tackiness, very low throw angle and very thin sponge rental bat which I could control and loop much better. I could use a full motion and effort. It felt much safer!
Not sure how this would work when more speed and power is coming back at me though. The backhand is much less of an issue as naturally I use a more closed bat angle!
Closing the angle on the forehand feels uncomfortable at the minute and is causing me more errors with less surface area of the bat to hit with in a more forwards motion.
As Lodro said at the start of the thread a lot of players seem to be using two different rubbers and from what I can gather the DHS hurricane rubbers and similar are popular on the forehand and have a lower throw angle than the Glayzer and similar rubbers. Which would allow more of a upwards brush loop motion keeping the ball lower over the net with more spin.
What would be the advantages to learning to use the Glayzer (apart from that I already have it)?
There is no good enough or not good enough. It all depends on how you play.If you want to try the H3, I'd suggest the H3 H37, which sadly, is provincial only (not commercial afaik). On the BH I don't think you will need harder, and on the FH, if you happen to like it, you can go up as you wish...
Let me put it this way about H3: Back in the days my BH was not good enough to use faster ESN, so I used the H3 H37. When I improved and played against better players I face pressure on the BH, so I started using ESN rubbers and I like it on the BH. And now, my BH is not good enough the use H3 H37. Hopefully, one day ;-)
There is no good enough or not good enough. It all depends on how you play.
I use Hurricane on the forehand. BH is Rakza 7 soft or C-1 2.0mm sponge. Eventually I hope to be "good enough" to upgrade to max sponge for Rakza 7 soft. Then after that I don't care. Should I upgrade to Rakza 7 regular? who knows? Should I upgrade to DNA pro XH like 53 degree or Tenergy 05 hard like a real table tennis pro? No because I don't plan to train that hard.
Kreanga for a while was using T05 fx on his backhand which is about 42 or 43 degree ESN rubber. Was he not good enough for harder rubber?
I am only chiming in because there are harder and harder ESN rubbers now. And I do get the sense that if you can master these 50+ degree rubber on the backhand side, then it means you are a pro. Honestly, I don't care. I want to enjoy the sport and not have to train five hours a day.....