This user has no status.
This user has no status.
Member
I'll have to disagree about this.Nah, his FH is just bad. He obviously spent a lot of time trying to make his RPB good but this was at the expense of his FH training, and his RPB is still quite a bit worse than the shakehand BH especially in terms of stability.
This is why I think that RPB is quite useless at the amateur level and one would play better with LP on the other side and learning to use LP to disrupt the opponent to then finish them off with FH loopkill. LP also makes them almost immune in serve receive while retaining most of the inverted benefits (really deceptive serves + penhold 3rd ball)
When I was using double inverted I was never afraid of the RPB penholders because of their weak FH, plus I was always better in the BH-BH diagonal anyways. The worst thing is that they were always bad at defending heavy topspin with RPB inverted which is a huge problem.
When you are up against people much better than yourselves, it really doesn't matter if you play LP or not. GJV is exactly that here. The guy is able to mix his serve really well and with good speed and placement too. I imagine he'd still mess around with the LP player, perhaps will make him look even worse than the penhold guy.
His fh looks bad because he's just up against GJV. As you can see, his FH was solid enough he could play for a while with GJV.