Politics - Any and All Political Discussions Not Really Related to TT

This user has no status.
This user has no status.
🏆 Top 1% Commenter
Well-Known Member
Moderator
Oct 2014
20,100
26,703
71,276
Read 17 reviews
You keep repeating "oh, just make counteragruments" but haven't you paid attention that people like Zeio and Igor don't interact and just keep shitposting? :)
What's the value of that "interaction" and having such a topic on a TT forum?
Oh, I do. I also pay attention to the fact that @zeio and @igorponger have been posting on forums almost as long as I have (possibly much longer) and have their supporters and critics on various issues and making it just about the politics (which again, has not been rebutted using any facts or reports) is simply asking me to say "it is propaganda" based on nothing I can defend if pressed on the issue. I also say that off topic posts are part of many forums. I also pointed out that with a broad laissez faire policy, more than just labelling something propaganda is needed to address it. And zeio definitely interacts.

This stuff used to cause lots of arguments between Tony and zeio. What I have at least done is isolate it to a thread people can ignore. I almost never come here unless I move stuff reported from another thread. And just about nothing has been reported from this thread. I just came here because I was interested in seeing the activity.

Maybe I will bring up a conversation about politics, zeio and igorponger again. Wish me luck!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: NetProphet
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
🏆 Top 1% Commenter
Well-Known Member
Sep 2022
2,055
2,066
8,398
While it seems fairly well accepted that a lot of the posts here are propaganda, I haven't seen a single rebuttal or counterpoint to the any of the propaganda based on something that everyone can say is objectively true. Not saying this is necessary, but just pointing out that if anyone has criticisms of the propaganda, it isn't grounded in anything that I can actually use to tell it is propaganda. And that is a huge part of the problem for me as a moderator.
Here, I'm not trying to make your life as a moderator difficult, I realise it an absolute minefield to moderate this type of rubbish and that's exactly why it shouldn't even be in here.
I have at least 12 arguments I could make (rhetorical, logical, functional, philosophical, factual, moral etc etc) but to do so would be to engage with this nonsense, which I won't do, because it shouldn't be here.
And engaging with someone who is so (how to put it)... stubbornly Stockholm syndromed would be a waste of time.

Now if the general argument is that "this is politics, it doesn't have a place on the forum".

1) a lot of politics affects table tennis and
2) lots of forums have sections for off-topic interests and conversations
Just because lots of forums do it doesn't mean it's a good idea.
If political debate is generally forbidden in the TT topic threads then why entertain it at all?
The reason is because nobody at the top is even aware of the type of idealogical anti western content is in here because, let's face it, they're not reading it.
I'm not even reading it but you don't have to read it to disagree with its existence in a TT forum.
So a lot of this comes down to moderator policy and in the absence of hard rules on the subject and someone taking the responsibility for the consequences of such rules,
This is the problem created by having it in the first place
we just have to manage as best we can. Now if someone reported the posts for being antagonistic, non-inclusive etc. moderators can look at that. Even as dangerous propaganda with a factually based rebuttal that is also shared on the thread.

Finally, the forum has a broad but not absolute laissez faire policy. It also has a lot of history that tells you broadly what is in bounds. However, no two posters (and even in my experience, no two moderators) are going to see an issue quite the same way. Some people ardently try to get banned members that other posters find humorous.

So I am sure that you might find the band aid solution I came up with stupid. It might be, but it is the best I could do. The negative response to the posts is encouraging, but on subjective issues, I am not the site owner, and given the past, I far less often substitute my judgment for general thrust the broad laissez faire policy, especially in the absence of formal reports of posts.
I know you are working with what you've got and doing what you have to and please believe me, I appreciate all of that.
Nothing I wrote was aimed at you, it was a pot shot at the existence of something that actually annoys me. Every forum the world over has sections like these that are taken over by a few manics pushing nonsense that's unrelated to the mother forum.
People abuse these sections. If they want political debate, or an echo chamber, then they should keep it on such forums designed specifically for that purpose.
And if they just want to spread propaganda they should keep it on their own websites 🤷
There is absolutely no benefit to anyone (except propagandists) to have any of it here.
Anyway, I appreciate the main protagonists TT content in the other sections so I'll leave it at that!
 
says Table Tennis - the sport for life.
says Table Tennis - the sport for life.
Member
Jan 2013
414
448
1,987
While I can see the value in having an off-topic section for people to discuss other interest or passions that they have, I personally think there should be a forum rule against discussing politics on a table tennis forum.

The reason is that discussions on politics is always divisive, especially since we have so many people from different cultures and backgrounds here. These discussion always become heated and get people worked up, and these high emotions usually spill over into other (table tennis) threads. I think we’ve already seen plenty of evidence of this here.

Table tennis discussions tend to do the exact opposite, in that it brings people together and unite us with a common passion, despite our different cultures and backgrounds.

This might all sound a little corny, but I believe it’s generally true. Having a simple forum rule against any political discussions will make the moderator’s job a lot easier too!
 
says Shoo...nothing to see here. - zeio
says Shoo...nothing to see here. - zeio
🏆 Top 1% Commenter
Well-Known Member
Jan 2018
12,996
12,895
29,087
Frank Wright: We need to save the nation.
Wang Yi: We need to save the United Nations.
ITTF: We need to save WTT. 🥹

We Need to SAVE the Nation | Restore Britain, Makerfield
https://youtu.be/lvNYFtbOl5g?t=45
Well, you can see that there's obviously there's [clears throat] the bankruptcy of the general liberal idea. There's the fact that you get a sense that the western idea and the ideas we've had since the Second World War are winding down themselves. At the same time, you can't escape the fact that we appear to be morally as well as financially bankrupt across the West, across Europe and in Britain. That the whole system is in a form of crisis, if you like. What we used to call normal life has been replaced by a permanent state of emergency in terms of our social incohesion, in terms of demographic change in terms of the fact that there appear to be no realistic solutions offered. And whoever you vote for, the same mad policies get continued throughout your life. And that's what I've seen the last 30 years. And if it goes on, we're finished.

Wang Yi speaks at United Nations
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/OOntsujFdIs
王毅在联合国安理会“维护联合国宪章宗旨和原则,加强以联合国为核心的国际体系”高级别会议上的讲话(全文)
https://cn.chinadiplomacy.org.cn/2026-05/27/content_118515977.shtml
当前,国际形势正经历二战结束以来最复杂深刻变化。战争阴云不断翻涌,丛林法则沉渣泛起。人类文明的航船正驶入危险水域,世界和平发展事业处于十字路口。

正如安理会厅这幅壁画所描绘的,世界在二战废墟上浴火重生,历史在逆流险阻中曲折前行。眼下的挑战,考验的是国际社会守护和平的信念,秉持公道的决心,革故鼎新的勇气。我们要团结起来,行动起来,维护联合国,激活联合国,壮大联合国。
(Currently, the international situation is undergoing the most complex and profound changes since the end of World War II. The shadow of war continues to loom, and the dregs of the law of the jungle are resurfacing. The ship of human civilization is sailing into dangerous waters, and the cause of world peace and development stands at a crossroads.

As depicted in this mural in the Security Council chamber, the world has risen from the ashes of World War II, and history has moved forward with twists and turns amidst adversity and obstacles. The challenges we face test the international community's belief in safeguarding peace, its determination to uphold justice, and its courage to reform and innovate. We must unite, act, uphold the United Nations, revitalize the United Nations, and strengthen the United Nations.)

Chinese FM calls for rejection of unilateralism bypassing UN Security Council
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/4EK3VRD1a1A

Wang Yi presents proposals at UN
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zl6QSXZ-lGA
王毅就完善全球治理提出九個改革方向 包括推動聯合國改革增效
https://news.tvb.com/tc/1173536-王毅就完善全球治理提出九個改革方向包括推動聯合國改革增效
外長王毅說:「聯合國雖不完美,但仍是全球治理最為權威的平台。我們要明確改革的目的,是加強而不是削弱聯合國,要堅持會員國主導,堅持改革公正、包容、透明。」

...

會議還凝聚五大共識,包括國家不論大小強弱,都有權自主選擇社會制度和發展道路,推進國際關係民主化,維護聯合國憲章宗旨和國際法統一適用,維護聯合國核心地位、踐行多邊主義,通過改革完善全球治理、縮小南北鴻溝,聚焦實際問題,以具體行動打造可視成果。
(Foreign Minister Wang Yi stated, "While the United Nations is not perfect, it remains the most authoritative platform for global governance. We must clarify that the purpose of reform is to strengthen, not weaken, the United Nations; we must uphold member state leadership; and we must insist on fair, inclusive, and transparent reform."
...

The meeting also reached five major consensuses, including that all countries, regardless of size or strength, have the right to independently choose their social system and development path; promoting the democratization of international relations; upholding the purposes of the UN Charter and the uniform application of international law; maintaining the UN's core position and practicing multilateralism; improving global governance through reform; narrowing the North-South divide; focusing on practical issues; and creating visible results through concrete actions.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: latej
says Leave the righteousness to me.
says Leave the righteousness to me.
🏆 Top 1% Commenter
Well-Known Member
Nov 2020
1,618
1,474
7,027
Thanks @zeio, the existence of people like him brings me a lot of joy and hope.

Now, imagine, some british guy here would post what you just posted, it would be taken by others here as more credible, it would be seen as critique from within, like I'm critizing my own side, not the other side (since we unf. still speak about sides-bs).

Or imagine, you'd bring up a valid criticism of something what is not quite right in China, as I'm sure there is also many such things... People here will be at your feet, LOL... OK, not, but worth trying...
 
  • Like
Reactions: NextLevel
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
🏆 Top 1% Commenter
Well-Known Member
Moderator
Oct 2014
20,100
26,703
71,276
Read 17 reviews
Here, I'm not trying to make your life as a moderator difficult, I realise it an absolute minefield to moderate this type of rubbish and that's exactly why it shouldn't even be in here.
I have at least 12 arguments I could make (rhetorical, logical, functional, philosophical, factual, moral etc etc) but to do so would be to engage with this nonsense, which I won't do, because it shouldn't be here.
And engaging with someone who is so (how to put it)... stubbornly Stockholm syndromed would be a waste of time.


Just because lots of forums do it doesn't mean it's a good idea.
If political debate is generally forbidden in the TT topic threads then why entertain it at all?
The reason is because nobody at the top is even aware of the type of idealogical anti western content is in here because, let's face it, they're not reading it.
I'm not even reading it but you don't have to read it to disagree with its existence in a TT forum.

This is the problem created by having it in the first place

I know you are working with what you've got and doing what you have to and please believe me, I appreciate all of that.
Nothing I wrote was aimed at you, it was a pot shot at the existence of something that actually annoys me. Every forum the world over has sections like these that are taken over by a few manics pushing nonsense that's unrelated to the mother forum.
People abuse these sections. If they want political debate, or an echo chamber, then they should keep it on such forums designed specifically for that purpose.
And if they just want to spread propaganda they should keep it on their own websites 🤷
There is absolutely no benefit to anyone (except propagandists) to have any of it here.
Anyway, I appreciate the main protagonists TT content in the other sections so I'll leave it at that!
Understood, I am mostly responding to the idea that this is all my design and is inherently dumb. If it was all my design, things would be different lol. The main thing I was trying to do by this action was achieved, the rest may have to wait until some rules get published if ever. Sometimes you take the first step of doing something thinking that you will be able to achieve the rest in a natural progression, then things change and you can't. Just the nature of life.
 
says Shoo...nothing to see here. - zeio
says Shoo...nothing to see here. - zeio
🏆 Top 1% Commenter
Well-Known Member
Jan 2018
12,996
12,895
29,087
6 PMs in 7 years or 7 PMs in 10 years depending on how one counts... :eek:

What has changed for the UK since David Cameron? How many trees have been felled to print those ballot papers? 你班友選咗乜𨳊出嚟呀?
UK in 2016 - Yes to Brexit
UK in 2026 - Brexit was a mistake
UK in 2036 - How many PMs will you guys have gone through, whether Brexit was right or wrong?

2013/11/13
Democracy is Failing | Eric X Li | Oxford Union
https://youtu.be/TUr7lUFqDgQ?t=569
in the developed world political paralysis and economic stagnation reign the hard fact is this democracy is failing from Washington to Cairo even the most naive Panda Huggers could not sustain the belief that China would follow such shining examples if the West wants to deal with China rationally a paradigm shift in its thinking is urgently needed and perhaps just perhaps such a shift could provide fresh ideas on how the West can approach the world a little differently and even begin to solve its own problems

https://x.com/thouse_opinions/status/1538099199358685184
T-House
@thouse_opinions
Years ago, Eric Li explained the biggest difference in the political systems between China and U.S.:

In America, you can change the political parties but you can't change policies.
In China, you can't change the party but you can change policies.
10:00 AM · Jun 18, 2022
 
  • Like
Reactions: ttarc and latej
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
Active Member
Nov 2019
843
759
3,062
Read 1 reviews
6 PMs in 7 years or 7 PMs in 10 years depending on how one counts... :eek:

What has changed for the UK since David Cameron? How many trees have been felled to print those ballot papers? 你班友選咗乜𨳊出嚟呀?
UK in 2016 - Yes to Brexit
UK in 2026 - Brexit was a mistake
UK in 2036 - How many PMs will you guys have gone through, whether Brexit was right or wrong?

2013/11/13
Democracy is Failing | Eric X Li | Oxford Union
https://youtu.be/TUr7lUFqDgQ?t=569


https://x.com/thouse_opinions/status/1538099199358685184
T-House
@thouse_opinions
Years ago, Eric Li explained the biggest difference in the political systems between China and U.S.:

In America, you can change the political parties but you can't change policies.
In China, you can't change the party but you can change policies.
10:00 AM · Jun 18, 2022

I would put it differently: any government, any society, any company that is run by incompetent leaders is doomed to fail. And thus, the ultimate question remains: how do we prevent incompetency from reaching the top?
 
says Shoo...nothing to see here. - zeio
says Shoo...nothing to see here. - zeio
🏆 Top 1% Commenter
Well-Known Member
Jan 2018
12,996
12,895
29,087
Watch this, if you think it is China's problem ;-) Or here, for longer version.
On top of that, I think the West has a bigger problem, which has been widely reported for several years now. You see it in table tennis players already, from the significant other of Boll to those of the Lebrun brothers. Besides that, people in China have been joking recently about 印拿大, 印大利亞, 印加坡...

In 2100, China will just be back to its population back in 1950, which was still 1.5 times higher than when the Qing dynasty was at its peak in mid-1800s, which accounted for ~30% world GDP. The US population will still be only ~60% that of China in 2100. Can folks in the West even keep their own identities before that happens?

Future immigration will change the face of America by 2065
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-r...tion-will-change-the-face-of-america-by-2065/
FT_15.10.05_USin2065_420px.png


The United States in 2050 Will Be Very Different Than It Is Today
https://www.pgpf.org/programs-and-projects/convening-experts/us-2050/research-summary/
US-2050-research-summary-without-immigration-population-will-barely-grow.jpg


[OC] Which states will still be majority white in 2050, when the US is projected to be majority-minority? [725x481]
https://www.reddit.com/r/MapPorn/comments/6mxtbe/oc_which_states_will_still_be_majority_white_in/

White people set to become MINORITY in US by 2050 with Britain close behind - bombshell new data
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVgo_Zy7Ovg

“White British Will Become A MINORITY” | Britain Has An “Integration EMERGENCY”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_i0NNFja8Hw

India is a top source and destination for world’s migrants
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-r...p-source-and-destination-for-worlds-migrants/

List of countries by past and projected future population
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_past_and_projected_future_population
 
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
🏆 Top 1% Commenter
Well-Known Member
Jan 2019
2,690
5,394
10,738
...
https://x.com/thouse_opinions/status/1538099199358685184
T-House
@thouse_opinions
Years ago, Eric Li explained the biggest difference in the political systems between China and U.S.:

In America, you can change the political parties but you can't change policies.
In China, you can't change the party but you can change policies.
10:00 AM · Jun 18, 2022
So the Chinese people chose the policy of year long Covid lockdowns with daily testing?

In the US, you change policies by changing the party in power. Yes, the policies are very different depending on who is in power. Hope the folks in China like leader for life Xi Jinping.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lando
says Shoo...nothing to see here. - zeio
says Shoo...nothing to see here. - zeio
🏆 Top 1% Commenter
Well-Known Member
Jan 2018
12,996
12,895
29,087
Cunning Soviet Union China for "ideologically subverting" the young American population without firing a single shot...

China Is Winning The Global Energy War By A Mile And Nobody Is Even Paying Attention
https://youtu.be/207TJmydX8E?t=880
It is honestly concerning for me to see the difference between these two countries, knowing that I exist in one of them and knowing that the other one makes every move with intent and purpose and strategy. We fight culture wars and identity wars and we argue over ridiculous things that don't matter. And I get to see 20 stories a day about a reflecting pool that I do not care about while China is in it to win it.

Reflecting pool problems after nearly $15M renovation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnWhqufV4uk
Reflecting pool controversy grows amid algae and cost concerns
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6f3UU183e4

You're not "becoming Chinese," you just yearn for socialism
https://youtu.be/vDGc-ReL4Dk?t=845
So instead of private individuals owning everything and deciding how society runs and using that power to engage in heinous and depraved acts of violence and imperialist wars and all sorts of terrible, disgusting stuff, socialism puts the workers in charge. And that's called a dictatorship of the proletariat, aka a real democracy, as opposed to a dictatorship of the bourgeoisi, which we live under now. But either way, a government's going to be a dictatorship because that's what a government is. Someone's going to have to dictate. And I'd rather it be the masses and not a bunch of rich guys who are terrible.

FULL INTERVIEW with Yuri Bezmenov: The Four Stages of Ideological Subversion (1984)
https://youtu.be/yErKTVdETpw?t=4131
what it basically means is to change the perception of reality of every american to such an extent that despite of the abundance of information no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interests of defending themselves their families their community and their country it's a great brainwashing process which goes very slow and is divided in four basic stages uh the first one being demoralization it takes from 15 to 20 years to demoralize a nation why that many years because this is the minimum number of years which requires to educate one generation of students in the country of of of your enemy exposed to the ideology of the enemy in other words marxism leninism ideology is being pumped into the soft heads of of at least three generations of american students without being challenged or counterbalanced by the basic values of americanism american patriotism the result the result you can see most of the people who graduated in 60s dropouts or half-baked intellectuals are now occupying the positions of power in the government civil service business mass media educational system you are stuck with them you cannot get rid of them they are contaminated they are programmed to think and react to certain stimuli in a certain pattern you cannot change their mind even if you if you expose them to authentic information even if you prove that white is white and black is black you still cannot change the basic perception and the logic of behavior in other words these people the process of demoralization is complete and irreversible to get rid society of these people you have you need another 20 or or 15 years to educate a new generation of patriotically minded and and common common sense people who would be acting in favor and in the interests of of the of united states society and yet these people have been programmed and as you say in place and who are favorable to an opening with the soviet concept these are the very people who would be marked for extermination in this country most of them yes simply because the psychological shock when they will see in future what the what the beautiful society of equality and social justice means in practice obviously they will revolt they they will they will be very unhappy frustrated people

RECENTLY DIAGNOSED CHINESE?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-BUXnXBalcw
There's a reason China will win that is underappreciated and it's that the younger generations of Americans love China. China has psychologically imprinted on us in a way that's irreversible... When no one was there for you. China was there for you. China was there for me. I love China. Why wouldn't I love China? I have nothing but positive associations with China, deeply ingrained in my psyche.

China Is the Global It-Girl Now
https://youtu.be/hAM3QABIGFQ?t=203
Yeah. And China will lose the US market, which as I've said is 15%.
We don't care. We don't we don't care. China has been here for 5,000 years. Most of the time, there was no United States and we survived. And if the United States wants to bully China, we will deal with the situation without the United States. and we expect to survive for another 5,000 years.
He's dunking on us. Um, I don't even know what to say. He's in charge now. He China leads the world after this video. The only thing that we understand in America is when someone big dicks us. We only understand power when it's coming from someone who's a little bit aggressive and egotistical. You can have every possible credential and for some reason in America that's not enough. You also have to walk with the confidence and talk with the ego that you're that guy. I understand it's a cultural thing.

We Can't Beat China
https://youtu.be/LFNhDtm8fko?t=144
If China is the Enemy, Why Are We Copying Them?
https://youtu.be/KcKeuwQBPKI?t=738
 
Last edited:
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
🏆 Top 1% Commenter
Well-Known Member
May 2011
2,446
2,925
6,973
I say go for it as long as it is clearly marked and doesn't spill over into other threads
I agree. I mean, I get the people who want no politics on a TT message board, but there's a reason all sorts of message boards have a politics sub-threads or sub-forums. Politics affects every aspect of life, so no matter the topic of focus there's always gonna be someone discussing the political aspect of it. Trying to squash it is simply not realistic. It takes too much time, and even if a board has the manpower to constantly moderate for political content the moderators' own political biases usually shine through, resulting in uneven or at least perceived uneven enforcement and thus more acrimony. IMO, the best way to keep politics from derailing the topic of focus is by quarantining it into designated spots.
 
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
Member
Oct 2025
29
45
418
I agree.
someone discussing the political aspect of it.
I don’t see any discussion of politics here.
This thread is just pure spamming of one sided propaganda.

Forum rules:
These forums define spam as unsolicited advertisement for goods, services, and/or other websites or posts with little, no, or completely unrelated content.
 
says Shoo...nothing to see here. - zeio
says Shoo...nothing to see here. - zeio
🏆 Top 1% Commenter
Well-Known Member
Jan 2018
12,996
12,895
29,087
I would put it differently: any government, any society, any company that is run by incompetent leaders is doomed to fail. And thus, the ultimate question remains: how do we prevent incompetency from reaching the top?
Well, there is no one-size-fits-all solution. As China has always stressed, every country must find its own path that is compatible with its people, conditions, culture and history, the last of which has unfortunately been less than desirable in recent EU leaders...

For the West, coming to terms with the fact that there is a problem with their current form of governance/democracy would be a good starting point.

Following a Chinese Path of Human Rights Development and Contributing China’s Strength to Global Human Rights Governance
https://www.mfa.gov.cn/eng/wjbzhd/202405/t20240527_11312272.html
— Committing to a path of human rights development that suits the realities of each country. “Human rights for all” is the shared pursuit of humanity. Meanwhile, countries vary from one another in historical background, cultural heritage, national conditions and needs of the people. There is no one-size-fits-all model in the protection of human rights. The right of all countries to independently choose one’s own path of human rights development should be respected. Blindly copying the model of others would be ill-fitted for one’s own conditions, and imposing one’s model upon others would entail endless troubles.

China's Political Meritocracy - What The West Gets Wrong About China | Professor Daniel Bell
https://youtu.be/irBs3hp-Ygk?t=333
let's say there's four things that they're looking for in very general terms. um one is above average let's just say intelligence or analytical ability because especially at high level of government the issues are very complex right how to manage an economy how to think about the impact of AI how to think about foreign relations um and so on um so so that's why those tests to get into government they're more like frankly like high level IQ tests you know so to get into anywhere near the top you can expect them to have superior analytical ability you have to have above average emotional intelligence because to be a leader in China it's not like you just have to be smart most of your day and I know this because I I served as dean you spend your time in meetings deliberating about issues with fellow leaders and you have to persuade people of different perspectives and people of different backgrounds you have to have very high level emotional intelligence to do that that's one thing that's important and then you have to have this incredible capacity for hard work because literally they're working all the time there's like even no weekend breaks you know um that's one thing that when I served as public official literally I couldn't do that because I was so tired all the time then my fellow leaders I had great respect for them because they were like working all the time it's even more so at high level of government but then the thing you mentioned is probably the most essential which is that you have to have you have to be willing to certain extent to serve the public as opposed to being corrupt meaning misusing resources for you or your own family interests or private interest and and that's helps to explain why throughout Chinese history there's been these anti-corruption campaigns because if there's lots of corruption in the system it really undermines the whole political meritocracy because even if you have somebody in fact it's more dangerous you have somebody who's smart who has high emotional intelligence who works hard and if they're a bad person if they're corrupt that's even more dangerous so you have to address that virtue part that's really a really key pillar for the whole political system

Mohamed Alabbar on success and why the UAE is outpacing the UK and US
https://youtu.be/A-ydbL4AwLY?t=529
So destroy your country but get more votes to stay in power. And that is the problem I have with democracy these days. Somebody got to fix democracy.
https://youtu.be/A-ydbL4AwLY?t=698
you don't have any money to give to the police in London and you want to go to war
that's all of Europe
and you're in such you're in such debt and you want to go to war like are you there like are you awake
so not in touch with reality
https://youtu.be/A-ydbL4AwLY?t=854
So they said, "No, we need 12 years study to study the snails that are living in this area." I said, "12 years? I'll be 85 by that time." I said, "Well, you know what? Take care of the snails and let the let the German sleep on the streets."
 
Last edited:
says Shoo...nothing to see here. - zeio
says Shoo...nothing to see here. - zeio
🏆 Top 1% Commenter
Well-Known Member
Jan 2018
12,996
12,895
29,087
I don’t see any discussion of politics here.
This thread is just pure spamming of one sided propaganda.

Forum rules:
These forums define spam as unsolicited advertisement for goods, services, and/or other websites or posts with little, no, or completely unrelated content.
Exactly, cunning Singaporean MSM for smearing Japan and even the US in the latest documentary series. Shame on them.

"Once Infected, Death Was Certain": Inside Japan's Secret Death Lab | Inside Unit 731 - Part 1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AXM1DozZwjk

Why The US Covered Up Japan's Deadly WW2 Human Lab Experiments | Inside Unit 731 - Part 2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LqB5fAHjyME

The Indonesian Doctor Framed For Japan's WW2 Vaccine Massacre | Inside Unit 731 - Extra
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c97IQ4HNs58

WW2 Germ Lab Cover-Up In Occupied Singapore: Oka 9420 | Inside Unit 731 - Extra
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hAl086cEs0
 
Top